Quality by Design and Process Analytical Technology for Sterile Products-Where Are We Now?

被引:25
|
作者
Riley, Bryan S. [1 ]
Li, Xuhong [1 ]
机构
[1] FDA, CDER, Off Pharmaceut Sci, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
来源
AAPS PHARMSCITECH | 2011年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
process analytical technology (PAT); quality by design (QbD); sterile product;
D O I
10.1208/s12249-010-9566-x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Quality by design (QbD) and process analytical technology (PAT) have become priorities for the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Numerous recent initiatives within CDER and FDA have had the objective of encouraging the pharmaceutical industry to utilize QbD and PAT in their product development and manufacturing processes. Although sterile products may be a minority compared to non-sterile dosage forms (e.g., solid orals), their absolute requirement for sterility make design and control of the manufacturing processes extremely critical. This emphasis on the manufacturing process makes the sterile drug product an obvious target for QbD and PAT. Although the FDA encourages QbD submissions, the utilization of QbD and PAT for sterile products so far is still limited. This paper will examine the present state of QbD and PAT for sterile products and review some examples currently in use. Additional potential applications of QbD and PAT for sterile product development and manufacturing will also be discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 118
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Regulating the Advertising and Promotion of Tobacco Products: Where Are We Now?
    Fulmer, Christopher T.
    FOOD AND DRUG LAW JOURNAL, 2021, 76 (03) : 381 - 397
  • [22] Ebola virus convalescent blood products: Where we are now and where we may need to go
    Burnouf, Thierry
    Seghatchian, Jerard
    TRANSFUSION AND APHERESIS SCIENCE, 2014, 51 (02) : 120 - 125
  • [23] Quality by design, process analytical technology, GMP and regulatory affairs
    Celik, Metin
    PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 23 (06) : 553 - 553
  • [24] Quality assessment in surgery: where do we stand now and where should we be heading?
    Weyers, S.
    Van Calenbergh, S.
    Van Nieuwenhove, Y.
    Mestdagh, G.
    Coppens, M.
    Bosteels, J.
    GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2014, 11 (02) : 89 - 95
  • [25] Technology Interventions to Manage Food Intake: Where Are We Now?
    Allman-Farinelli, Margaret
    Gemming, Luke
    CURRENT DIABETES REPORTS, 2017, 17 (11)
  • [26] Technology Interventions to Manage Food Intake: Where Are We Now?
    Margaret Allman-Farinelli
    Luke Gemming
    Current Diabetes Reports, 2017, 17
  • [27] OCT technology development: Where are we now? A commercial perspective
    Holmes, Jon
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHOTONICS, 2009, 2 (6-7) : 347 - 352
  • [28] A decade of yeast surface display technology: Where are we now?
    Pepper, Lauren R.
    Cho, Yong Ku
    Boder, Eric T.
    Shusta, Eric V.
    COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY & HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING, 2008, 11 (02) : 127 - 134
  • [29] Transforming the Radiological Interpretation Process: TRIP™, Where are we Now?
    Honeyman-Buck, Janice
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2010: ADVANCED PACS-BASED IMAGING INFORMATICS AND THERAPEUTIC APPLICATIONS, 2010, 7628
  • [30] Analysis of process model reuse: Where are we now, where should we go from here?
    Koschmider, Agnes
    Fellmann, Michael
    Schoknecht, Andreas
    Oberweis, Andreas
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2014, 66 : 9 - 19