Fish community assessment with eDNA metabarcoding: effects of sampling design and bioinformatic filtering

被引:121
|
作者
Evans, Nathan T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Yiyuan [1 ,2 ]
Renshaw, Mark A. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Olds, Brett P. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Deiner, Kristy [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Turner, Cameron R. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Jerde, Christopher L. [1 ,2 ,8 ]
Lodge, David M. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Lamberti, Gary A. [1 ,2 ]
Pfrender, Michael E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Biol Sci, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Environm Change Initiat, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[3] Florida Int Univ, Southeast Environm Res Ctr, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[4] Hawaii Pacific Univ, Ocean Inst, Shrimp Dept, Waimanalo, HI USA
[5] Cornell Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Ithaca, NY USA
[6] Atkinson Ctr Sustainable Future, Ithaca, NY USA
[7] EcoSyst Genet LLC, South Bend, IN USA
[8] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Marine Sci Inst, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
关键词
ENVIRONMENTAL DNA; BIODIVERSITY; RICHNESS; CONSERVATION; SIMILARITY; DIVERSITY; SEARCH; TOOL;
D O I
10.1139/cjfas-2016-0306
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Species richness is a metric of biodiversity that represents the number of species present in a community. Traditional fisheries assessments that rely on capture of organisms often underestimate true species richness. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is an alternative tool that infers species richness by collecting and sequencing DNA present in the ecosystem. Our objective was to determine how spatial distribution of samples and "bioinformatic stringency" affected eDNA-metabarcoding estimates of species richness compared with capture-based estimates in a 2.2 ha reservoir. When bioinformatic criteria required species to be detected only in a single sample, eDNA metabarcoding detected all species captured with traditional methods plus an additional 11 noncaptured species. However, when we required species to be detected with multiple markers and in multiple samples, eDNA metabarcoding detected only seven of the captured species. Our analysis of the spatial patterns of species detection indicated that eDNA was distributed relatively homogeneously throughout the reservoir, except near the inflowing stream. We suggest that interpretation of eDNA metabarcoding data must consider the potential effects of water body type, spatial resolution, and bioinformatic stringency.
引用
收藏
页码:1362 / 1374
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Environmental biomonitoring of reef fish community structure with eDNA metabarcoding in the Coral Triangle
    Ester Restiana Endang Gelis
    M. Mukhlis Kamal
    Beginer Subhan
    Imam Bachtiar
    Lalu M. Iqbal Sani
    Hawis Madduppa
    Environmental Biology of Fishes, 2021, 104 : 887 - 903
  • [12] eDNA metabarcoding reveals differences in fish diversity and community structure in Danjiang River
    Deng, Jie
    Zhang, Xiaochun
    Yao, Xueying
    Rao, Junhua
    Dai, Fei
    Wang, Han
    Wang, Yicong
    Jiang, Wei
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [13] New insights into biologic interpretation of bioinformatic pipelines for fish eDNA metabarcoding: A case study in Pearl River estuary
    Li, Zhuoying
    Zhao, Wencheng
    Jiang, Yun
    Wen, Yongjing
    Li, Min
    Liu, Li
    Zou, Keshu
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 368
  • [14] Application of eDNA metabarcoding in the assessment of fish biodiversity in Philippine mangroves: Challenges and opportunities
    Naputo, Camila Frances P.
    Isowa, Yukinobu
    Gerona-Daga, Maria Elisa
    Artigas, Ma. Daniela
    Kajita, Tadashi
    Salmo III, Severino G.
    REGIONAL STUDIES IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2024, 77
  • [15] Fish community shifts along a strong fluvial environmental gradient revealed by eDNA metabarcoding
    Garcia-Machado, Erik
    Laporte, Martin
    Normandeau, Eric
    Hernandez, Cecilia
    Cote, Guillaume
    Paradis, Yves
    Mingelbier, Marc
    Bernatchez, Louis
    ENVIRONMENTAL DNA, 2022, 4 (01): : 117 - 134
  • [16] eDNA metabarcoding reveals riverine fish community structure and climate associations in northeastern Canada
    Crowley, Samantha E.
    Bentzen, Paul
    Kess, Tony
    Duffy, Steven J.
    Messmer, Amber M.
    Watson, Beth
    Dempson, J. Brian
    Keefe, Donald G.
    Perry, Robert C.
    Marquis, Benjamin
    Hajibabaei, Mehrdad
    Fahner, Nicole
    Berghuis, Lesley
    Hobrecker, Kerry
    Bradbury, Ian R.
    ENVIRONMENTAL DNA, 2024, 6 (01):
  • [17] Using eDNA Metabarcoding to Monitor Changes in Fish Community Composition After Barrier Removal
    Muha, Teja P.
    Rodriguez-Barreto, Deiene
    O'Rorke, Richard
    Garcia de Leaniz, Carlos
    Consuegra, Sofia
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 9
  • [18] Reduced sampling intensity through key sampling site selection for optimal characterization of riverine fish communities by eDNA metabarcoding
    Van Driessche, Charlotte
    Everts, Teun
    Neyrinck, Sabrina
    Deflem, Io
    Bonte, Dries
    Brys, Rein
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 169
  • [19] Combined Use of eDNA Metabarcoding and Bottom Trawling for the Assessment of Fish Biodiversity in the Zhoushan Sea
    Zhou, Shan
    Fan, Chenrong
    Xia, Haoming
    Zhang, Jian
    Yang, Wei
    Ji, Dengjie
    Wang, Lei
    Chen, Li
    Liu, Nannan
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2022, 8
  • [20] Harnessing eDNA metabarcoding to investigate fish community composition and its seasonal changes in the Oslo fjord
    Carvalho, Cintia Oliveira
    Gromstad, William
    Dunthorn, Micah
    Karlsen, Hans Erik
    Schroder-Nielsen, Audun
    Ready, Jonathan Stuart
    Haugaasen, Torbjrn
    Sornes, Grete
    de Boer, Hugo
    Mauvisseau, Quentin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):