Methods for Implementing and Reporting Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) Measures of Symptomatic Adverse Events in Cancer Clinical Trials

被引:72
|
作者
Basch, Ethan [1 ,2 ]
Rogak, Lauren J. [2 ]
Dueck, Amylou C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Canc Outcomes Res Program, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Hlth Outcomes Res Grp, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Biostat Sect, Scottsdale, AZ 85259 USA
关键词
Patient-reported outcome; Symptom; Adverse event; Cancer; Toxicity; Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; COMMON TERMINOLOGY CRITERIA; DATA-COLLECTION; EQUIVALENCE; VERSION; ACCURACY; VOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.011
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Purpose: There is increasing interest to use patient reported outcome (PRO) measures to evaluate symptomatic adverse events (AEs) in cancer treatment trials. However, there are currently no standard recommended approaches for integrating patient-reported AE measures into trials. Methods: Approaches are identified from previous trials for selecting AEs for solicited patient reporting, administering patient-reported AE measures, and analyzing and reporting results. Findings: Approaches for integrating patient reported AE measures into cancer trials generally combine current standard methods for clinician reported AEs and established best practices for using PRO measures. Specific AEs can be selected for a PRO questionnaire based on common and expected reactions in a given trial context, derived from literature review and qualitative/mixed-methods evaluations and should be the same set administered across all arms of a trial. A mechanism for collecting unsolicited patient-reported AEs will also ideally be included. Patients will preferably report at baseline and at the end of active treatment as well as on a frequent standardized schedule during active treatment, such as weekly from home, with a recall period corresponding to the frequency of reporting (eg, past 7 days). Less frequent reporting may be considered after an initial intensive monitoring period for trials of prolonged treatments and during long-term follow-up. Electronic PRO data collection is preferred. Backup data collection for missed PRO reports is advisable to boost response rates. Analysis can use a combination of approaches to AE and PRO data. If a high proportion of patients is experiencing baseline symptoms, systematic subtraction of these from on-study AEs should be considered to improve reporting of symptoms related to treatment. More granular longitudinal analyses of individual symptoms can also be useful. Implications: Methods are evolving for integrating patient-reported symptomatic AEs into cancer trials. These methods are expected to further evolve as more data from trials become available. (C) 2016 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / 830
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The CONSORT Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) extension: implications for clinical trials and practice
    Melanie Calvert
    Michael Brundage
    Paul B Jacobsen
    Holger J Schünemann
    Fabio Efficace
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11
  • [32] Current practices in patient-reported outcome (PRO) alert management in clinical trials
    Kyte, Derek
    Ives, Jonathan
    Draper, Heather
    Calvert, Melanie
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 : 13 - 13
  • [33] Systematic Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Protocol Content and Reporting in Cancer Trials
    Kyte, Derek
    Retzer, Ameeta
    Ahmed, Khaled
    Keeley, Thomas
    Armes, Jo
    Brown, Julia M.
    Calman, Lynn
    Gavin, Anna
    Glaser, Adam W.
    Greenfield, Diana M.
    Lanceley, Anne
    Taylor, Rachel M.
    Velikova, Galina
    Brundage, Michael
    Efficace, Fabio
    Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca
    King, Madeleine T.
    Turner, Grace
    Calvert, Melanie
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2019, 111 (11): : 1170 - 1178
  • [34] A LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME (PRO) AND OBSERVER-REPORTED OUTCOME (OBSRO) MEASURES USED IN CLINICAL TRIALS FOR ATOPIC DERMATITIS (AD)
    Ruban, C.
    Tennant, L.
    Burgess, S. M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S176 - S176
  • [35] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Research
    Weinfurt, Kevin P.
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 328 (05): : 472 - 473
  • [36] Considerations and Challenges in Selecting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Clinical Trials in Nephrology
    Ju, Angela
    Tong, Allison
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 12 (11): : 1882 - 1884
  • [37] International guidance on the selection of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical trials: a review
    Norah L. Crossnohere
    Michael Brundage
    Melanie J. Calvert
    Madeleine King
    Bryce B. Reeve
    Elissa Thorner
    Albert W. Wu
    Claire Snyder
    Quality of Life Research, 2021, 30 : 21 - 40
  • [38] International guidance on the selection of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical trials: a review
    Crossnohere, Norah L.
    Brundage, Michael
    Calvert, Melanie J.
    King, Madeleine
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    Thorner, Elissa
    Wu, Albert W.
    Snyder, Claire
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (01) : 21 - 40
  • [39] Utilization of patient-reported outcome measures in plastic surgery clinical trials: A review
    Foppiani, Jose
    Alvarez, Angelica Hernandez
    Stearns, Stephen A.
    Taritsa, Iulianna C.
    Weidman, Allan A.
    Valentine, Lauren
    Escobar-Domingo, Maria J.
    Foster, Lacey
    Schuster, Kirsten A.
    Ho, Olivia A.
    Rinker, Brian
    Lee, Bernard T.
    Lin, Samuel J.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2024, 90 : 215 - 223
  • [40] CONTEMPORARY TRENDS IN USE OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES OF HEALTH IN CLINICAL TRIALS
    Kuharic, M.
    Zecic, F.
    Pickard, A. S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S252 - S253