Fish community assessment with eDNA metabarcoding: effects of sampling design and bioinformatic filtering

被引:121
|
作者
Evans, Nathan T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Yiyuan [1 ,2 ]
Renshaw, Mark A. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Olds, Brett P. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Deiner, Kristy [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Turner, Cameron R. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Jerde, Christopher L. [1 ,2 ,8 ]
Lodge, David M. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Lamberti, Gary A. [1 ,2 ]
Pfrender, Michael E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Biol Sci, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Environm Change Initiat, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[3] Florida Int Univ, Southeast Environm Res Ctr, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[4] Hawaii Pacific Univ, Ocean Inst, Shrimp Dept, Waimanalo, HI USA
[5] Cornell Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Ithaca, NY USA
[6] Atkinson Ctr Sustainable Future, Ithaca, NY USA
[7] EcoSyst Genet LLC, South Bend, IN USA
[8] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Marine Sci Inst, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
关键词
ENVIRONMENTAL DNA; BIODIVERSITY; RICHNESS; CONSERVATION; SIMILARITY; DIVERSITY; SEARCH; TOOL;
D O I
10.1139/cjfas-2016-0306
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Species richness is a metric of biodiversity that represents the number of species present in a community. Traditional fisheries assessments that rely on capture of organisms often underestimate true species richness. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is an alternative tool that infers species richness by collecting and sequencing DNA present in the ecosystem. Our objective was to determine how spatial distribution of samples and "bioinformatic stringency" affected eDNA-metabarcoding estimates of species richness compared with capture-based estimates in a 2.2 ha reservoir. When bioinformatic criteria required species to be detected only in a single sample, eDNA metabarcoding detected all species captured with traditional methods plus an additional 11 noncaptured species. However, when we required species to be detected with multiple markers and in multiple samples, eDNA metabarcoding detected only seven of the captured species. Our analysis of the spatial patterns of species detection indicated that eDNA was distributed relatively homogeneously throughout the reservoir, except near the inflowing stream. We suggest that interpretation of eDNA metabarcoding data must consider the potential effects of water body type, spatial resolution, and bioinformatic stringency.
引用
收藏
页码:1362 / 1374
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Correction to "eDNA metabarcoding reveals riverine fish community structure and climate associations in northeastern Canada"
    Crowley
    ENVIRONMENTAL DNA, 2024, 6 (02):
  • [22] Aquatic insect community structure revealed by eDNA metabarcoding derives indices for environmental assessment
    Uchida, Noriko
    Kubota, Kengo
    Aita, Shunsuke
    Kazama, So
    PEERJ, 2020, 8
  • [23] Primer set evaluation and sampling method assessment for the monitoring of fish communities in the North-western part of the Mediterranean Sea through eDNA metabarcoding
    Roblet, Sylvain
    Priouzeau, Fabrice
    Gambini, Gilles
    Derijard, Benoit
    Sabourault, Cecile
    ENVIRONMENTAL DNA, 2024, 6 (03):
  • [24] Steps forward in biomonitoring 2.0: eDNA Metabarcoding and community-level modelling allow the assessment of complex drivers of Neotropical fish diversity
    Carvalho, Daniel C.
    Leal, Cecilia G.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2023, 29 (07) : 1688 - 1690
  • [25] Determining an effective sampling method for eDNA metabarcoding: a case study for fish biodiversity monitoring in a small, natural river
    Masayuki K. Sakata
    Takeshi Watanabe
    Nobutaka Maki
    Kousuke Ikeda
    Toshihiro Kosuge
    Hiroaki Okada
    Hiroki Yamanaka
    Tetsuya Sado
    Masaki Miya
    Toshifumi Minamoto
    Limnology, 2021, 22 : 221 - 235
  • [26] Determining an effective sampling method for eDNA metabarcoding: a case study for fish biodiversity monitoring in a small, natural river
    Sakata, Masayuki K.
    Watanabe, Takeshi
    Maki, Nobutaka
    Ikeda, Kousuke
    Kosuge, Toshihiro
    Okada, Hiroaki
    Yamanaka, Hiroki
    Sado, Tetsuya
    Miya, Masaki
    Minamoto, Toshifumi
    LIMNOLOGY, 2021, 22 (02) : 221 - 235
  • [27] Merging two eDNA metabarcoding approaches and citizen-science-based sampling to facilitate fish community monitoring along vast Sub-Saharan coastlines
    Burian, Alfred
    Bruce, Kat
    Tovela, Erica
    Bakker, Judith
    Balcells, Laura
    Bennett, Rhett
    Chordekar, Sarah
    Costa, Hugo M.
    Crampton-Platt, Alex
    de Boer, Hugo
    Ross-Gillespie, Vere
    de Sacramento, Antonio
    Sidat, Naseeba
    Simbine, Luisa
    Ready, Jonathan
    Tang, Cuong
    Mauvisseau, Quentin
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2023, 23 (07) : 1641 - 1655
  • [28] eDNA metabarcoding reveals differences in fish diversity and community structure in heterogeneous habitat areas shaped by cascade hydropower
    Cheng, Ruli
    Luo, Yang
    Zhang, Yufeng
    Li, Qinghua
    Li, Yingwen
    Shen, Yanjun
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 13 (07):
  • [29] The Effect of Spatio-Temporal Sampling and Biological Replication on the Detection of Kelp Forest Fish Communities Using eDNA Metabarcoding
    Courtaillac, Kira-Lee
    Landschoff, Jannes
    Hull, Kelvin
    von der Heyden, Sophie
    ENVIRONMENTAL DNA, 2024, 6 (05):
  • [30] Freshwater fish community assessment using eDNA metabarcoding vs. capture-based methods: Differences in efficiency and resolution coupled to habitat and ecology
    Curto, Manuel
    Batista, Sofia
    Santos, Carlos D.
    Ribeiro, Filipe
    Nogueira, Sofia
    Ribeiro, Diogo
    Prindle, Benjamin
    Licari, Daniel
    Riccioni, Giulia
    Dias, Diogo
    Pina-Martins, Francisco
    Jentoft, Sissel
    Verissimo, Ana
    Alves, Maria Judite
    Gante, Hugo F.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2025, 274