Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability

被引:65
|
作者
Tremblay, Sara [1 ,2 ]
Larochelle-Brunet, Felix [1 ]
Lafleur, Louis-Philippe [1 ]
El Mouderrib, Sofia [1 ]
Lepage, Jean-Francois [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Theoret, Hugo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Psychol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] UCL, Inst Neurol, Sobell Dept Motor Neurosci & Movement Disorders, 33 Queen Sq, London WC1N 3BG, England
[3] CHU Sherbrooke, Ctr Rech, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Pediat, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Quebec Trois Rivieres, Trois Rivieres, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
inter-subject variability; motor evoked potential variability; primary motor cortex; transcranial direct current stimulation; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; VARIABILITY; PLASTICITY; HUMANS; MODEL; TDCS;
D O I
10.1111/ejn.13321
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Since the initial demonstration of linear effects of stimulation duration and intensity on the strength of after-effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), few studies have systematically assessed how varying these parameters modulates corticospinal excitability. Therefore, the objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the effects of anodal tDCS on corticospinal excitability at two stimulation intensities (1mA, 2mA) and durations (10min, 20min), and determine the value of several variables in predicting response. Two groups of 20 individuals received, in two separate sessions, 1 and 2mA anodal tDCS (left primary motor cortex (M1)-right supra-orbital montage) for either 10- or 20-min. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered over left M1 and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) of the contralateral hand were recorded prior to tDCS and every 5min for 20-min post-tDCS. The following predictive variables were evaluated: I-wave recruitment, stimulation intensity, baseline M1 excitability and inter-trial MEP variability. Results show that anodal tDCS failed to significantly modulate corticospinal excitability in all conditions. Furthermore, low response rates were identified across all parameter combinations. No baseline measure was significantly correlated with increases in MEP amplitude. However, a decrease in inter-trial MEP variability was linked to response to anodal tDCS. In conclusion, the present findings are consistent with recent reports showing high levels of inter-subject variability in the neurophysiological response to tDCS, which may partly explain inconsistent group results. Furthermore, the level of variability in the neurophysiological outcome measure, i.e. MEPs, appears to be related to response.
引用
收藏
页码:2184 / 2190
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Effects of bilateral anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the tongue primary motor cortex on cortical excitability of the tongue and tongue motor functions
    Maezawa, Hitoshi
    Vicario, Carmelo Mario
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Hirata, Masayuki
    Mima, Tatsuya
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2020, 13 (01) : 270 - 272
  • [12] Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five anodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 24 hours
    Zappasodi, Filippo
    Musumeci, Gabriella
    Navarra, Riccardo
    Di Lazzaro, Vincenzo
    Caulo, Massimo
    Uncini, Antonino
    NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 49 (01): : 19 - 25
  • [13] Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the leg motor cortex
    Jeffery, Dean T.
    Norton, Jonathan A.
    Roy, Francois D.
    Gorassini, Monica A.
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 182 (02) : 281 - 287
  • [14] Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the leg motor cortex
    Dean T. Jeffery
    Jonathan A. Norton
    Francois D. Roy
    Monica A. Gorassini
    Experimental Brain Research, 2007, 182 : 281 - 287
  • [15] Effects of anodal transcranial stimulation on the excitability of motor cortex in hemicerebellectomized rats
    Ben Taib, N. Oulad
    Manto, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2007, 14 : 193 - 193
  • [16] Language training and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex in chronic aphasia
    Floeel, A.
    Darkow, R.
    Meinzer, M.
    51ST ACADEMY OF APHASIA PROCEEDINGS, 2013, 94 : 243 - 244
  • [17] Can genetic polymorphisms predict response variability to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex?
    Pellegrini, Michael
    Zoghi, Maryam
    Jaberzadeh, Shapour
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 53 (05) : 1569 - 1591
  • [18] Improving consolidation by applying anodal transcranial direct current stimulation at primary motor cortex during repetitive practice
    Kim, Taewon
    Kim, Hakjoo
    Wright, David L.
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MEMORY, 2021, 178
  • [19] Does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhance excitability of the motor cortex and motor function in healthy individuals and subjects with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bastani, A.
    Jaberzadeh, S.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 123 (04) : 644 - 657
  • [20] Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over lower limb primary motor cortex on motor learning in healthy individuals
    Foerster, Aguida
    Dutta, Anirban
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Paulus, Walter
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 47 (07) : 779 - 789