A Review of Cognitive Models in Human Reliability Analysis

被引:44
|
作者
Pan, Xing [1 ]
Lin, Ye [1 ]
He, Congjiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Reliabil & Syst Engn, 37 Xueyuan Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
cognitive model; human reliability analysis; human error; DYNAMIC PROBABILISTIC SIMULATION; COMPLEX SYSTEM ACCIDENTS; OPERATING CREW RESPONSE; HUMAN ERROR; INTENTION FORMATION; DECISION-MAKING; KNOWLEDGE; BEHAVIOR; MAINTENANCE; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1002/qre.2111
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Human error behavior is determined by both environmental and human factors. In particular, psychological and spiritual factors have a decisive impact on human errors. The human cognitive model not only makes a sound exposition of the generation process and mechanism of human erroneous actions but also improves the accuracy and credibility of human reliability analysis (HRA). Therefore, it helps effectively avoid and prevent human errors in industrial fields. This paper highlights the significant role that the cognitive model has played in HRA. Then, based on an analysis of the nature of human behavior and the classifications of common human errors, several typical cognitive models are summarized in the areas of ergonomics, behavioral science, and cognitive engineering, including a cognitive model related to process, an information-processing model, a decision-making and problem-solving process model, and a cognitive simulation model based on computer technology. Then, cognitive models and the corresponding HRA methods that are applied in the fields of reliability engineering, safety engineering, and risk assessment are reviewed. Finally, some directions and challenges are proposed for the future research of cognitive models applied in HRA methods based on the discussion of current cognitive models used in HRA methods. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1299 / 1316
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A review of the cognitive basis for human reliability analysis
    Alvarenga, M. A. B.
    Frutuoso e Melo, P. F.
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2019, 117
  • [2] COGNITIVE MODELS FOR HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS APPLICATIONS TO THE OIL & GAS INDUSTRY
    Alvarenga, M. A. B.
    Frutuoso e Melo, P. F.
    Maturana, M. C.
    Martins, M. R.
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 42ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE & ARCTIC ENGINEERING, OMAE2023, VOL 2, 2023,
  • [3] Capturing cognitive causal paths in human reliability analysis with Bayesian network models
    Zwirglmaier, Kilian
    Straub, Daniel
    Groth, Katrina M.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2017, 158 : 117 - 129
  • [4] A review of decision tree models for assessing Human Reliability Analysis dependence
    Podofillini, L.
    Dang, V. N.
    Baraldi, P.
    Conti, M.
    Zio, E.
    RELIABILITY, RISK AND SAFETY: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS VOLS 1-3, 2010, : 253 - 259
  • [5] A critical review of methods and models for evaluating organizational factors in Human Reliability Analysis
    Alvarenga, M. A. B.
    Frutuoso e Melo, P. F.
    Fonseca, R. A.
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2014, 75 : 25 - 41
  • [6] Review of statistical models for ship reliability analysis
    Parunov, J
    Senjanovic, I
    PRACTICAL DESIGN OF SHIPS AND MOBILE UNITS, 1998, 11 : 273 - 280
  • [7] Cognitive modelling: a basic complement of human reliability analysis
    Bersini, U.
    Cacciabue, P.C.
    Mancini, G.
    1600, (22): : 1 - 4
  • [8] Human reliability analysis: A critique and review for managers
    French, Simon
    Bedford, Tim
    Pollard, Simon J. T.
    Soane, Emma
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2011, 49 (06) : 753 - 763
  • [9] COGNITIVE MODELING - A BASIC COMPLEMENT OF HUMAN RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS
    BERSINI, U
    CACCIABUE, PC
    MANCINI, G
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1988, 22 (1-4) : 107 - 128
  • [10] COGNITIVE THEORY, IDENTIFIABILITY AND HUMAN RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS (HRA)
    KANTOWITZ, BH
    FUJITA, Y
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1990, 29 (03) : 317 - 328