Methods for Implementing and Reporting Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) Measures of Symptomatic Adverse Events in Cancer Clinical Trials

被引:72
|
作者
Basch, Ethan [1 ,2 ]
Rogak, Lauren J. [2 ]
Dueck, Amylou C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Canc Outcomes Res Program, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Hlth Outcomes Res Grp, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Biostat Sect, Scottsdale, AZ 85259 USA
关键词
Patient-reported outcome; Symptom; Adverse event; Cancer; Toxicity; Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; COMMON TERMINOLOGY CRITERIA; DATA-COLLECTION; EQUIVALENCE; VERSION; ACCURACY; VOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.011
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Purpose: There is increasing interest to use patient reported outcome (PRO) measures to evaluate symptomatic adverse events (AEs) in cancer treatment trials. However, there are currently no standard recommended approaches for integrating patient-reported AE measures into trials. Methods: Approaches are identified from previous trials for selecting AEs for solicited patient reporting, administering patient-reported AE measures, and analyzing and reporting results. Findings: Approaches for integrating patient reported AE measures into cancer trials generally combine current standard methods for clinician reported AEs and established best practices for using PRO measures. Specific AEs can be selected for a PRO questionnaire based on common and expected reactions in a given trial context, derived from literature review and qualitative/mixed-methods evaluations and should be the same set administered across all arms of a trial. A mechanism for collecting unsolicited patient-reported AEs will also ideally be included. Patients will preferably report at baseline and at the end of active treatment as well as on a frequent standardized schedule during active treatment, such as weekly from home, with a recall period corresponding to the frequency of reporting (eg, past 7 days). Less frequent reporting may be considered after an initial intensive monitoring period for trials of prolonged treatments and during long-term follow-up. Electronic PRO data collection is preferred. Backup data collection for missed PRO reports is advisable to boost response rates. Analysis can use a combination of approaches to AE and PRO data. If a high proportion of patients is experiencing baseline symptoms, systematic subtraction of these from on-study AEs should be considered to improve reporting of symptoms related to treatment. More granular longitudinal analyses of individual symptoms can also be useful. Implications: Methods are evolving for integrating patient-reported symptomatic AEs into cancer trials. These methods are expected to further evolve as more data from trials become available. (C) 2016 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / 830
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] METHODS FOR REPORTING THE PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES VERSION OF THE COMMON TERMINOLOGY CRITERIA FOR ADVERSE EVENTS (PRO-CTCAE) DATA IN CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS
    Zhou, X.
    Eid, D.
    Gnanasakthy, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S226 - S226
  • [2] Clinician-reported symptomatic adverse events in cancer trials: are they concordant with patient-reported outcomes?
    Sparano, Francesco
    Aaronson, Neil K.
    Cottone, Francesco
    Piciocchi, Alfonso
    La Sala, Edoardo
    Anota, Amelie
    Deliu, Nina
    Kieffer, Jacobien M.
    Efficace, Fabio
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (05) : 279 - 288
  • [3] Patient-reported outcomes corresponding to most common symptomatic adverse events in lung cancer clinical trials
    Horodniceanu, Erica
    Datla, Tejaswi
    Larkins, Erin A.
    Singh, Harpreet
    Kluetz, Paul Gustav
    Bhatnagar, Vishal
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [4] Systematic evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) protocol content and reporting in cancer clinical trials: the EPiC study
    Kyte, Derek G.
    Retzer, Ameeta
    Keeley, Thomas
    Ahmed, Khaled
    Armes, Jo
    Brown, Julia M.
    Calman, Lynn
    Copland, Chris
    Efficace, Fabio
    Gavin, Anna
    Glaser, Adam
    Greenfield, Diana M.
    Lanceley, Anne
    Taylor, Rachel M.
    Velikova, Galina
    Brundage, Michael
    Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca
    King, Madeleine T.
    Calvert, Melanie J.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (01) : 55 - 56
  • [5] Systematic evaluation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) protocol content and reporting in cancer clinical trials: the EPiC study
    Kyte, Derek
    Retzer, Ameeta
    Ahmed, Khaled
    Keeley, Thomas
    Armes, Jo
    Brown, Julia M.
    Calman, Lynn
    Efficace, Fabio
    Gavin, Anna
    Glaser, Adam
    Greenfield, Diana M.
    Lanceley, Anne
    Taylor, Rachel M.
    Velikova, Galina
    Brundage, Michael
    Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca
    King, Madeleine T.
    Turner, Grace
    Calvert, Melanie
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 27 : S35 - S35
  • [6] Feasibility Assessment of Patient Reporting of Symptomatic Adverse Events in Multicenter Cancer Clinical Trials
    Basch, Ethan
    Dueck, Amylou C.
    Rogak, Lauren J.
    Minasian, Lori M.
    Kelly, William Kevin
    O'Mara, Ann M.
    Denicoff, Andrea M.
    Seisler, Drew
    Atherton, Pamela J.
    Paskett, Electra
    Carey, Lisa
    Dickler, Maura
    Heist, Rebecca S.
    Himelstein, Andrew
    Rugo, Hope S.
    Sikov, William M.
    Socinski, Mark A.
    Venook, Alan P.
    Weckstein, Douglas J.
    Lake, Diana E.
    Biggs, David D.
    Freedman, Rachel A.
    Kuzma, Charles
    Kirshner, Jeffrey J.
    Schrag, Deborah
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2017, 3 (08) : 1043 - 1050
  • [7] Adverse Event Reporting in Cancer Clinical Trials: Incorporating Patient-Reported Methods. A Systematic Scoping Review
    Grahvendy, Minna
    Brown, Bena
    Wishart, Laurelie R.
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2024, 17 (04): : 335 - 347
  • [8] Gaucher disease (GD)-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures for clinical monitoring and for clinical trials
    Elstein, Deborah
    Klemen, Martin
    Panter, Charlotte
    Bonner, Nicola
    Johnson, Chloe
    Zimran, Ari
    MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM, 2019, 126 (02) : S52 - S52
  • [9] How to Include Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials
    Richard G. McGee
    Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2020, 18 : 480 - 485
  • [10] Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) Measures for Clinical Trials of COPD: The EXACT and E-RS
    Rennard, Stephen
    Leidy, Nancy K.
    Murray, Lindsey T.
    COPD-JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2013, 10 (03) : 393 - 398