A phantom study of the geometric accuracy of computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging stereotactic localization with the Leksell stereotactic system

被引:86
|
作者
Yu, C
Apuzzo, MLJ
Zee, CS
Petrovich, Z
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Neurol Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[3] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
geometric accuracy; image distortion; radiosurgery; stereotactic localization;
D O I
10.1097/00006123-200105000-00025
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To assess the spatial accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomographic stereotactic localization with the Leksell stereotactic system. METHODS: The phantom was constructed in the shape of a box, 164 mm in each dimension, with three perpendicular arrays of solid acrylic rod, 5 mm in diameter and spaced 30 mm apart within the phantom. In this study, images from two different MRI scanners and a computed tomographic scanner were obtained using the same Leksell (Elekta Instruments, Stockholm, Sweden) head frame placement. The coordinates of the rod images in the three principal planes were measured by using a tool provided with Leksell GammaPlan software (Elekta Instruments, Norcross, CA) and were compared with the physical phantom measurements. RESULTS: The greatest distortion was found around the periphery, and the least distortion (<1.5 mm) was present in the middle and most other areas of the phantom. In the phantom study using computed tomography, the mean values of the maximum errors for the x, y, and z axes were 1.0 mm (range, 0.2-1.3 mm), 0.4 mm (range, 0.1-0.8 mm), and 3.8 mm (range, 1.9-5.1 mm), respectively. The mean values of the maximum errors when using the Philips MRI scanner (Philips Medical Systems, Shelton, CT) were 0.9 mm (range, 0.4-1.7 mm), 0.2 mm (range, 0.0-0.7 mm), and 1.9 mm (range, 1.3-2.3 mm), respectively. Using the Siemens MRI scanner (Siemens Medical Systems, New York, NY), these values were 0.4 mm (range, 0.0-0.7 mm), 0.6 mm (range, 0.0-1.0 mm), and 1.6 mm (range, 0.8-2.0 mm), respectively. The geometric accuracy of the MRI scans when using the Siemens scanner was greatly improved after the implementation of a new software patch provided by the manufacturer. The accuracy also varied with the direction of phase encoding. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of target localization for most intracranial lesions during stereotactic radiosurgery can be achieved within the size of a voxel, especially by using the Siemens MRI scanner at current specifications and with a new software patch. However, caution is warranted when imaging peripheral lesions, where the distortion is greatest.
引用
收藏
页码:1092 / 1098
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Accuracy of Frame-Based Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance Imaging vs Frame-Based Stereotactic Head Computed Tomography Fused With Recent Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Postimplantation Deep Brain Stimulator Lead Localization
    Pezeshkian, Patrick
    DeSalles, Antonio A. F.
    Gorgulho, Alessandra
    Behnke, Eric
    McArthur, David
    Bari, Ausaf
    NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 69 (06) : 1299 - 1306
  • [22] Influence of different inhomogeneities on the geometric distortion in stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging
    Novotny, J
    Vymazal, J
    Chuda, P
    Urgosik, D
    Novotny, J
    Liscak, R
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 76 : S213 - S213
  • [23] Stereotactic localization with magnetic resonance imaging: A phantom study to compare the accuracy obtained using two-dimensional and three-dimensional data acquisitions - Comment
    Maciunas, RJ
    Fitzpatrick, JM
    NEUROSURGERY, 1997, 41 (01) : 137 - 138
  • [24] Assessment of the accuracy of volume determination using stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging
    Novotny, J
    Novotny, J
    Vymazal, J
    Liscák, R
    Vladyka, V
    Simonová, G
    Urgosik, D
    Chytka, T
    RADIOSURGERY 1999, 2000, 3 : 107 - 116
  • [25] Phantom Study of a Novel Stereotactic Prostate Biopsy System Integrating Preinterventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Live Ultrasonography Fusion
    Kuru, Timur H.
    Roethke, Matthias
    Popeneciu, Valentin
    Teber, Dogu
    Pahernik, Sascha
    Zogal, Pawel
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (07) : 807 - 813
  • [26] IMAGE-GUIDED LOCALIZATION ACCURACY OF STEREOSCOPIC PLANAR AND VOLUMETRIC IMAGING METHODS FOR STEREOTACTIC RADIATION SURGERY AND STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIATION THERAPY: A PHANTOM STUDY
    Kim, Jinkoo
    Jin, Jian-Yue
    Walls, Nicole
    Nurushev, Teamour
    Movsas, Benjamin
    Chetty, Indrin J.
    Ryu, Samuel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 79 (05): : 1588 - 1596
  • [27] Phantom Tests with a Stereotactic Gamma-Localization System
    Welch, Benjamin
    Suarez, Susy
    Harding, Keith
    2008 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (2008 NSS/MIC), VOLS 1-9, 2009, : 5394 - 5398
  • [28] The Impact of System-Related Magnetic Resonance Imaging Geometric Distortion in Stereotactic Radiotherapy: A Case Report
    Kumagai, Motoki
    Kawamura, Mariko
    Kato, Yutaka
    Okudaira, Kuniyasu
    Naganawa, Shinji
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [29] Deep brain stimulation: stereotactic target localization using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Urgosik, D
    Vymazal, J
    Ruzicka, E
    Novotny, J
    Jech, R
    Liscak, R
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2002, 17 : S192 - S192
  • [30] An accurate adjustable applicator for magnetic resonance imaging-based stereotactic procedure using the Leksell G frame
    Kamiryo, T
    Laws, ER
    NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 45 (02) : 397 - 399