Discriminating Quantum States with Quantum Machine Learning

被引:1
|
作者
Quiroga, David [1 ]
Date, Prasanna [2 ]
Pooser, Raphael [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antioquia, Engn Fac, Medellin, Colombia
[2] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Comp Sci & Math, Oak Ridge, TN USA
[3] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Computat Sci & Engn, Oak Ridge, TN USA
关键词
Quantum Computing; Machine Learning; Quantum Machine Learning; K-Means; QK-Means; Crosstalk;
D O I
10.1109/ICRC53822.2021.00018
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms have obtained great relevance in the machine learning (ML) field due to the promise of quantum speedups when performing basic linear algebra subroutines (BLAS), a fundamental element in most ML algorithms. By making use of BLAS operations, we propose, implement and analyze a quantum k-means (qk-means) algorithm with a low time complexity of O(NKlog(D)I/C) to apply it to the fundamental problem of discriminating quantum states at readout. Discriminating quantum states allows the identification of quantum states vertical bar 0 > and vertical bar 1 > from low-level in-phase and quadrature signal (IQ) data, and can be done using custom ML models. In order to reduce dependency on a classical computer, we use the qk-means to perform state discrimination on the IBMQ Bogota device and managed to find assignment fidelities of up to 98.7% that were only marginally lower than that of the k-means algorithm. We also performed a cross-talk benchmark on the quantum device by applying both algorithms to perform state discrimination on a combination of quantum states and using Pearson Correlation coefficients and assignment fidelities of discrimination results to conclude on the presence of cross-talk on qubits. Evidence shows cross-talk in the (1, 2) and (2, 3) neighboring qubit couples for the analyzed device.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 63
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quantum geometric machine learning for quantum circuits and control
    Perrier, Elija
    Tao, Dacheng
    Ferrie, Chris
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2020, 22 (10)
  • [32] Generalization in Quantum Machine Learning: A Quantum Information Standpoint
    Banchi, Leonardo
    Pereira, Jason
    Pirandola, Stefano
    PRX QUANTUM, 2021, 2 (04):
  • [33] Quantum state tomography using quantum machine learning
    Innan, Nouhaila
    Siddiqui, Owais Ishtiaq
    Arora, Shivang
    Ghosh, Tamojit
    Kocak, Yasemin Poyraz
    Paragas, Dominic
    Galib, Abdullah Al Omar
    Khan, Muhammad Al-Zafar
    Bennai, Mohamed
    QUANTUM MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 6 (01)
  • [34] Enhanced Quantum Synchronization via Quantum Machine Learning
    Cardenas-Lopez, Francisco A.
    Sanz, Mikel
    Retamal, Juan Carlos
    Solano, Enrique
    ADVANCED QUANTUM TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 2 (7-8)
  • [35] Blind Quantum Machine Learning with Quantum Bipartite Correlator
    Li, Changhao
    Li, Boning
    Amer, Omar
    Shaydulin, Ruslan
    Chakrabarti, Shouvanik
    Wang, Guoqing
    Xu, Haowei
    Tang, Hao
    Schoch, Isidor
    Kumar, Niraj
    Lim, Charles
    Li, Ju
    Cappellaro, Paola
    Pistoia, Marco
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2024, 133 (12)
  • [36] Quantum neural network: Prospects for quantum machine learning
    Matsui N.
    Journal of Japan Institute of Electronics Packaging, 2020, 23 (02) : 139 - 144
  • [37] Is Quantum Advantage the Right Goal for Quantum Machine Learning?
    Schuld, Maria
    Killoran, Nathan
    PRX QUANTUM, 2022, 3 (03):
  • [38] Benefits of Open Quantum Systems for Quantum Machine Learning
    Olivera-Atencio, Maria Laura
    Lamata, Lucas
    Casado-Pascual, Jesus
    ADVANCED QUANTUM TECHNOLOGIES, 2023,
  • [39] HASM quantum machine learning
    Yue, Tianxiang
    Wu, Chenchen
    Liu, Yi
    Du, Zhengping
    Zhao, Na
    Jiao, Yimeng
    Xu, Zhe
    Shi, Wenjiao
    SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES, 2023, 66 (09) : 1937 - 1945
  • [40] Quantum Driven Machine Learning
    Saini, Shivani
    Khosla, P. K.
    Kaur, Manjit
    Singh, Gurmohan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 59 (12) : 4013 - 4024