The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire

被引:1359
|
作者
Roland, M
Fairbank, J
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Natl Primary Care Res & Dev Ctr, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Nuffield Orthopaed Ctr, Oxford OX3 7LD, England
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00007632-200012150-00006
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Condition-specific health status measures are commonly used as outcome measures in clinical trials and to assess patient progress in routine clinical practice. The expert panel that met to discuss this special issue of Spine recommended that, when possible, a condition-specific measure for back pain should be chosen from two widely used measures, the Poland-Morris Disability Questionnaire(106) (RDQ) or the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).(30) These two measures have been used in a wide variety of situations over many years, and each is available in a number of languages. In this article, the authors describe these two instruments and provide evidence of their validity and reliability and some comparative results obtained with the use of the two questionnaires. The instruments themselves are included in the appendixes. When used in the forms reproduced in the appendixes, no permission is required from the authors or from Spine. Other back pain-specific health status measures are described by Kopec elsewhere in this edition of Spine.(67)
引用
收藏
页码:3115 / 3124
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Revised Oswestry Disability Questionnaire
    Fairbank, J
    SPINE, 2000, 25 (19) : 2552 - 2552
  • [42] WHICH ROLAND-MORRIS DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE? RASCH ANALYSIS OF FOUR DIFFERENT VERSIONS TESTED IN A NORWEGIAN POPULATION
    Grotle, Margreth
    Wilkens, Philip
    Garratt, Andrew M.
    Scheel, Inger
    Storheim, Kjersti
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2013, 45 (07) : 670 - 677
  • [43] Comparison of the Functional Rating Index and the 18-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire: Responsiveness and reliability
    Chansirinukor, W
    Maher, CG
    Latimer, J
    Hush, J
    SPINE, 2005, 30 (01) : 141 - 145
  • [44] Validation of the Tunisian version of the Roland-Morris questionnaire
    Bejia, I
    Younes, M
    Kamel, BS
    Letaief, M
    Touzi, M
    Soltani, M
    Bergaoui, N
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2005, 14 (02) : 171 - 174
  • [45] Validation of the Spanish version of the Roland-Morris Questionnaire
    Kovacs, FM
    Llobera, J
    del Real, MTG
    Abraira, V
    Gestoso, M
    Fernández, C
    SPINE, 2002, 27 (05) : 538 - 542
  • [46] Item Response Theory Analysis of the Modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire in a Population-Based Study
    Mielenz, Thelma J.
    Carey, Timothy S.
    Edwards, Michael C.
    SPINE, 2015, 40 (06) : E366 - E371
  • [47] Validation of the Tunisian version of the Roland-Morris questionnaire
    Ismail Bejia
    Mohamed Younes
    Ben Sallem Kamel
    Mondher Letaief
    Mongi Touzi
    Mohamed Soltani
    Naceur Bergaoui
    European Spine Journal, 2005, 14 : 171 - 174
  • [48] Validation of the Tunisian version of the Roland-Morris questionnaire
    Ismail, B
    Zrour, S
    Touzi, M
    Bergaoui, N
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2003, 62 : 534 - 534
  • [49] Initial validation of a modified version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) in a general chronic pain population
    Senske, J.
    Harris, M.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2013, 14 (04): : S2 - S2
  • [50] Responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in Italian subjects with sub-acute and chronic low back pain
    Marco Monticone
    Paola Baiardi
    Carla Vanti
    Silvano Ferrari
    Paolo Pillastrini
    Raffaele Mugnai
    Calogero Foti
    European Spine Journal, 2012, 21 : 122 - 129