I-GEL™ VS. AURAONCE™ LARYNGEAL MASK FOR GENERAL ANAESTHESIA WITH CONTROLLED VENTILATION IN PARALYZED PATIENTS

被引:17
|
作者
Donaldson, William [1 ]
Abraham, Alexander [1 ]
Deighan, Mairead [2 ]
Michalek, Pavel [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Antrim Area Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Antrim BT41 2RL, North Ireland
[2] Royal Victoria Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Belfast BT12 6BA, Antrim, North Ireland
[3] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 1, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Prague 12808 2, Czech Republic
[4] Gen Univ Hosp, Prague 12808 2, Czech Republic
来源
BIOMEDICAL PAPERS-OLOMOUC | 2011年 / 155卷 / 02期
关键词
Laryngeal mask; Intermittent positive-pressure ventilation; Airway pressure; Postoperative complications; SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICE; I-GEL; DIFFICULT AIRWAY; ESOPHAGEAL VENT; LMA-UNIQUE; ASPIRATION; PRESSURE; ROCURONIUM; PROSEAL; CUFF;
D O I
10.5507/bp.2011.023
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Aims. The i-gel (TM) and the AuraOnce (TM) laryngeal mask are supraglottic airway devices used for airway management during general anaesthesia. Both devices are cheap, disposable and widely used. They may be used with both spontaneous and controlled ventilation. This study compared differences in the seal and peak pressures, and postoperative complications in these devices when used in paralyzed patients under controlled ventilation. Methods. A prospective randomized trial was designed to compare the igel (TM) and the AuraOnce (TM) in paralyzed adult patients under conditions of controlled ventilation. Two hundred and four patients (ASA class 1-3, age 18-89, weight 46-115 kg) were enrolled in the study. Standardized anaesthesia (fentanyl, propofol and sevoflurane in air-oxygen) was administered including neuromuscular blockade. The primary outcome measure was the difference in seal airway pressures between the two devices. Secondary outcome measures included peak airway pressures, insertion data and postoperative profiles - the incidence of sore throat, swallowing difficulties, numb tongue, hearing difficulties, neck pain, nausea and vomiting. Results. First time insertions were 85.6% (i-gel) and 82% (AuraOnce) with overall success rates 96.3% (i-gel) and 94.2% (AuraOnce) (p=0.54). Average insertion times were 11.0 s (i-gel) and 11.6 s (AuraOnce) (p=0.19). Seal pressures were 30.4 cmH(2)O (i-gel) and 27.8 cmH(2)O (AuraOnce) (p=0.007). Peak pressures were 15.3 cmH(2)O (i-gel) and 15.6 cmH(2)O (AuraOnce) (p=0.57). Traumatic insertion occurred in 5.8% of igel (TM) and 2% of AuraOnce (TM) insertions. The overall incidence of postoperative complications was low, with the i-gel (TM) causing less sore throat and difficulty swallowing at 24h. Conclusion. Both devices provided effective seals for ventilation under positive pressure. I-gel (TM) may be a better alternative for the procedures with controlled ventilation because of higher seal pressures and lower incidence of sore throat postoperatively.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 163
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Randomized comparison of laryngeal tube with classic laryngeal mask airway for anaesthesia with controlled ventilation
    Cook, TM
    McCormick, B
    Asai, T
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 91 (03) : 373 - 378
  • [42] To Compare the Frequency of Postoperative Sore Throat with I-Gel Versus Laryngeal Mask Airway in patients undergoing General Surgery under General Anesthesia
    Kamal, Muhammad Junaid Ahmed
    Zaheer, Baber
    Durrani, Naveed Ahmed
    Ahmad, Khaleel
    Tabassam, Sumara
    Rashid, Zakariya
    Nishat, Mufassar
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 15 (12): : 3232 - 3235
  • [43] Comparison of the i-gel™ and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic™ in terms of clinical performance
    Polat, Reyhan
    Aydin, Gozde Bumin
    Ergil, Julide
    Sayin, Murat
    Kokulu, Tugba
    Ozturk, Ibrahim
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2015, 65 (05): : 343 - 348
  • [44] Comparing Ambu AuraGain TM Disposable Laryngeal Mask with i-gel TM as a conduit for fibreoptic guided tracheal intubation for elective surgery under general anaesthesia in adult patients
    Raj, Deepak
    Bathla, Sapna
    Krishna, Bhavya
    Wason, Rama
    Girdhar, K. K.
    TRENDS IN ANAESTHESIA AND CRITICAL CARE, 2024, 55
  • [45] Comparison of the Intersurgical SolusTM laryngeal mask airway and the i-gel supralaryngeal device
    Amini, S.
    Khoshfetrat, M.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 65 (08) : 805 - 809
  • [46] A randomized comparison of the i-gel and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients: performance and fiberoptic findings
    Fukuhara, Aya
    Okutani, Ryu
    Oda, Yutaka
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2013, 27 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [47] A randomized comparison of the i-gel and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients: performance and fiberoptic findings
    Aya Fukuhara
    Ryu Okutani
    Yutaka Oda
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2013, 27 : 1 - 6
  • [48] Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of I-gel™ and Blockbuster™ laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized pediatric patients
    Selvin, Caren Candace
    Singariya, Geeta
    Bihani, Pooja
    Kamal, Manoj
    Paliwal, Naveen
    Ujwal, Shobha
    ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2023, 18 (01): : 51 - 56
  • [49] Remifentanil vs. fentanyl during rigid bronchoscopy under general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation
    Voyagis, GS
    Dimitriou, V
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 17 (06) : 404 - +
  • [50] A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway ProSealTM and the laryngeal tube airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation
    Brimacombe, J
    Keller, C
    Brimacombe, L
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 95 (03): : 770 - 776