Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Modified Live Virus Vaccine: A "Leaky" Vaccine with Debatable Efficacy and Safety

被引:71
|
作者
Zhou, Lei [1 ]
Ge, Xinna [1 ]
Yang, Hanchun [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Vet Med, Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Key Lab Anim Epidemiol, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV); modified live virus (MLV) vaccine; attenuation; heterologous cross-protection; safety; reversion to virulence; recombination;
D O I
10.3390/vaccines9040362
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) caused by the PRRS virus (PRRSV) is one of the most economically important diseases, that has significantly impacted the global pork industry for over three decades, since it was first recognized in the United States in the late 1980s. Attributed to the PRRSV extensive genetic and antigenic variation and rapid mutability and evolution, nearly worldwide epidemics have been sustained by a set of emerging and re-emerging virus strains. Since the first modified live virus (MLV) vaccine was commercially available, it has been widely used for more than 20 years, for preventing and controlling PRRS. On the one hand, MLV can induce a protective immune response against homologous viruses by lightening the clinical signs of pigs and reducing the virus transmission in the affected herd, as well as helping to cost-effectively increase the production performance on pig farms affected by heterologous viruses. On the other hand, MLV can still replicate in the host, inducing viremia and virus shedding, and it fails to confer sterilizing immunity against PRRSV infection, that may accelerate viral mutation or recombination to adapt the host and to escape from the immune response, raising the risk of reversion to virulence. The unsatisfied heterologous cross-protection and safety issue of MLV are two debatable characterizations, which raise the concerns that whether it is necessary or valuable to use this leaky vaccine to protect the field viruses with a high probability of being heterologous. To provide better insights into the immune protection and safety related to MLV, recent advances and opinions on PRRSV attenuation, protection efficacy, immunosuppression, recombination, and reversion to virulence are reviewed here, hoping to give a more comprehensive recognition on MLV and to motivate scientific inspiration on novel strategies and approaches of developing the next generation of PRRS vaccine.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of a Spanish modified live virus vaccine against homologous porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection
    Alvarez, E.
    Fernandez-Garcia, A.
    Prieto, C.
    Martinez-Lobo, J.
    Simarro, I.
    Castro, J. M.
    SPANISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2006, 4 (03) : 213 - 220
  • [2] Heterologous vaccine immunogenicity, efficacy, and immune correlates of protection of a modified-live virus porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus vaccine
    Proctor, Jessica
    Wolf, Iman
    Brodsky, David
    Cortes, Lizette M.
    Frias-De-Diego, Alba
    Almond, Glen W.
    Crisci, Elisa
    Watanabe, Tatiane Terumi Negrao
    Hammer, James M.
    Kaeser, Tobias
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [3] Porcine circovirus type 2 infection decreases the efficacy of a modified live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus vaccine
    Opriessnig, T.
    McKeown, N. E.
    Harmon, K. L.
    Meng, X. J.
    Halbur, P. G.
    CLINICAL AND VACCINE IMMUNOLOGY, 2006, 13 (08) : 923 - 929
  • [4] Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of an Attenuated Live Vaccine Based on Highly Pathogenic Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus
    Yu, Xiuling
    Zhou, Zhi
    Cao, Zhen
    Wu, Jiajun
    Zhang, Zhongqiu
    Xu, Baiwan
    Wang, Chuanbin
    Hu, Dongmei
    Deng, Xiaoyu
    Han, Wei
    Gu, Xiaoxue
    Zhang, Shuo
    Li, Xiaoxia
    Wang, Baoyue
    Zhai, Xinyan
    Tian, Kegong
    CLINICAL AND VACCINE IMMUNOLOGY, 2015, 22 (05) : 493 - 502
  • [5] Vaccine efficacy of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus chimeras
    Ellingson, Joshua S.
    Wang, Yue
    Layton, Sarah
    Ciacci-Zanella, Janice
    Roof, Michael B.
    Faaberg, Kay S.
    VACCINE, 2010, 28 (14) : 2679 - 2686
  • [6] Effects of a modified-live virus vaccine against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome in boars
    ChristopherHennings, J
    Nelson, EA
    Nelson, JK
    Benfield, DA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 1997, 58 (01) : 40 - 45
  • [7] Safety of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Modified Live Virus (MLV) vaccine strains in a young pig infection model
    Francisco Javier Martínez-Lobo
    Laura Carrascosa de Lome
    Francisco Díez-Fuertes
    Joaquim Segalés
    Carlos García-Artiga
    Isabel Simarro
    José María Castro
    Cinta Prieto
    Veterinary Research, 44
  • [8] Safety of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Modified Live Virus (MLV) vaccine strains in a young pig infection model
    Javier Martinez-Lobo, Francisco
    Carrascosa de Lome, Laura
    Diez-Fuertes, Francisco
    Segales, Joaquim
    Garcia-Artiga, Carlos
    Simarro, Isabel
    Maria Castro, Jose
    Prieto, Cinta
    VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2013, 44
  • [9] Field efficacy of a novel porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome modified-live virus vaccine with an emphasis on growth performance
    Ham, Sehyeong
    Lee, Hyunjoon
    Suh, Jeongmin
    Kim, Chonghan
    Kwon, Woo Ju
    Park, Gyeong-Seo
    Chae, Chanhee
    VETERINARY MEDICINE AND SCIENCE, 2024, 10 (04)
  • [10] Genomic homology of ORF 5 gene sequence between modified live vaccine virus and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus challenge isolates is not predictive of vaccine efficacy
    Opriessnig, T
    Pallarés, FJ
    Nilubol, D
    Vincent, AL
    Thacker, EL
    Vaughn, EM
    Roof, M
    Halbur, PG
    JOURNAL OF SWINE HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2005, 13 (05): : 246 - 253