Efficacy of a modified-live virus vaccine in pigs experimentally infected with a highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus type 1 (HP-PRRSV-1)

被引:17
|
作者
Canelli, Elena [1 ]
Catella, Alessia [1 ]
Borghetti, Paolo [1 ]
Ferrari, Luca [1 ]
Ognoa, Giulia [1 ]
De Angelis, Elena [1 ]
Bonilauri, Paolo [2 ]
Guazzetti, Stefano [3 ]
Nardini, Roberto [4 ]
Martelli, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Parma, Dept Vet Sci, Str Taglio 10, I-43126 Parma, Italy
[2] IZSLER, Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Lombardia & Emilia, Unit Reggio Emilia, Via Pitagora 2, I-42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy
[3] AUSL Reggio Emilia, Via Giovanni Amendola 2, I-42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy
[4] IZSLT, Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Lazio & Toscana M A, Via Appia Nuova 1411, I-00178 Rome, Italy
关键词
Highly pathogenic PRRSV (HP-PRRSV); Modified-live virus (MLV) vaccine; Heterologous protection; PRRSV VACCINE; CLINICAL-PROTECTION; IMMUNE-RESPONSES; BONE-MARROW; CHALLENGE; STRAIN; ISOLATE; CELLS; PARAMETERS; INTERFERON;
D O I
10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.10.001
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
PARS is one of the main viral diseases in pig production, causing huge economic losses to the swine industry worldwide. The virus shows an intrinsic genomic instability and is able to change continuously, with the emergence of new strains, with different pathogenicity patterns. Commercially available vaccines only partially prevent or counteract the disease and the correlated losses. Moreover, the emergence of highly virulent and pathogenetic isolates represents a particular concern for PARS control and diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a modified-live virus (MLV) PRRSV-1 commercial vaccine in reducing the severity of the disease and minimizing losses upon challenge with a highly pathogenic PRRSV-1.1 Italian isolate (PRRSV-1_PR40/2014). Four different groups were compared: C (unvaccinated-uninfected), VAC-C (vaccinated-uninfected), PR40 (unvaccinated-infected) and VAC-PR40 (vaccinated-infected). The tested vaccine provided partial, but statistically significant clinical, virological and pathological protection after challenge under experimental conditions. In particular, vaccinated animals showed reduced viremia in terms of duration and magnitude, reduced respiratory signs and pathological lesions. Vaccination was able to trigger adaptive immunity able to respond efficiently also against the HP PR40 isolate. Vaccinated animals showed higher average daily weight gain, even during the viremic period, compared to non-vaccinated challenged pigs.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 96
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy of a Modified Live Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus 1 (PRRSV-1) Vaccine against Experimental Infection with PRRSV AUT15-33 in Weaned Piglets
    Duerlinger, Sophie
    Knecht, Christian
    Sawyer, Spencer
    Balka, Gyula
    Zaruba, Marianne
    Ruemenapf, Till
    Kraft, Christian
    Rathkjen, Poul Henning
    Ladinig, Andrea
    VACCINES, 2022, 10 (06)
  • [42] Porcine circovirus type 2 infection decreases the efficacy of a modified live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus vaccine
    Opriessnig, T.
    McKeown, N. E.
    Harmon, K. L.
    Meng, X. J.
    Halbur, P. G.
    CLINICAL AND VACCINE IMMUNOLOGY, 2006, 13 (08) : 923 - 929
  • [43] Improved growth performance by type 2 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)-based modified live vaccine in a herd with concurrent circulation of type 1 and type 2 PRRSV
    Kang, Ikjae
    Kang, Hei Suk
    Jeong, Jiwoon
    Park, Changhoon
    Kim, Seeun
    Choi, Kyuhyung
    Park, Su-Jin
    Hwang, Sung-Min
    Oh, Beomseok
    Kim, Sung-Hoon
    Kang, Byunghak
    Chae, Chanhee
    THAI JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2017, 47 (01): : 109 - 115
  • [44] Cross-protection of a modified-live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)-2 vaccine against a heterologous PRRSV-1 challenge in late-term pregnancy gilts
    Jeong, Jiwoon
    Park, Changhoon
    Oh, Taehwan
    Park, Kee Hwan
    Yang, Siyeon
    Kang, Ikjae
    Park, Su-Jin
    Chae, Chanhee
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 223 : 119 - 125
  • [45] Effect of the Modified Live Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) Vaccine on European and North American PRRSV Shedding in Semen from Infected Boars
    Han, Kiwon
    Seo, Hwi Won
    Shin, Jeoung Hwa
    Oh, Yeonsu
    Kang, Ikjae
    Park, Changhoon
    Chae, Chanhee
    CLINICAL AND VACCINE IMMUNOLOGY, 2011, 18 (10) : 1600 - 1607
  • [46] Effect of the host genotype at a Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) resistance marker on evolution of the modified-live PRRS vaccine virus in pigs
    Rowland, Raymond R. R.
    Doerksen, Tyler
    Lu, Andrea
    Sheahan, Maureen
    Lunney, Joan
    Dekkers, Jack
    Palinski, Rachel M.
    VIRUS RESEARCH, 2022, 316
  • [47] Efficacy evaluation of two commercial modified-live virus vaccines against a novel recombinant type 2 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus
    Sun, Ying-Feng
    Zhou, Lei
    Bian, Ting
    Tian, Xiang-Xue
    Ren, Wei-Ke
    Lu, Chao
    Zhang, Li
    Li, Xiu-Li
    Cui, Mao-Sheng
    Yang, Han-Chun
    Yu, Hai
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 216 : 176 - 182
  • [48] Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Modified Live Virus Vaccine: A "Leaky" Vaccine with Debatable Efficacy and Safety
    Zhou, Lei
    Ge, Xinna
    Yang, Hanchun
    VACCINES, 2021, 9 (04)
  • [49] Determination of antibody induction by highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (HP-PRRSV) vaccine: A comparison of two ELISA kits
    Ge, Meng
    Li, Run-Cheng
    Gong, Wenjie
    Tu, Changchun
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 81 (08): : 1173 - 1176
  • [50] A modified-live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) vaccine protects late-term pregnancy gilts against a heterologous PRRSV-2 challenge
    Yang, Siyeon
    Kang, Ikjae
    Cho, Hyejean
    Oh, Taehwan
    Park, Kee Hwan
    Min, Kyung-Duk
    Chae, Chanhee
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE VETERINAIRE, 2020, 84 (03): : 172 - 180