Comparison of Two Predictive Models of Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients Based on the Combined Use of Inflammatory Markers

被引:5
|
作者
Li, Xiaoming [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Chao [2 ]
Wang, Xiaoli [1 ]
Mao, Zhi [2 ]
Yi, Hongyu [1 ]
Zhou, Feihu [2 ]
机构
[1] Med Sch Chinese PLA, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Med Ctr 1, Dept Crit Care Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
nomogram; score; model; prediction; inflammatory marker; sepsis; IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY; PROCALCITONIN; INTERLEUKIN-6; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.2147/IJGM.S348797
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory response due to infection, resulting in organ dysfunction. Timely targeted interventions can improve prognosis. Inflammation plays a crucial role in the process of sepsis. To identify potential sepsis early, we developed and validated a nomogram model and a simple risk scoring model for predicting sepsis in critically ill patients. Methods: The medical records of adult patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) from August 2017 to December 2020 were analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (70%) and a validation cohort (30%). A nomogram model was developed through multivariate logistic regression analysis. The continuous variables included in nomogram model were transformed into dichotomous variables. Then, a multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed based on these dichotomous variables, and the odds ratio (OR) for each variable was used to construct a simple risk scoring model. The receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were constructed, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Results: A total of 2074 patients were enrolled. Finally, white blood cell (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were included in our models. The AUC of the nomogram model and the simple risk scoring model were 0.854 and 0.842, respectively. The prediction performance of the two models on sepsis is comparable (p = 0.1298). Conclusion: This study combining five commonly available inflammatory markers (WBC, CRP, IL-6, PCT and NLR) developed a nomogram model and a simple risk scoring model to predict sepsis in critically ill patients. Although the prediction performance of the two models is comparable, the simple risk scoring model may be simpler and more practical for clinicians to identify potential sepsis in critically ill patients at an early stage and strategize treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:1013 / 1022
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Fcγ receptor expression on neutrophils with procalcitonin for the diagnosis of sepsis in critically ill patients
    Hsu, Kuo-Hsuan
    Chan, Ming-Chen
    Wang, Jiunn-Min
    Lin, Liang-Yi
    Wu, Chieh-Liang
    RESPIROLOGY, 2011, 16 (01) : 152 - 160
  • [32] Comparison between presepsin, procalcitonin, and CRP as biomarkers to diagnose sepsis in critically ill patients
    Juneja, Deven
    Jain, Navin
    Singh, Omender
    Goel, Amit
    Arora, Shweta
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 39 (03) : 458 - 462
  • [33] Platelet mitochondrial dysfunction in critically ill patients: comparison between sepsis and cardiogenic shock
    Protti, Alessandro
    Fortunato, Francesco
    Artoni, Andrea
    Lecchi, Anna
    Motta, Giovanna
    Mistraletti, Giovanni
    Novembrino, Cristina
    Comi, Giacomo Pietro
    Gattinoni, Luciano
    CRITICAL CARE, 2015, 19
  • [34] Effects of midazolam and dexmedetomidine on inflammatory responses and gastric intramucosal pH to sepsis, in critically ill patients
    Memis, D.
    Hekimoglu, S.
    Vatan, I.
    Yandim, T.
    Yuksel, M.
    Sut, N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2007, 98 (04) : 550 - 552
  • [35] Diagnostic accuracy and clinical relevance of an inflammatory biomarker panel for sepsis in adult critically ill patients
    Bauer, Philippe R.
    Kashyap, Rahul
    League, Stacy C.
    Park, John G.
    Block, Darci R.
    Baumann, Nikola A.
    Algeciras-Schimnich, Alicia
    Jenkins, Sarah M.
    Smith, Carin Y.
    Gajic, Ognjen
    Abraham, Roshini S.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2016, 84 (02) : 175 - 180
  • [36] Use of models in identification and prediction of physiology in critically ill surgical patients
    Cohen, M. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 (04) : 487 - 493
  • [37] Development of a model-based clinical sepsis biomarker for critically ill patients
    Lin, Jessica
    Parente, Jacquelyn D.
    Chase, J. Geoffrey
    Shaw, Geoffrey M.
    Blakemore, Amy J.
    LeCompte, Aaron J.
    Pretty, Christopher
    Razak, Normy N.
    Lee, Dominic S.
    Hann, Christopher E.
    Wang, Sheng-Hui
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2011, 102 (02) : 149 - 155
  • [38] The Use of Common Continuous Monitoring Parameters A Quality Indicator for Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis
    Giuliano, Karen K.
    Kleinpell, Ruth
    AACN ADVANCED CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 16 (02) : 140 - 148
  • [39] Comparison of two methods for cardiac output measurement in critically ill patients
    Saraceni, E.
    Rossi, S.
    Persona, P.
    Dan, M.
    Rizzi, S.
    Meroni, M.
    Ori, C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 106 (05) : 690 - 694
  • [40] Comparison of Two Different Enteral Nutrition Protocol in Critically Ill Patients
    Buyukcoban, Sibel
    Akan, Mert
    Koca, Ugur
    Eglen, Merih Yildiz
    Ciceklioglu, Meltem
    Mavioglu, Omur
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, 2016, 44 (05) : 265 - 269