The Therapeutic Use of Impella Device in Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review

被引:3
|
作者
Tello, Carlos Munoz [1 ,2 ]
Jamil, Dawood [3 ]
Tran, Hadrian Hoang-Vu [2 ]
Mansoor, Mafaz [4 ]
Butt, Samia Rauf [4 ]
Satnarine, Travis [5 ]
Ratna, Pranuthi [6 ]
Sarker, Aditi [4 ]
Ramesh, Adarsh Srinivas [2 ]
Mohammed, Lubna [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catolica Cuenca, Gen Med, Cuenca, Ecuador
[2] Calif Inst Behav Neurosci & Psychol, Internal Med, Fairfield, CA 94534 USA
[3] Calif Inst Behav Neurosci & Psychol, Med, Fairfield, CA USA
[4] Calif Inst Behav Neurosci & Psychol, Gen Practice, Fairfield, CA USA
[5] Jackson Mem Hosp, Pediat, Miami, FL USA
[6] Kamineni Acad Med Sci & Res Ctr KAMSRC, Med, Hyderabad, India
关键词
cardiovascular intervention; heart assist devices; heart failure; impella device; cardiogenic shock; MANAGEMENT; PATIENT; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.30045
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) devices nowadays have been linked to cardiogenic shock (CS) due to the importance of their use as therapeutic instruments. This study aims to review pathophysiologic mechanisms of cardiogenic shock and the implementation of Impella to overcome this condition. To investigate several different types of studies and analyze the use of Impella device in cardiogenic shock and the outcomes of heart malfunctioning and determine its positive and negative impacts as a therapeutic tool in cardiac ischemia and use as a resource in critical patients, we conducted a systematic review through different databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist and used the Medical Subjects Heading (MeSH) search strategy to obtain significant articles. We found 883 papers in total, and after removing duplicates, applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, and finding the most significant information, we ended up with 30 articles that were reviewed containing information about the impact of Impella device in cardiogenic shock in different locations. The study strongly concludes that Impella device in the setting of cardiogenic shock has more advantages than disadvantages in terms of outcomes and complications as a non-pharmacologic tool. Improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction and signs and symptoms of cardiogenic shock criteria were determinants. Nevertheless, complications during the implementation and use of the device were established; in this manner, the evaluation and treatment of each patient separately are imperative. Consequently, more studies on this relevant topic are needed.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impella in cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kris G. Vargas
    Bernhard Jäger
    Christoph C. Kaufmann
    Andrea Biagioli
    Stephan Watremez
    Fernando Gatto
    Cem Özbek
    Amjad Razouk
    Alexander Geppert
    Kurt Huber
    Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2020, 132 : 716 - 725
  • [22] Impella in cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vargas, Kris G.
    Jaeger, Bernhard
    Kaufmann, Christoph C.
    Biagioli, Andrea
    Watremez, Stephan
    Gatto, Fernando
    Oezbek, Cem
    Razouk, Amjad
    Geppert, Alexander
    Huber, Kurt
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2020, 132 (23-24) : 716 - 725
  • [23] IMPELLA VERSUS EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION IN CARDIOGENIC SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Abusnina, Waiel
    Ismayl, Mahmoud
    Al-abdouh, Ahmad
    Ganesan, Vaishnavi
    Mostafa, Mostafa Reda
    Hallak, Osama
    Peterson, Emily
    Abdou, Mahmoud
    Goldsweig, Andrew M.
    Aboeata, Ahmed
    Dahal, Khagendra
    SHOCK, 2022, 58 (05): : 349 - 357
  • [24] Axillary or Subclavian Impella 5.0 Support in Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Schultz, Jessica
    Duval, Sue
    Shaffer, Andrew
    John, Ranjit
    Alexy, Tamas
    Martin, Cindy M.
    Cogswell, Rebecca
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2022, 68 (02) : 233 - 238
  • [25] Impella in Cardiogenic Shock: Who and When?
    Vela, Maria Monteagudo
    Panoulas, Vasileios
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (05) : 697 - 697
  • [26] Outcome of the Impella Device for Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients With Refractory Cardiogenic Shock
    Farahmand, P.
    Quessard, A.
    Lebreton, G.
    d'Alessandro, C.
    Mastroianni, C.
    Leprince, P.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 34 (04): : S84 - S84
  • [27] Predictors of Mortality and Outcomes of Acute Severe Cardiogenic Shock Treated with the Impella Device
    Rohm, Charlene L.
    Gadidov, Bogdan
    Leitson, Michael
    Ray, Herman E.
    Prasad, Rajnish
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 124 (04): : 499 - 504
  • [28] Impella Versus Extracorporeal Membranous Oxygenation (ECMO) for Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ahmad, Soban
    Ahsan, Muhammad Junaid
    Ikram, Sundus
    Lateef, Noman
    Khan, Behram A.
    Tabassum, Shehroze
    Naeem, Aroma
    Qavi, Ahmed H.
    Ardhanari, Sivakumar
    Goldsweig, Andrew M.
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (01)
  • [29] Mono-center experience in safety and efficacy of the Impella device in cardiogenic shock
    Richter, A.
    Traser, J.
    Karatolios, K.
    Luesebrink, U.
    Schoppet, M.
    Schieffer, B.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 : 353 - 353
  • [30] Early experience with percutaneous ventricular assist device Impella CP in cardiogenic shock
    Restrepo Cordoba, M. A. Maria Alejandra
    Hernandez Perez, F. J.
    Segovia Cubero, J.
    Gomez Bueno, M.
    Oteo Dominguez, J. F.
    Goicolea Ruigomez, J.
    Alonso Pulpon, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2016, 18 : 450 - 450