How usual is usual care in pragmatic intervention studies in primary care? An overview of recent trials

被引:70
|
作者
Smelt, Antonia F. H. [1 ]
van der Weele, Gerda M. [1 ]
Blom, Jeanet W. [1 ]
Gussekloo, Jacobijn [1 ]
Assendelft, Willem J. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE | 2010年 / 60卷 / 576期
关键词
control groups; family practice; pragmatic trials; primary care; usual care; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; RESPIRATORY-TRACT INFECTIONS; PRIMARY-HEALTH-CARE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; GENERAL-PRACTICE; CLINICAL-TRIAL; CONSORT STATEMENT; HEART-DISEASE; PEER SUPPORT; BACK-PAIN;
D O I
10.3399/bjgp10X514819
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Because pragmatic trials are performed to determine if an intervention can improve current practice, they often have a control group receiving 'usual care'. The behaviour of caregivers and patients in this control group should be influenced by the actions of researchers as little as possible. Guidelines for describing the composition and management of a usual care control group are lacking. Aim To explore the variety of approaches to the usual care concept in pragmatic trials; and evaluate the influence of the study design on the behaviour of caregivers and patients in a usual care control group. Design of study Review of 73 pragmatic trials in primary care with a usual care control group published between January 2005 and December 2009 in the British Medical Journal, the British Journal of General Practice, and Family Practice. Outcome measures were: description of the factors influencing caregiver and patients in a usual care control group related to an individual randomised design versus cluster randomisation. Results In total, 38 individually randomised trials and 35 cluster randomised trials were included. In most trials, caregivers had the freedom to treat control patients according to their own insight; in two studies, treatment options were restricted. Although possible influences on the behaviour of control caregivers and control patients were more often identified in individually randomised trials, these influences were also present in cluster randomised trials. The description of instructions and information provided to the control group was often insufficient, which made evaluation of the trials difficult. Conclusion Researchers in primary care medicine should carefully consider the design of a usual care control group, especially with regard to minimising the risk of study-induced behavioural change. It is recommended that an adequate description of the information is provided to control caregivers and control patients. A proposal is made for an extension to the CONSORT statement that requires authors to specify details of the usual care control group.
引用
收藏
页码:e305 / e318
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The New Usual Care
    Radbel, Jared
    Boutsikaris, Daniel
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017, 35 (01) : 11 - 23
  • [22] Pragmatic trials in primary health care: what, when and how?
    Eldridge, Sandra
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2010, 27 (06) : 591 - 592
  • [23] Defining usual care comparators when designing pragmatic trials of complex health interventions: a methodology review
    Katrina M. Turner
    Alyson Huntley
    Tom Yardley
    Sarah Dawson
    Shoba Dawson
    Trials, 25
  • [24] The problem with usual care
    Mant, David
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2008, 58 (556): : 755 - 756
  • [25] What Is Usual Care?
    Olson, DaiWai M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE NURSING, 2019, 51 (02) : 61 - 61
  • [26] Defining usual care comparators when designing pragmatic trials of complex health interventions: a methodology review
    Turner, Katrina M.
    Huntley, Alyson
    Yardley, Tom
    Dawson, Sarah
    Dawson, Shoba
    TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [27] Comorbid panic disorder in usual care treatment of depression in primary care
    Shear, MK
    Schulberg, HC
    Brown, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN MEDICINE, 1996, 26 (04): : 380 - 381
  • [28] COST-UTILITY OF A MULTICOMPONENT INTERVENTION FOR FIBROMYALGIA VERSUS USUAL CARE: A PRAGMATIC RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Arfuch, Victoria Mailen
    Martin, Carina Aguilar
    Berenguera, Anna
    Angelats, Rosa Caballol
    Goncalves, Alessandra Queiroga
    Carrasco-Querol, Noelia
    Serra, Gemma Gonzalez
    Sol, Maria Cinta Sancho
    Anguera, Immaculada Fuste
    Friberg, Emilie
    Pettersson, Emma
    Casajuana, Marc
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2023, 55
  • [29] Relationship Between Primary Care Physician Capacity and Usual Source of Care
    Topmiller, Michael
    Shadowen, Hannah
    Byun, Hoon
    Carrozza, Mark
    Park, Jeongyoung
    Jabbarpour, Yalda
    Huffstetler, Alison
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2024, 37 (03) : 436 - 443
  • [30] ARTIST (osteoarthritis intervention standardized) study of standardised consultation versus usual care for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee in primary care in France: pragmatic randomised controlled trial
    Ravaud, P.
    Flipo, R-M
    Boutron, I.
    Roy, C.
    Mahmoudi, A.
    Giraudeau, B.
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338