A phantom study of the geometric accuracy of computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging stereotactic localization with the Leksell stereotactic system

被引:86
|
作者
Yu, C
Apuzzo, MLJ
Zee, CS
Petrovich, Z
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Neurol Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[3] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
geometric accuracy; image distortion; radiosurgery; stereotactic localization;
D O I
10.1097/00006123-200105000-00025
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To assess the spatial accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomographic stereotactic localization with the Leksell stereotactic system. METHODS: The phantom was constructed in the shape of a box, 164 mm in each dimension, with three perpendicular arrays of solid acrylic rod, 5 mm in diameter and spaced 30 mm apart within the phantom. In this study, images from two different MRI scanners and a computed tomographic scanner were obtained using the same Leksell (Elekta Instruments, Stockholm, Sweden) head frame placement. The coordinates of the rod images in the three principal planes were measured by using a tool provided with Leksell GammaPlan software (Elekta Instruments, Norcross, CA) and were compared with the physical phantom measurements. RESULTS: The greatest distortion was found around the periphery, and the least distortion (<1.5 mm) was present in the middle and most other areas of the phantom. In the phantom study using computed tomography, the mean values of the maximum errors for the x, y, and z axes were 1.0 mm (range, 0.2-1.3 mm), 0.4 mm (range, 0.1-0.8 mm), and 3.8 mm (range, 1.9-5.1 mm), respectively. The mean values of the maximum errors when using the Philips MRI scanner (Philips Medical Systems, Shelton, CT) were 0.9 mm (range, 0.4-1.7 mm), 0.2 mm (range, 0.0-0.7 mm), and 1.9 mm (range, 1.3-2.3 mm), respectively. Using the Siemens MRI scanner (Siemens Medical Systems, New York, NY), these values were 0.4 mm (range, 0.0-0.7 mm), 0.6 mm (range, 0.0-1.0 mm), and 1.6 mm (range, 0.8-2.0 mm), respectively. The geometric accuracy of the MRI scans when using the Siemens scanner was greatly improved after the implementation of a new software patch provided by the manufacturer. The accuracy also varied with the direction of phase encoding. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of target localization for most intracranial lesions during stereotactic radiosurgery can be achieved within the size of a voxel, especially by using the Siemens MRI scanner at current specifications and with a new software patch. However, caution is warranted when imaging peripheral lesions, where the distortion is greatest.
引用
收藏
页码:1092 / 1098
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Geometric accuracy of 3D coordinates of the Leksell stereotactic skull frame in 1.5 Tesla- and 3.0 Tesla-magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison of three different fixation screw materials
    Nakazawa, Hisato
    Mori, Yoshimasa
    Yamamuro, Osamu
    Komori, Masataka
    Shibamoto, Yuta
    Uchiyama, Yukio
    Tsugawa, Takahiko
    Hagiwara, Masahiro
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2014, 55 (06) : 1184 - 1191
  • [42] Does new magnetic resonance imaging technology provide better geometrical accuracy during stereotactic imaging?
    Novotny, J
    Vymazal, J
    Novotny, J
    Tlachacova, D
    Schmitt, M
    Chuda, P
    Urgosik, D
    Liscak, R
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2005, 102 : 8 - 13
  • [43] Accuracy evaluation of real-time body surface imaging guided system in spinal stereotactic radiosurgery: a phantom study
    Park, Jeong-Mee
    Lee, Haenghwa
    Sohn, Moon-Jun
    Kim, Kwang Hyeon
    Koo, Hae-Won
    Yoon, Sang-Won
    Moon, Chi-Woong
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2022, 81 (01) : 68 - 75
  • [44] Accuracy evaluation of real-time body surface imaging guided system in spinal stereotactic radiosurgery: a phantom study
    Jeong-Mee Park
    Haenghwa Lee
    Moon-Jun Sohn
    Kwang Hyeon Kim
    Hae-Won Koo
    Sang-Won Yoon
    Chi-Woong Moon
    Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2022, 81 : 68 - 75
  • [45] Localization Accuracy of a Novel Prone Breast Stereotactic Immobilization and Localization System
    Mutaf, Y.
    Yu, C.
    Nichols, E.
    Yi, B.
    Prado, K.
    D'Souza, W.
    Regine, W.
    Feigenberg, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [46] Evaluation of the spatial accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-based stereotactic target localization for gamma knife radiosurgery of functional disorders
    Bednarz, G
    Downes, B
    Corn, BW
    Curran, WJ
    Goldman, HW
    NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 45 (05) : 1156 - 1161
  • [47] Study on MRI Image Distortions Caused by Leksell Gamma Knife Stereotactic Localization Box
    Li, W.
    Yee, S.
    Bassano, D.
    Liu, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [48] Stereotactic accuracy of a 3-tesla magnetic resonance unit
    Azmi, H
    Schulder, M
    STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2003, 80 (1-4) : 140 - 145
  • [49] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING STEREOTACTIC THALAMOTOMY - REPORT OF A CASE WITH COMPARISON TO COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
    LUNSFORD, LD
    NEUROSURGERY, 1988, 23 (03) : 363 - 367
  • [50] Increased Frameless Stereotactic Accuracy With High-Field Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging COMMENTS
    Starreveld, Yves
    Dammers, Ruben
    Bakay, Roy A. E.
    Vannemreddy, Prasad
    Dorward, Ian G.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2012, 71 : 327 - 328