A Review of Cognitive Models in Human Reliability Analysis

被引:44
|
作者
Pan, Xing [1 ]
Lin, Ye [1 ]
He, Congjiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Reliabil & Syst Engn, 37 Xueyuan Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
cognitive model; human reliability analysis; human error; DYNAMIC PROBABILISTIC SIMULATION; COMPLEX SYSTEM ACCIDENTS; OPERATING CREW RESPONSE; HUMAN ERROR; INTENTION FORMATION; DECISION-MAKING; KNOWLEDGE; BEHAVIOR; MAINTENANCE; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1002/qre.2111
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Human error behavior is determined by both environmental and human factors. In particular, psychological and spiritual factors have a decisive impact on human errors. The human cognitive model not only makes a sound exposition of the generation process and mechanism of human erroneous actions but also improves the accuracy and credibility of human reliability analysis (HRA). Therefore, it helps effectively avoid and prevent human errors in industrial fields. This paper highlights the significant role that the cognitive model has played in HRA. Then, based on an analysis of the nature of human behavior and the classifications of common human errors, several typical cognitive models are summarized in the areas of ergonomics, behavioral science, and cognitive engineering, including a cognitive model related to process, an information-processing model, a decision-making and problem-solving process model, and a cognitive simulation model based on computer technology. Then, cognitive models and the corresponding HRA methods that are applied in the fields of reliability engineering, safety engineering, and risk assessment are reviewed. Finally, some directions and challenges are proposed for the future research of cognitive models applied in HRA methods based on the discussion of current cognitive models used in HRA methods. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1299 / 1316
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Issues in benchmarking human reliability analysis methods: A literature review
    Boring, Ronald L.
    Hendrickson, Stacey M. L.
    Forester, John A.
    Tran, Tuan Q.
    Lois, Erasmia
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2010, 95 (06) : 591 - 605
  • [22] A REVIEW OF COGNITIVE TEACHING MODELS
    WILSON, B
    COLE, P
    ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 1991, 39 (04): : 47 - 64
  • [23] ROLE OF FRAMEWORKS, MODELS, DATA, AND JUDGMENT IN HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS.
    Hannaman, G.W.
    Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1985, 93 (2-3) : 295 - 301
  • [25] A Human Reliability Analysis Method based on Cognitive Process Model for Risk Assessment
    Ye, Huimin
    Zheng, Wei
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT RAIL TRANSPORTATION (ICIRT), 2016, : 418 - 424
  • [26] Analysis of Software Reliability Models for Reliability Estimation
    Gupta, Aakash
    Gupta, Neeraj
    Garg, Rakesh
    Kumar, Ramesh
    2019 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLOUD COMPUTING, DATA SCIENCE & ENGINEERING (CONFLUENCE 2019), 2019, : 355 - 358
  • [27] Application of two recently developed human reliability techniques to cognitive error analysis
    Gall, W.
    1600, Publ by Elsevier Science Publ Ltd, Barking, Engl
  • [28] SOFTWARE-RELIABILITY MODELS - A REVIEW
    SHANTHIKUMAR, JG
    MICROELECTRONICS AND RELIABILITY, 1983, 23 (05): : 903 - 943
  • [29] Cognitive dimensions of organisational reliability: a scoping review
    Korbekandi M.M.
    Kazemi S.H.
    Danaeefard H.
    International Journal of Reliability and Safety, 2023, 17 (01) : 55 - 102
  • [30] Learning Mental Models of Human Cognitive Processing by Creating Cognitive Models
    Miwa, Kazuhisa
    Kanzaki, Nana
    Terai, Hitoshi
    Kojima, Kazuaki
    Nakaike, Ryuichi
    Morita, Junya
    Saito, Hitomi
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION, AIED 2015, 2015, 9112 : 287 - 296