Comparison of Two Predictive Models of Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients Based on the Combined Use of Inflammatory Markers

被引:5
|
作者
Li, Xiaoming [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Chao [2 ]
Wang, Xiaoli [1 ]
Mao, Zhi [2 ]
Yi, Hongyu [1 ]
Zhou, Feihu [2 ]
机构
[1] Med Sch Chinese PLA, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Med Ctr 1, Dept Crit Care Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
nomogram; score; model; prediction; inflammatory marker; sepsis; IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY; PROCALCITONIN; INTERLEUKIN-6; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.2147/IJGM.S348797
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory response due to infection, resulting in organ dysfunction. Timely targeted interventions can improve prognosis. Inflammation plays a crucial role in the process of sepsis. To identify potential sepsis early, we developed and validated a nomogram model and a simple risk scoring model for predicting sepsis in critically ill patients. Methods: The medical records of adult patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) from August 2017 to December 2020 were analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (70%) and a validation cohort (30%). A nomogram model was developed through multivariate logistic regression analysis. The continuous variables included in nomogram model were transformed into dichotomous variables. Then, a multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed based on these dichotomous variables, and the odds ratio (OR) for each variable was used to construct a simple risk scoring model. The receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were constructed, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Results: A total of 2074 patients were enrolled. Finally, white blood cell (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were included in our models. The AUC of the nomogram model and the simple risk scoring model were 0.854 and 0.842, respectively. The prediction performance of the two models on sepsis is comparable (p = 0.1298). Conclusion: This study combining five commonly available inflammatory markers (WBC, CRP, IL-6, PCT and NLR) developed a nomogram model and a simple risk scoring model to predict sepsis in critically ill patients. Although the prediction performance of the two models is comparable, the simple risk scoring model may be simpler and more practical for clinicians to identify potential sepsis in critically ill patients at an early stage and strategize treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:1013 / 1022
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of Anti-Inflammatory and Antimicrobial Cosupplementations on Sepsis Prevention in Critically Ill Trauma Patients at High Risk for Sepsis
    Kamel, Noha A.
    Soliman, Moetaza M.
    Abo-Zeid, Maha A.
    Shaaban, Mona I.
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [42] Sepsis prediction in critically ill patients by platelet activation markers on ICU admission: a prospective pilot study
    Layios N.
    Delierneux C.
    Hego A.
    Huart J.
    Gosset C.
    Lecut C.
    Maes N.
    Geurts P.
    Joly A.
    Lancellotti P.
    Albert A.
    Damas P.
    Gothot A.
    Oury C.
    Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, 5 (1)
  • [43] KINETIC THERAPY IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS - COMBINED RESULTS BASED ON METAANALYSIS
    CHOI, SC
    NELSON, LD
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 1992, 7 (01) : 57 - 62
  • [44] Predictive Validity of Sepsis-3 Definitions and Sepsis Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: A Cohort Study in 49 ICUs in Argentina
    Estenssoro, Elisa
    Kanoore Edul, Vanina S.
    Loudet, Cecilia I.
    Osatnik, Javier
    Rios, Fernando G.
    Vazquez, Daniela N.
    Pozo, Mario O.
    Lattanzio, Bernardo
    Palizas, Fernando
    Klein, Francisco
    Piezny, Damian
    Rubatto Birri, Paolo N.
    Tuhay, Graciela
    Diaz, Anatilde
    Santamaria, Analia
    Zakalik, Graciela
    Dubin, Arnaldo
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (08) : 1276 - 1283
  • [45] Comparison of two models of a treatment area with respect to treatment times in critically ill patients. A pilot study
    Kippnich, M.
    Wallstroem, F.
    Kolbe, M.
    Erhard, H.
    Kippnich, U.
    Wurmb, T.
    ANAESTHESIST, 2018, 67 (08): : 592 - 598
  • [46] A comparison of predictive equations of energy expenditure and measured energy expenditure in critically ill patients
    Kross, Erin K.
    Sena, Matthew
    Schmidt, Karyn
    Stapleton, Renee D.
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 27 (03)
  • [47] Effect of glutamine supplementation on inflammatory markers in critically ill patients supported with enteral or parenteral feeding
    Gholamalizadeh, Maryam
    Tabrizi, Reza
    Rezaei, Shahla
    Badeli, Mostafa
    Shadnoush, Mahdi
    Jarrahi, Alireza Mosavi
    Doaei, Saeid
    JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2022, 46 (01) : 61 - 68
  • [48] Population pharmacokinetics and evaluation of the predictive performance of pharmacokinetic models in critically ill patients receiving continuous infusion meropenem: a comparison of eight pharmacokinetic models
    Dhaese, Sofie A. M.
    Farkas, Andras
    Colin, Pieter
    Lipman, Jeffrey
    Stove, Veronique
    Verstraete, Alain G.
    Roberts, Jason A.
    De Waele, Jan J.
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2019, 74 (02) : 432 - 441
  • [49] Comparison of three different commercial PCR assays for the detection of pathogens in critically ill patients with sepsis
    Schreiber, J.
    Nierhaus, A.
    Braune, S. A.
    de Heer, G.
    Kluge, S.
    MEDIZINISCHE KLINIK-INTENSIVMEDIZIN UND NOTFALLMEDIZIN, 2013, 108 (04) : 360 - 360
  • [50] Energy requirements and the use of predictive equations versus indirect calorimetry in critically ill patients
    Wichansawakun, Sanit
    Meddings, Liisa
    Alberda, Cathy
    Robbins, Sarah
    Gramlich, Leah
    APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2015, 40 (02) : 207 - 210