Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability

被引:65
|
作者
Tremblay, Sara [1 ,2 ]
Larochelle-Brunet, Felix [1 ]
Lafleur, Louis-Philippe [1 ]
El Mouderrib, Sofia [1 ]
Lepage, Jean-Francois [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Theoret, Hugo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Psychol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] UCL, Inst Neurol, Sobell Dept Motor Neurosci & Movement Disorders, 33 Queen Sq, London WC1N 3BG, England
[3] CHU Sherbrooke, Ctr Rech, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Pediat, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Quebec Trois Rivieres, Trois Rivieres, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
inter-subject variability; motor evoked potential variability; primary motor cortex; transcranial direct current stimulation; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; VARIABILITY; PLASTICITY; HUMANS; MODEL; TDCS;
D O I
10.1111/ejn.13321
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Since the initial demonstration of linear effects of stimulation duration and intensity on the strength of after-effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), few studies have systematically assessed how varying these parameters modulates corticospinal excitability. Therefore, the objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the effects of anodal tDCS on corticospinal excitability at two stimulation intensities (1mA, 2mA) and durations (10min, 20min), and determine the value of several variables in predicting response. Two groups of 20 individuals received, in two separate sessions, 1 and 2mA anodal tDCS (left primary motor cortex (M1)-right supra-orbital montage) for either 10- or 20-min. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered over left M1 and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) of the contralateral hand were recorded prior to tDCS and every 5min for 20-min post-tDCS. The following predictive variables were evaluated: I-wave recruitment, stimulation intensity, baseline M1 excitability and inter-trial MEP variability. Results show that anodal tDCS failed to significantly modulate corticospinal excitability in all conditions. Furthermore, low response rates were identified across all parameter combinations. No baseline measure was significantly correlated with increases in MEP amplitude. However, a decrease in inter-trial MEP variability was linked to response to anodal tDCS. In conclusion, the present findings are consistent with recent reports showing high levels of inter-subject variability in the neurophysiological response to tDCS, which may partly explain inconsistent group results. Furthermore, the level of variability in the neurophysiological outcome measure, i.e. MEPs, appears to be related to response.
引用
收藏
页码:2184 / 2190
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The impact of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex on motor learning in older adults with low levels of activity
    Abedi, Razieh
    Talimkhani, Ailin
    Mohammadzadeh, Zahra
    Daryabor, Aliyeh
    Naimi, Sedigheh Sadat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERAPY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 29 (10):
  • [22] Anodal Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation: The Effects of Pulse Duration on Corticospinal Excitability
    Jaberzadeh, Shapour
    Bastani, Andisheh
    Zoghi, Maryam
    Morgan, Prue
    Fitzgerald, Paul B.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (07):
  • [23] Anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the cerebellum and primary motor cortex improves tardive dyskinesia: A pilot study
    Boechat-Barros, Raphael
    von Glehn, Felipe P.
    Correa, Thiago Xavier
    Brasil-Neto, Joaquim P.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2022, 15 (02) : 488 - 490
  • [24] Exploring and optimizing the neuroplastic effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex of older humans
    Farnad, Leila
    Ghasemian-Shirvan, Ensiyeh
    Mosayebi-Samani, Mohsen
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2021, 14 (03) : 622 - 634
  • [25] Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of motor cortex does not ameliorate spasticity in multiple sclerosis
    Iodice, Rosa
    Dubbioso, Raffaele
    Ruggiero, Lucia
    Santoro, Lucio
    Manganelli, Fiore
    RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 33 (04) : 487 - 492
  • [26] Transcranial direct current stimulation over premotor cortex modifies the excitability of the ipsilateral primary motor and somatosensory cortices
    Kirimoto, Hikari
    Ogata, Katsuya
    Onishi, Hideaki
    Oyama, Mineo
    Goto, Yoshinobu
    Tobimatsu, Shozo
    2009 ICME INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPLEX MEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2009, : 274 - +
  • [27] Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation
    Nitsche, MA
    Paulus, W
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2000, 527 (03): : 633 - 639
  • [28] Cortical Excitability through Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: a Computational Approach
    Arora, Yashika
    Chowdhury, Shubhajit Roy
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2020, 44 (02)
  • [29] Cortical Excitability through Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: a Computational Approach
    Yashika Arora
    Shubhajit Roy Chowdhury
    Journal of Medical Systems, 2020, 44
  • [30] Different Current Intensities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Differentially Modulate Motor Cortex Plasticity
    Kidgell, Dawson J.
    Daly, Robin M.
    Young, Kayleigh
    Lum, Jarrod
    Tooley, Gregory
    Jaberzadeh, Shapour
    Zoghi, Maryam
    Pearce, Alan J.
    NEURAL PLASTICITY, 2013, 2013