A Review of Cognitive Models in Human Reliability Analysis

被引:44
|
作者
Pan, Xing [1 ]
Lin, Ye [1 ]
He, Congjiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Reliabil & Syst Engn, 37 Xueyuan Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
cognitive model; human reliability analysis; human error; DYNAMIC PROBABILISTIC SIMULATION; COMPLEX SYSTEM ACCIDENTS; OPERATING CREW RESPONSE; HUMAN ERROR; INTENTION FORMATION; DECISION-MAKING; KNOWLEDGE; BEHAVIOR; MAINTENANCE; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1002/qre.2111
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Human error behavior is determined by both environmental and human factors. In particular, psychological and spiritual factors have a decisive impact on human errors. The human cognitive model not only makes a sound exposition of the generation process and mechanism of human erroneous actions but also improves the accuracy and credibility of human reliability analysis (HRA). Therefore, it helps effectively avoid and prevent human errors in industrial fields. This paper highlights the significant role that the cognitive model has played in HRA. Then, based on an analysis of the nature of human behavior and the classifications of common human errors, several typical cognitive models are summarized in the areas of ergonomics, behavioral science, and cognitive engineering, including a cognitive model related to process, an information-processing model, a decision-making and problem-solving process model, and a cognitive simulation model based on computer technology. Then, cognitive models and the corresponding HRA methods that are applied in the fields of reliability engineering, safety engineering, and risk assessment are reviewed. Finally, some directions and challenges are proposed for the future research of cognitive models applied in HRA methods based on the discussion of current cognitive models used in HRA methods. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1299 / 1316
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] HUMAN RELIABILITY: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW
    Shinoda, Diva Tiemi
    Nobrega, Justino
    Esteves, Victor
    Santos, Isaac Luquetti
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HYGIENE (SHO 2022), 2022, : 47 - 54
  • [32] FAMILY OF MODELS FOR MEASURING HUMAN RELIABILITY
    SIEGEL, AI
    WOLF, JJ
    LAUTMAN, MR
    PROCEEDINGS ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 1975, (JAN28): : 110 - 115
  • [33] MODELS OF HUMAN ERROR IN STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY
    LIND, NC
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 1983, 1 (03) : 167 - 175
  • [34] New concepts in human reliability models
    Kolarik, W
    Woldstad, J
    Lu, S
    Lu, H
    1998 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5, 1998, : 4699 - 4703
  • [35] MODELS FOR HUMAN ERROR IN STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY
    NESSIM, MA
    JORDAAN, IJ
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1985, 111 (06): : 1358 - 1376
  • [36] Data-driven models in reliability analysis for tunnel structure: A systematic review
    Qin, Wenbo
    Chen, Elton J.
    Wang, Fan
    Liu, Wenli
    Zhou, Cheng
    TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 152
  • [37] Review and application of Artificial Neural Networks models in reliability analysis of steel structures
    Chojaczyk, A. A.
    Teixeira, A. P.
    Neves, L. C.
    Cardoso, J. B.
    Guedes Soares, C.
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2015, 52 : 78 - 89
  • [38] On the consideration of reliability in the Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA).: A review of basic models
    Parra, C.
    Crespo, A.
    Cortes, R.
    Fygueroa, S.
    SAFETY AND RELIABILITY FOR MANAGING RISK, VOLS 1-3, 2006, : 2203 - +
  • [39] The role of cognitive task analysis in the application of predictive models of human performance
    Kieras, DE
    Meyer, DE
    COGNITIVE TASK ANALYSIS, 2000, : 237 - 260
  • [40] Identifying human failure events for human reliability analysis: A review of gaps and research opportunities
    Levine, Camille S.
    Al-Douri, Ahmad
    Paglioni, Vincent Philip
    Bensi, Michelle
    Groth, Katrina M.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2024, 245