How usual is usual care in pragmatic intervention studies in primary care? An overview of recent trials

被引:70
|
作者
Smelt, Antonia F. H. [1 ]
van der Weele, Gerda M. [1 ]
Blom, Jeanet W. [1 ]
Gussekloo, Jacobijn [1 ]
Assendelft, Willem J. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE | 2010年 / 60卷 / 576期
关键词
control groups; family practice; pragmatic trials; primary care; usual care; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; RESPIRATORY-TRACT INFECTIONS; PRIMARY-HEALTH-CARE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; GENERAL-PRACTICE; CLINICAL-TRIAL; CONSORT STATEMENT; HEART-DISEASE; PEER SUPPORT; BACK-PAIN;
D O I
10.3399/bjgp10X514819
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Because pragmatic trials are performed to determine if an intervention can improve current practice, they often have a control group receiving 'usual care'. The behaviour of caregivers and patients in this control group should be influenced by the actions of researchers as little as possible. Guidelines for describing the composition and management of a usual care control group are lacking. Aim To explore the variety of approaches to the usual care concept in pragmatic trials; and evaluate the influence of the study design on the behaviour of caregivers and patients in a usual care control group. Design of study Review of 73 pragmatic trials in primary care with a usual care control group published between January 2005 and December 2009 in the British Medical Journal, the British Journal of General Practice, and Family Practice. Outcome measures were: description of the factors influencing caregiver and patients in a usual care control group related to an individual randomised design versus cluster randomisation. Results In total, 38 individually randomised trials and 35 cluster randomised trials were included. In most trials, caregivers had the freedom to treat control patients according to their own insight; in two studies, treatment options were restricted. Although possible influences on the behaviour of control caregivers and control patients were more often identified in individually randomised trials, these influences were also present in cluster randomised trials. The description of instructions and information provided to the control group was often insufficient, which made evaluation of the trials difficult. Conclusion Researchers in primary care medicine should carefully consider the design of a usual care control group, especially with regard to minimising the risk of study-induced behavioural change. It is recommended that an adequate description of the information is provided to control caregivers and control patients. A proposal is made for an extension to the CONSORT statement that requires authors to specify details of the usual care control group.
引用
收藏
页码:e305 / e318
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trials and the importance of usual care
    White, Kyle C.
    Laupland, Kevin B.
    Bellomo, Rinaldo
    CRITICAL CARE, 2024, 28 (01)
  • [2] Effect modification by setting: how usual is usual care?
    Knottnerus, J. Andre
    Tugwell, Peter
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 65 (08) : 815 - 816
  • [3] The design of pragmatic trials with a "usual care" control group: results of a systematic review
    Smelt, A.
    van der Weele, G.
    Blom, J.
    Gussekloo, J.
    Assendelft, P.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2009, 139 (33-34) : 132S - 132S
  • [4] Assessing Usual Care in Clinical Trials
    Erlen, Judith A.
    Tamres, Lisa K.
    Reynolds, Nancy
    Golin, Carol E.
    Rosen, Marc I.
    Remien, Robert H.
    Banderas, Julie W.
    Schneiderman, Neil
    Wagner, Glenn
    Bangsberg, David R.
    Liu, Honghu
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2015, 37 (03) : 288 - 298
  • [5] Defining Usual Care in Clinical Trials
    Young, Heather M.
    Miyamoto, Sheridan
    Tang-Feldman, Yajarayma
    Dharmar, Madan
    Balsbaugh, Tom
    Greenwood, Deborah
    RESEARCH IN GERONTOLOGICAL NURSING, 2020, 13 (03) : 125 - 129
  • [6] Usual care in back pain trials
    Froud, Robert
    Underwood, Martin
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2009, 59 (560): : 209 - 210
  • [7] Critical care rehabilitation trials: the importance of 'usual care'
    Parker, Ann
    Tehranchi, Kian M.
    Needham, Dale M.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2013, 17 (05):
  • [8] Critical care rehabilitation trials: the importance of ‘usual care’
    Ann Parker
    Kian M Tehranchi
    Dale M Needham
    Critical Care, 17
  • [9] Oseltamivir plus usual care versus usual care for influenza-like illness in primary care: an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial
    Butler, Christopher C.
    van der Velden, Alike W.
    Bongard, Emily
    Saville, Benjamin R.
    Holmes, Jane
    Coenen, Samuel
    Cook, Johanna
    Francis, Nick A.
    Lewis, Roger J.
    Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek
    Llor, Carl
    Chlabicz, Slawomir
    Lionis, Christos
    Seifert, Bohumil
    Sundvall, Par-Daniel
    Colliers, Annelies
    Aabenhus, Rune
    Bjerrum, Lars
    Harbin, Nicolay Jonassen
    Lindbaek, Morten
    Glinz, Dominik
    Bucher, Heiner C.
    Kovacs, Bernadett
    Jurgute, Ruta Radzeviciene
    Lundgren, Pia Touboul
    Little, Paul
    Murphy, Andrew W.
    De Sutter, An
    Openshaw, Peter
    de Jong, Menno D.
    Connor, Jason T.
    Matheeussen, Veerle
    Ieven, Margareta
    Goossens, Herman
    Verheij, Theo J.
    LANCET, 2020, 395 (10217): : 42 - 52
  • [10] The 'usual care' of major depression in primary care practice
    Schulberg, HC
    Block, MR
    Madonia, MJ
    Scott, CP
    Lave, JR
    Rodriguez, E
    Coulehan, JL
    ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 1997, 6 (04) : 334 - 339