Detection and Classification of Calcifications on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and 2D Digital Mammography: A Comparison

被引:202
|
作者
Spangler, M. Lee [1 ]
Zuley, Margarita L. [2 ]
Sumkin, Jules H. [2 ]
Abrams, Gordan [2 ]
Ganott, Marie A. [2 ]
Hakim, Christiane [2 ]
Perrin, Ronald [2 ]
Chough, Denise M. [2 ]
Shah, Ratan [2 ]
Gur, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
calcifications; digital breast tomosynthesis; digital mammography; SCREEN-FILM MAMMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; OBSERVER; RISK;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.10.4656
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to compare the ability of digital breast tomosynthesis and full field digital mammography (FFDM) to detect and characterize calcifications. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred paired examinations were performed utilizing FFDM and digital breast tomosynthesis. Twenty biopsy-proven cancers, 40 biopsy-proven benign calcifications, and 40 randomly selected negative screening studies were retrospectively reviewed by five radiologists in a crossed multireader multimodal observer performance study. Data collected included the presence of calcifications and forced BI-RADS scores. Receiver operator curve analysis using BI-RADS was performed. RESULTS. Overall calcification detection sensitivity was higher for FFDM (0.84% [95% CI, 0.79-0.88%]) than for digital breast tomosynthesis (0.75% [95% CI, 0.70-0.80%]). In the cancer cohort, 75 (76%) of 99 interpretations identified calcification in both modes. Of those, a BI-RADS score less than or equal to 2 was rendered in three (4%) and nine (12%) cases with FFDM and digital breast tomosynthesis, respectively. In the benign cohort, 123 (62%) of 200 interpretations identified calcifications in both modes. Of those, a BI-RADS score greater than or equal to 3 was assigned in 105 (85%) and 93 (76%) cases with FFDM and digital breast tomosynthesis, respectively. There was no significant difference in the nonparametric computed area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) using the BI-RADS scores (FFDM, AUC = 0.76 and SD = 0.03; digital breast tomosynthesis, AUC = 0.72 and SD = 0.04 [p = 0.1277]). CONCLUSION. In this small data set, FFDM appears to be slightly more sensitive than digital breast tomosynthesis for the detection of calcification. However, diagnostic performance as measured by area under the curve using BI-RADS was not significantly different. With improvements in processing algorithms and display, digital breast tomosynthesis could potentially be improved for this purpose.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 324
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Detection and Classification of Calcification on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and 2D Digital Mammography: A Comparison
    Spangler, M.
    Zuley, M.
    Sumkin, J.
    Abrams, G.
    Ganott, M.
    Hakim, C.
    Perrin, R.
    Shah, R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (05)
  • [3] Comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography using a hybrid performance test
    Cockmartin, Lesley
    Marshall, Nicholas W.
    Van Ongeval, Chantal
    Aerts, Gwen
    Stalmans, Davina
    Zanca, Federica
    Shaheen, Eman
    De Keyzer, Frederik
    Dance, David R.
    Young, Kenneth C.
    Bosmans, Hilde
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (10): : 3939 - 3958
  • [4] Comparison of synthetic and digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis or alone for the detection and classification of microcalcifications
    Choi, Ji Soo
    Han, Boo-Kyung
    Ko, Eun Young
    Kim, Ga Ram
    Ko, Eun Sook
    Park, Ko Woon
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) : 319 - 329
  • [5] Comparison of synthetic and digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis or alone for the detection and classification of microcalcifications
    Ji Soo Choi
    Boo-Kyung Han
    Eun Young Ko
    Ga Ram Kim
    Eun Sook Ko
    Ko Woon Park
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 319 - 329
  • [6] Breast microcalcification classification: From 2D mammography to 3D digital breast tomosynthesis
    Yeh, Jinn-Yi
    Chan, Siwa
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 18 : 43 - 43
  • [7] Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion
    Elizabeth H. Dibble
    Ana P. Lourenco
    Grayson L. Baird
    Robert C. Ward
    A. Stanley Maynard
    Martha B. Mainiero
    European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 3 - 10
  • [8] Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion
    Dibble, Elizabeth H.
    Lourenco, Ana P.
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Ward, Robert C.
    Maynard, A. Stanley
    Mainiero, Martha B.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [9] A COMPARISON OF DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS AND FULL FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY IN THE DETECTION OF BREAST CANCER
    Moradzadeh, A.
    Bassett, L. W.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 61 (01) : 128 - 128
  • [10] Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography for Detection of Breast Cancer in Kuwaiti Women
    Asbeutah, Akram M.
    Karmani, Nouralhuda
    Asbeutah, AbdulAziz A.
    Echreshzadeh, Yasmin A.
    AlMajran, Abdullah A.
    Al-Khalifah, Khalid H.
    MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2019, 28 (01) : 10 - 15