The effect of viewing distance on subjective refraction assessment

被引:1
|
作者
Kucika, Alina [1 ]
Rumjanceva, Ilona [1 ]
Patrova, Tatjana [1 ]
Svede, Aiga [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Latvia, Dept Optometry & Vis Sci, Fac Phys Math & Optometry, Jelgavas Iela 1, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia
关键词
optometry; viewing distance; subjective refraction; optometric office; visual acuity; VISUAL-ACUITY; ACCOMMODATION; FACILITY; CONTRAST; FOCUS; DEPTH;
D O I
10.3176/proc.2021.4S.02
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Accurate detection of subjective refraction is important to provide patients with the best visual quality. One of the factors affecting detection of subjective refraction is viewing distance. Lack of requirements for optometric office arrangement and required space dimensions leads to smaller optometric offices that provide shorter distance between the patient and the optotype chart. However, the effect of decreased viewing distance on detected subjective refraction remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of viewing distance on the assessment of subjective refraction. Two types of subjective refraction of the dominant eye were determined in 45 participants at five viewing distances (6 m, 5 m, 4 m, 3 m, and 2.5 m): subjective refraction that ensured visual acuity 1.0 (in decimal units) and maximum subjective refraction that ensured the best corrected visual acuity. The results demonstrated that viewing distance significantly affected the outcome of subjective refraction detection; there were hyperopic shifts in all types of refractions that increased as the viewing distance decreased. To conclude, the most appropriate viewing distance for subjective refraction detection is 5 m or 6 m. If viewing distance is reduced to 4 m or less, a negative spherical lens of the corresponding proximity should be added to the obtained subjective refraction as it cannot be reliably stated that ocular accommodation is fully relaxed. Since this is not always achievable by 0.25 D steps, mirror systems should be used in smaller (3 m and closer viewing distances) optometric offices to provide more appropriate subjective refraction detection.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 325
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EFFECT OF WINDOW WIDTH AND VIEWING DISTANCE IN CT DISPLAY
    WARREN, RC
    PANDYA, YV
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1982, 55 (649): : 72 - 74
  • [32] EFFECT OF VIEWING SLANT AND DISTANCE ON SOME VISUAL ILLUSIONS
    HOUSSIADAS, L
    BROWN, LB
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1963, 15 (02) : 108 - &
  • [33] The effect of viewing distance on responses to the pattern glare test
    Monger, Laura J.
    Shah, Dhruvi
    Wilkins, Arnold J.
    Allen, Peter M.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2016, 99 (01) : 47 - 50
  • [34] DISCREPANCY BETWEEN RETINOSCOPIC AND SUBJECTIVE REFRACTION - EFFECT OF LIGHT POLARIZATION
    OLEARY, D
    MILLODOT, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1978, 55 (08): : 553 - 556
  • [35] Comparisons of wavefront refraction, autorefraction, and subjective manifest refraction
    Lin, Hong-Zin
    Chen, Chien-Chung
    Lee, Yuan-Chieh
    TZU CHI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 25 (01): : 43 - 46
  • [36] The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction
    Pesudovs, Konrad
    Parker, Katrina E.
    Cheng, Han
    Applegate, Raymond A.
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2007, 84 (05) : 387 - 392
  • [37] Effects of image characteristics on preferred viewing distance and subjective legibility for reflective liquid crystal displays
    Kubota, Satoru
    Kyokai Joho Imeji Zasshi/Journal of the Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers, 1998, 52 (09): : 1386 - 1390
  • [38] Subjective Refraction - Monocular Alignment
    von Livonius, Bettina
    AUGENHEILKUNDE UP2DATE, 2021, 11 (03) : 195 - 200
  • [39] EUROPEAN TECHNIQUES OF SUBJECTIVE REFRACTION
    FREEMAN, H
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND ARCHIVES OF AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OPTOMETRY, 1970, 47 (11): : 922 - &
  • [40] Lau fringes and subjective refraction
    Avudainayagam, CS
    Avudainayagam, KV
    Atchison, DA
    OPTICS LETTERS, 2002, 27 (07) : 476 - 478