Detection and Classification of Calcifications on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and 2D Digital Mammography: A Comparison

被引:202
|
作者
Spangler, M. Lee [1 ]
Zuley, Margarita L. [2 ]
Sumkin, Jules H. [2 ]
Abrams, Gordan [2 ]
Ganott, Marie A. [2 ]
Hakim, Christiane [2 ]
Perrin, Ronald [2 ]
Chough, Denise M. [2 ]
Shah, Ratan [2 ]
Gur, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
calcifications; digital breast tomosynthesis; digital mammography; SCREEN-FILM MAMMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; OBSERVER; RISK;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.10.4656
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to compare the ability of digital breast tomosynthesis and full field digital mammography (FFDM) to detect and characterize calcifications. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred paired examinations were performed utilizing FFDM and digital breast tomosynthesis. Twenty biopsy-proven cancers, 40 biopsy-proven benign calcifications, and 40 randomly selected negative screening studies were retrospectively reviewed by five radiologists in a crossed multireader multimodal observer performance study. Data collected included the presence of calcifications and forced BI-RADS scores. Receiver operator curve analysis using BI-RADS was performed. RESULTS. Overall calcification detection sensitivity was higher for FFDM (0.84% [95% CI, 0.79-0.88%]) than for digital breast tomosynthesis (0.75% [95% CI, 0.70-0.80%]). In the cancer cohort, 75 (76%) of 99 interpretations identified calcification in both modes. Of those, a BI-RADS score less than or equal to 2 was rendered in three (4%) and nine (12%) cases with FFDM and digital breast tomosynthesis, respectively. In the benign cohort, 123 (62%) of 200 interpretations identified calcifications in both modes. Of those, a BI-RADS score greater than or equal to 3 was assigned in 105 (85%) and 93 (76%) cases with FFDM and digital breast tomosynthesis, respectively. There was no significant difference in the nonparametric computed area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) using the BI-RADS scores (FFDM, AUC = 0.76 and SD = 0.03; digital breast tomosynthesis, AUC = 0.72 and SD = 0.04 [p = 0.1277]). CONCLUSION. In this small data set, FFDM appears to be slightly more sensitive than digital breast tomosynthesis for the detection of calcification. However, diagnostic performance as measured by area under the curve using BI-RADS was not significantly different. With improvements in processing algorithms and display, digital breast tomosynthesis could potentially be improved for this purpose.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 324
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Calcifications in the Breast and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Kopans, Daniel
    Gavenonis, Sara
    Halpern, Elkan
    Moore, Richard
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2011, 17 (06): : 638 - 644
  • [22] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis With Synthetic Mammography: Are We Missing Calcifications That Matter?
    Nguyen, Adrien
    Mirchandani, Anicia
    Joseph, Sumita
    Mapkar, Zaiba
    Singh, Evita
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2023, 5 (06) : 666 - 674
  • [23] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Hovda, Tone
    Holen, Asne S.
    Lee, Christoph I.
    Albertsen, Judy
    Bjorndal, Hilde
    Brandal, Siri H. B.
    Gullien, Randi
    Lomo, Jon
    Park, Daehoon
    Romundstad, Linda
    Suhrke, Pal
    Vigeland, Einar
    Skaane, Per
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 287 (03) : 787 - 794
  • [24] A comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of breast cancers
    Woo Jung Choi
    Hak Hee Kim
    Sun Young Lee
    Eun Young Chae
    Hee Jung Shin
    Joo Hee Cha
    Byung Ho Son
    Sei Hyun Ahn
    Young-Wook Choi
    Breast Cancer, 2016, 23 : 886 - 892
  • [25] Digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of mass classification using 3D slices and 2D projection views
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    Wu, Yi-Ta
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Zhang, Yiheng
    Wei, Jun
    Moore, Richard H.
    Kopans, Daniel B.
    Helvie, Mark A.
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir
    Way, Ted
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, 6915
  • [26] A comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of breast cancers
    Choi, Woo Jung
    Kim, Hak Hee
    Lee, Sun Young
    Chae, Eun Young
    Shin, Hee Jung
    Cha, Joo Hee
    Son, Byung Ho
    Ahn, Sei Hyun
    Choi, Young-Wook
    BREAST CANCER, 2016, 23 (06) : 886 - 892
  • [27] The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis
    Shaheen, Eman
    Van Ongeval, Chantal
    Zanca, Federica
    Cockmartin, Lesley
    Marshall, Nicholas
    Jacobs, Jurgen
    Young, Kenneth C.
    R. Dance, David
    Bosmans, Hilde
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (12) : 6659 - 6671
  • [28] COMPARISON BETWEEN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY AND DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST CANCER
    Jari, Irina
    Naum, A. G.
    Gheorghe, Liliana
    Negru, D.
    Ursaru, Manuela
    MEDICAL-SURGICAL JOURNAL-REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALA, 2019, 123 (01): : 102 - 108
  • [29] The simulation of 3D mass models in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis
    Shaheen, Eman
    De Keyzer, Frederik
    Bosmans, Hilde
    Dance, David R.
    Young, Kenneth C.
    Van Ongeval, Chantal
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (08) : 383 - 399
  • [30] Two-view 2D digital mammography versus one-view digital breast tomosynthesis
    MJ Michell
    RK Wasan
    A Iqbal
    C Peacock
    DR Evans
    JC Morel
    Breast Cancer Research, 12