Knowledge Assessment: Squeezing Information From Multiple-Choice Testing

被引:2
|
作者
Nickerson, Raymond S. [1 ]
Butler, Susan F. [1 ]
Carlin, Michael T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Dept Psychol, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[2] Rider Univ, Dept Psychol, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648 USA
关键词
knowledge assessment; multiple-choice testing; confidence assessment; STRATEGIC REGULATION; DONT KNOW; PERSONAL PROBABILITIES; IMMEDIATE FEEDBACK; NUMBER-RIGHT; TEST-SCORES; VALIDITY; MEMORY; DISTRACTORS; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1037/xap0000041
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Knowledge assessment via testing can be viewed from two vantage points: that of the test administrator and that of the test taker. From the administrator's perspective, the objective is to discover what an individual knows about a domain of interest. From that of the test taker, the challenge is to reveal what one knows. In this article we describe a procedure for administering and scoring multiple-choice tests that satisfies both of these objectives and we present experimental data that demonstrate its effectiveness. The method allows test takers to provide specific information about their confidence that each alternative for an item is the correct answer and makes guessing not only unnecessary but detrimental. From this information the administrator can derive measures of both knowledge and confidence, which, we argue, provides better estimates than systems that do not allow measurement of partial knowledge. The use of such measures for purposes of evaluation both of individual test takers' knowledge of a subject of interest and of the effectiveness of instruction with respect to that subject is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 177
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multiple-choice Testing: Knowledge, or Random Choice?
    Simonova, Ivana
    2014 IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE (EDUCON), 2014, : 819 - 823
  • [2] MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTING
    AKEROYD, FM
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 1984, 61 (05) : 475 - 475
  • [3] HUMAN SELF-ASSESSMENT IN MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTING
    HASSMEN, P
    HUNT, DP
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1994, 31 (02) : 149 - 160
  • [4] The Testing Methods and Gender Differences in Multiple-Choice Assessment
    Ng, Annie W. Y.
    Chan, Alan H. S.
    IAENG TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 3, 2009, 1174 : 236 - +
  • [5] REEXAMINATION OF MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTING
    WOMER, FB
    EDUCATION, 1970, 90 (04): : 285 - 289
  • [6] THE USE OF MULTIPLE-CHOICE FOR TESTING
    TRIEBER, JM
    TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 1980, 34 (10): : 24 - 28
  • [7] MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTING IN ANATOMY
    NNODIM, JO
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1992, 26 (04) : 301 - 309
  • [8] Testing anatomy: Dissecting spatial and non-spatial knowledge in multiple-choice question assessment
    Dickson, Julie
    Shaw, Darren J.
    Gardiner, Andrew
    Rhind, Susan
    ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2024, 17 (01) : 102 - 113
  • [9] Modeling Partial Knowledge in Multiple-Choice Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment
    Fukushima, Kentaro
    Uchida, Nao
    Okada, Kensuke
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2025, 50 (01) : 5 - 43
  • [10] Valuing Assessment in Teacher Education - Multiple-choice Competency Testing
    Martin, Dona L.
    Itter, Diane
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2014, 39 (07): : 1 - 14