The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire

被引:1359
|
作者
Roland, M
Fairbank, J
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Natl Primary Care Res & Dev Ctr, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Nuffield Orthopaed Ctr, Oxford OX3 7LD, England
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00007632-200012150-00006
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Condition-specific health status measures are commonly used as outcome measures in clinical trials and to assess patient progress in routine clinical practice. The expert panel that met to discuss this special issue of Spine recommended that, when possible, a condition-specific measure for back pain should be chosen from two widely used measures, the Poland-Morris Disability Questionnaire(106) (RDQ) or the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).(30) These two measures have been used in a wide variety of situations over many years, and each is available in a number of languages. In this article, the authors describe these two instruments and provide evidence of their validity and reliability and some comparative results obtained with the use of the two questionnaires. The instruments themselves are included in the appendixes. When used in the forms reproduced in the appendixes, no permission is required from the authors or from Spine. Other back pain-specific health status measures are described by Kopec elsewhere in this edition of Spine.(67)
引用
收藏
页码:3115 / 3124
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Differential item functioning impact in a modified version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
    Crane, Paul K.
    Cetin, Karynsa
    Cook, Karon F.
    Johnson, Kurt
    Deyo, Richard
    Amtmann, Dagmar
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2007, 16 (06) : 981 - 990
  • [22] Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire analysis of chronic low back pain therapy
    Geba, GP
    Straus, W
    Petruschke, RA
    Bohidar, NR
    CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2003, 24 : 178S - 178S
  • [23] Are the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index interchangeable in patients after lumbar spinal fusion?
    Kersten, R. F. M. R.
    Fikkers, J.
    Wolterbeek, N.
    Oner, F. C.
    van Gaalen, S. M.
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 34 (04) : 605 - 611
  • [24] Responsiveness of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire: consequences of using different external criteria
    Kuijer, W
    Brouwer, S
    Dijkstra, PU
    Jorritsma, W
    Groothoff, JW
    Geertzen, JHB
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2005, 19 (05) : 488 - 495
  • [25] Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: Which Has Superior Measurement Properties in Older Adults With Low Back Pain?
    Jenks, Alan
    Hoekstra, Trynke
    van Tulder, Maurits
    Ostelo, Raymond W.
    Rubinstein, Sidney M.
    Chiarotto, Alessandro
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2022, 52 (07): : 457 - 469
  • [26] Validation of the Turkish version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for use in low back pain
    Küçükdeveci, AA
    Tennant, A
    Elhan, AH
    Niyazoglu, H
    SPINE, 2001, 26 (24) : 2738 - 2743
  • [27] Predicting EQ-5D-5L Utility Scores from the Oswestry Disability Index and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for Low Back Pain
    Poder, Thomas G.
    Carrier, Nathalie
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2020, 13 : 623 - 631
  • [28] Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Argentinean version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
    Scharovsky, Anibal
    Pueyrredon, Manuel
    Craig, Debora
    Rivas, Maria Elisa
    Converso, Gabriel
    Pueyrredon, Julio H.
    Salvat, Fernando
    Alzua, Oscar
    SPINE, 2008, 33 (12) : 1391 - 1395
  • [29] Translation, adaptation and validation of the Roland-Morris questionnaire - Brazil Roland-Morris
    Nusbaum, L
    Natour, J
    Ferraz, MB
    Goldenberg, J
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2001, 34 (02) : 203 - 210
  • [30] Predicting SF-6Dv2 utility scores for chronic low back pain using the Oswestry Disability Index and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
    Poder, Thomas G.
    Carrier, Nathalie
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01) : 105 - 110