Establishment of Key Performance Indicators for Green Building Operations Monitoring-An Application to China Case Study

被引:13
|
作者
Li, Jinqiu [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Qingqin [1 ,3 ]
Zhou, Hao [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Chongqing 400030, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Tsinghua Tongheng Urban Planning & Design, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[3] China Acad Bldg Res, Beijing 100013, Peoples R China
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Architecture, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[5] Tsinghua Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Eco Planning & Green Bldg, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
green building; operations monitoring; key performance indicators; SMART principle; user behavior; INDOOR ENVIRONMENT QUALITY; OFFICE BUILDINGS; OCCUPANT SATISFACTION; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; SIMULATION; LEED; OPTIMIZATION; BEHAVIORS;
D O I
10.3390/en13040976
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Released green building evaluation standards for operation stage include a huge number of indicators, which are very comprehensive and systematic. However, the indicators of these standards are very complicated and a large amount of time and manpower are consumed for their evaluation. To evaluate the operational performance of green buildings more practically and efficiently, some studies collect the operational data for part of the indicators (mainly focusing on building energy performance, indoor environmental quality or occupant satisfaction), which are too rough to evaluate the performance of green building. This paper proposed a total of 27 key performance indicators (KPIs) for green building operations monitoring. The number of proposed indicators is much fewer than the evaluation standards, as well as suitable for long-term monitoring, which can dramatically reduce evaluation time and cost. On the other hand, the indicators involving Outdoor environmental quality, Indoor environmental quality, HVAC system, P&D system, Renewable energy system, Total resource consumption and User behavior, which are more comprehensive and systematic than the conventional monitoring studies for operational performance of green building. Firstly, an indicators library for operations monitoring of green building was established based on relevant standards and literature review in this field. Secondly, "SMART" principle and Delphi method were adopted to select the key performance indicators for green building operations monitoring. Different background experts regarding green building industry were chosen to screen the most relevant, accessible and measurable indicators. Subsequently, two projects in China were selected for case study of key performance indicators proposed in this paper for green building operations monitoring to validate the feasibility and advancement.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-benefit analysis on green building energy efficiency technology application: A case in China
    Liu, Yuming
    Guo, Xia
    Hu, Feiling
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 82 : 37 - 46
  • [42] New indicators for global crop monitoring in CropWatch - case study in North China Plain
    Wu Bingfang
    Zhang Miao
    Zeng Hongwei
    Liu Guoshui
    Chang Sheng
    Gommes, Rene
    35TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT (ISRSE35), 2014, 17
  • [43] Exploring Enterprise Performance Indicators Network: A Case Study of China Telecommunication Industry
    Shi Wenhua
    Du Yu
    Zhang Xiaohang
    CHINA COMMUNICATIONS, 2012, 9 (12) : 153 - 163
  • [44] The typical application of building energy consumption monitoring and energy management: A case study
    Zhao, Liang
    Liang, Ruobing
    Zhang, Jili
    International Journal of Smart Home, 2015, 9 (01): : 177 - 188
  • [45] Incremental cost-benefit quantitative assessment of green building: A case study in China
    Wu, Zhijiang
    Ma, Guofeng
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2022, 269
  • [46] Decision Support for Green Supply Chain Operations by Integrating Dynamic Simulation and LCA Indicators: Diaper Case Study
    Adhitya, Arief
    Halim, Iskandar
    Srinivasan, Rajagopalan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (23) : 10178 - 10185
  • [47] Development of performance indicators by the Delphi study for foodservice operations in senior welfare centers: application of the balanced scorecard
    Gang, Gyoungok
    Chang, Hyeja
    Lee, Sang-gil
    FOOD SCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 33 (07) : 1727 - 1739
  • [48] Development of performance indicators by the Delphi study for foodservice operations in senior welfare centers: application of the balanced scorecard
    Gyoungok Gang
    Hyeja Chang
    Sang-gil Lee
    Food Science and Biotechnology, 2024, 33 : 1727 - 1739
  • [49] KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR PROJECT MONITORING AND CONTROLLING WITH FOCUS ON RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE - RESEARCH STUDY
    Grigore, Mihaela Carmen
    Ionescu, Sorin
    MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES IN THE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION, 2019, : 512 - 526
  • [50] Quality control of CT systems by automated monitoring of key performance indicators: a two-year study
    Nowik, Patrik
    Bujila, Robert
    Poludniowski, Gavin
    Fransson, Annette
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 16 (04): : 254 - 265