The Therapeutic Use of Impella Device in Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review

被引:3
|
作者
Tello, Carlos Munoz [1 ,2 ]
Jamil, Dawood [3 ]
Tran, Hadrian Hoang-Vu [2 ]
Mansoor, Mafaz [4 ]
Butt, Samia Rauf [4 ]
Satnarine, Travis [5 ]
Ratna, Pranuthi [6 ]
Sarker, Aditi [4 ]
Ramesh, Adarsh Srinivas [2 ]
Mohammed, Lubna [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catolica Cuenca, Gen Med, Cuenca, Ecuador
[2] Calif Inst Behav Neurosci & Psychol, Internal Med, Fairfield, CA 94534 USA
[3] Calif Inst Behav Neurosci & Psychol, Med, Fairfield, CA USA
[4] Calif Inst Behav Neurosci & Psychol, Gen Practice, Fairfield, CA USA
[5] Jackson Mem Hosp, Pediat, Miami, FL USA
[6] Kamineni Acad Med Sci & Res Ctr KAMSRC, Med, Hyderabad, India
关键词
cardiovascular intervention; heart assist devices; heart failure; impella device; cardiogenic shock; MANAGEMENT; PATIENT; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.30045
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) devices nowadays have been linked to cardiogenic shock (CS) due to the importance of their use as therapeutic instruments. This study aims to review pathophysiologic mechanisms of cardiogenic shock and the implementation of Impella to overcome this condition. To investigate several different types of studies and analyze the use of Impella device in cardiogenic shock and the outcomes of heart malfunctioning and determine its positive and negative impacts as a therapeutic tool in cardiac ischemia and use as a resource in critical patients, we conducted a systematic review through different databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist and used the Medical Subjects Heading (MeSH) search strategy to obtain significant articles. We found 883 papers in total, and after removing duplicates, applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, and finding the most significant information, we ended up with 30 articles that were reviewed containing information about the impact of Impella device in cardiogenic shock in different locations. The study strongly concludes that Impella device in the setting of cardiogenic shock has more advantages than disadvantages in terms of outcomes and complications as a non-pharmacologic tool. Improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction and signs and symptoms of cardiogenic shock criteria were determinants. Nevertheless, complications during the implementation and use of the device were established; in this manner, the evaluation and treatment of each patient separately are imperative. Consequently, more studies on this relevant topic are needed.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] A profile of the impella 5.5 for the clinical management of cardiogenic shock and a review of the current indications for use and future directions
    Hershenhouse, Korri S.
    Ferrell, Brandon E.
    Glezer, Ethan
    Wu, Jinling
    Goldstein, Daniel
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2024, 21 (12) : 1087 - 1099
  • [43] Use of the IMPELLA mechanical support device in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock - Results of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial
    Zeymer, U.
    Desch, S.
    Akin, I.
    Ouarrak, T.
    De Waha-Thiele, S.
    Montalescot, G.
    Piek, J. J.
    Zahn, R.
    Thiele, H.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 40 : 3605 - 3605
  • [44] Clinical indications and outcomes of Impella devices for severe cardiogenic shock in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review
    Srichawla, Bahadar S.
    Kipkorir, Vincent
    Sekhon, Manraj
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2023, 85 (12): : 6115 - 6122
  • [45] Impact of Pulmonary Artery Catheter Use in Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review
    Doshi, Harsh
    Shah, Mahek
    Vishnevsky, Alec
    Garg, Jalaj
    Alvarez, Rene
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 144
  • [46] Vasopressors and Inotropes as Predictors of Mortality in Acute Severe Cardiogenic Shock Treated With the Impella Device
    Rohm, Charlene L.
    Gadidov, Bogdan
    Ray, Herman E.
    Mannino, Salvatore F.
    Prasad, Rajnish
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2021, 31 : 71 - 75
  • [47] Cardiac Hemodynamic Parameters & Survival Outcomes of Impella in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kansara, Tikal
    Azhar, Abdullah Zoheb
    Shah, Palak
    Doshi, Rajkumar P.
    Majmundar, Monil
    CIRCULATION, 2019, 140
  • [48] Percutaneous Left Ventricular Support With the Impella 2.5 Assist Device in Severe Cardiogenic Shock
    Freeari, Markus
    Engstroem, Annemarie E.
    Jung, Christian
    Empen, Klaus
    Erne, Paul
    Cook, Stephane
    Windecker, Stephan
    Bergmann, Martin W.
    Klingenberg, Roland
    Luescher, Thomas F.
    Haude, Michael
    Rukands, Dierk
    Butter, Christian
    Ullman, Bengt
    Hellgren, Laila
    Modena, Maria Grazia
    Pedrazzini, Giovanni
    Henriques, Jose P.
    Figulla, Hans R.
    Lauten, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 58 (20) : B133 - B133
  • [49] Impella Device Success: Walking Home After Cardiogenic Shock From Ventricular Fibrillation
    Smith, Christopher
    Menon, Vivek
    Smith, Dantwan
    CIRCULATION, 2020, 142
  • [50] Outcomes of Impella vs Left Ventricular Assist Device in Cardiogenic Shock Caused by MI
    Gabriel, Nielsen
    Dasu, Kirti
    Khalid, Yaser
    Dasu, Neethi
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2023, 237 (05) : S69 - S69