How usual is usual care in pragmatic intervention studies in primary care? An overview of recent trials

被引:70
|
作者
Smelt, Antonia F. H. [1 ]
van der Weele, Gerda M. [1 ]
Blom, Jeanet W. [1 ]
Gussekloo, Jacobijn [1 ]
Assendelft, Willem J. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE | 2010年 / 60卷 / 576期
关键词
control groups; family practice; pragmatic trials; primary care; usual care; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; RESPIRATORY-TRACT INFECTIONS; PRIMARY-HEALTH-CARE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; GENERAL-PRACTICE; CLINICAL-TRIAL; CONSORT STATEMENT; HEART-DISEASE; PEER SUPPORT; BACK-PAIN;
D O I
10.3399/bjgp10X514819
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Because pragmatic trials are performed to determine if an intervention can improve current practice, they often have a control group receiving 'usual care'. The behaviour of caregivers and patients in this control group should be influenced by the actions of researchers as little as possible. Guidelines for describing the composition and management of a usual care control group are lacking. Aim To explore the variety of approaches to the usual care concept in pragmatic trials; and evaluate the influence of the study design on the behaviour of caregivers and patients in a usual care control group. Design of study Review of 73 pragmatic trials in primary care with a usual care control group published between January 2005 and December 2009 in the British Medical Journal, the British Journal of General Practice, and Family Practice. Outcome measures were: description of the factors influencing caregiver and patients in a usual care control group related to an individual randomised design versus cluster randomisation. Results In total, 38 individually randomised trials and 35 cluster randomised trials were included. In most trials, caregivers had the freedom to treat control patients according to their own insight; in two studies, treatment options were restricted. Although possible influences on the behaviour of control caregivers and control patients were more often identified in individually randomised trials, these influences were also present in cluster randomised trials. The description of instructions and information provided to the control group was often insufficient, which made evaluation of the trials difficult. Conclusion Researchers in primary care medicine should carefully consider the design of a usual care control group, especially with regard to minimising the risk of study-induced behavioural change. It is recommended that an adequate description of the information is provided to control caregivers and control patients. A proposal is made for an extension to the CONSORT statement that requires authors to specify details of the usual care control group.
引用
收藏
页码:e305 / e318
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost-effectiveness of a motivational interviewing obesity intervention versus usual care in pediatric primary care offices
    Woolford, Susan J.
    Resnicow, Kenneth
    Davis, Matthew M.
    Nichols, Lauren P.
    Wasserman, Richard C.
    Harris, Donna
    Gebremariam, Achamyeleh
    Shone, Laura
    Fiks, Alexander G.
    Chang, Tammy
    OBESITY, 2022, 30 (11) : 2265 - 2274
  • [32] The effects of usual Care in Psychosocial Intervention Trials of patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review
    Deter, Hans-Christian
    Orth-Gomer, Kristina
    BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL MEDICINE, 2020, 14 (01)
  • [33] Processes and outcomes of 'usual' primary care for anxiety disorders
    Drayer, R. A.
    Belnap, B. Herbeck
    Zhu, F.
    Reynolds, C. F.
    Shear, K.
    Rollman, B. L.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 21 : 110 - 111
  • [34] The effects of usual Care in Psychosocial Intervention Trials of patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review
    Hans-Christian Deter
    Kristina Orth-Gomér
    BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 14
  • [35] Deprescribing Education vs Usual Care for Patients With Cognitive Impairment and Primary Care Clinicians The OPTIMIZE Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial
    Bayliss, Elizabeth A.
    Shetterly, Susan M.
    Drace, Melanie L.
    Norton, Jonathan D.
    Maiyani, Mahesh
    Gleason, Kathy S.
    Sawyer, Jennifer K.
    Weffald, Linda A.
    Green, Ariel R.
    Reeve, Emily
    Maciejewski, Matthew L.
    Sheehan, Orla C.
    Wolff, Jennifer L.
    Kraus, Courtney
    Boyd, Cynthia M.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 182 (05) : 534 - 542
  • [36] Usual care in back pain trials Author's response
    Somerville, Simon
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2009, 59 (560): : 210 - 211
  • [37] The effectiveness of an experimental treatment when compared to care as usual depends on the type of care as usual
    van de Wiel, Nicolle. M. H.
    Matthys, Walter
    Cohen-Kettenis, Peggy T.
    Maassen, Gerard H.
    Lochman, John E.
    van Engeland, Herman
    BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION, 2007, 31 (03) : 298 - 312
  • [38] Digital Mental Health Intervention Plus Usual Care Compared With Usual Care Only and Usual Care Plus In-Person Psychological Counseling for Orthopedic Patients With Symptoms of Depression or Anxiety: Cohort Study
    Leo, Ashwin J.
    Schuelke, Matthew J.
    Hunt, Devyani M.
    Miller, J. Philip
    Arean, Patricia A.
    Cheng, Abby L.
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (05)
  • [39] Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 5. Usual care and real life comparators
    Zuidgeest, Mira G. P.
    Welsing, Paco M. J.
    van Thiel, Ghislaine J. M. W.
    Ciaglia, Antonio
    Alfonso-Cristancho, Rafael
    Eckert, Laurent
    Eijkemans, Marinus J. C.
    Egger, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 90 : 92 - 98
  • [40] Telehealth Medication Abortion in Primary Care: A Comparison to Usual in-Clinic Care
    Srinivasulu, Silpa
    Nyandak, Deyang
    Fiastro, Anna E.
    MacNaughton, Honor
    Tressan, Amy
    Godfrey, Emily M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2024, 37 (02) : 295 - 302