Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies

被引:344
|
作者
Flahault, A [1 ]
Cadilhac, M
Thomas, G
机构
[1] Hop Tenon, Unite Biostat & Informat Med, F-75970 Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris 06, INSERM, Unite 707, F-75571 Paris, France
关键词
sensitivity; specificity; sample size; binomial distribution; diagnostic test;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.12.009
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives: Guidelines for conducting studies and reading medical literature on diagnostic tests have been published: Requirements for the selection of cases and controls, and for ensuring a correct reference standard are now clarified. Our objective was to provide tables for sample size determination in this context. Study Design and Setting: In the usual situation, where the prevalence Prev of the disease of interest is < 0.50, one first determines the minimal number N-cases of cases required to ensure a given precision of the sensitivity estimate. Computations are based on the binomial distribution, for user-specified type I and type II error levels. The minimal number N-controls, of controls is then derived so as to allow for representativeness of the study population, according to N-controls = N-cases [(1 - Prev)/Prev]. Results: Tables give the values of N-cases corresponding to expected sensitivities from 0.60 to 0.99, acceptable lower 95% confidence limits from 0.50 to 0.98, and 5% probability of the estimated lower confidence limit being lower than the acceptable level. Conclusion: When designing diagnostic test studies, sample size calculations should be performed in order to guarantee the design accuracy. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:859 / 862
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sample size for diagnostic accuracy and disease frequency - Author reply
    Knottnerus, JA
    Muris, JW
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 57 (08) : 871 - 872
  • [32] Systematic reviews of studies of diagnostic test accuracy
    Moreno G, Gladys
    Pantoja C, Tomas
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2009, 137 (02) : 303 - 307
  • [33] Research Note: Diagnostic test accuracy studies
    Verhagen, Arianne
    Hancock, Mark
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2021, 67 (01) : 69 - 71
  • [34] Sample sizes of studies on diagnostic accuracy: literature survey
    Bachmann, LM
    Puhan, MA
    ter Riet, G
    Bossuyt, PM
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7550): : 1127 - 1129
  • [35] Sample size calculation for the one-sample log-rank test
    Schmidt, Rene
    Kwiecien, Robert
    Faldum, Andreas
    Berthold, Frank
    Hero, Barbara
    Ligges, Sandra
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (06) : 1031 - 1040
  • [36] Sample size calculation for the one-sample log-rank test
    Wu, Jianrong
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2015, 14 (01) : 26 - 33
  • [37] On Power and Sample Size Calculation in Ethnic Sensitivity Studies
    Zhang, Wei
    Sethuraman, Venkat
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2011, 21 (01) : 18 - 23
  • [38] Sample Size Calculation in Double Consent Randomized Design
    Kung-Jong Lui
    Chii-Dean Lin
    Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 2004, 38 (2): : 149 - 156
  • [39] Sample size calculation in double consent randomized design
    Lui, KJ
    Lin, CD
    DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2004, 38 (02): : 149 - 156
  • [40] Sample size calculation for meta-epidemiological studies
    Giraudeau, Bruno
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Tavernier, Elsa
    Trinquart, Ludovic
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (02) : 239 - 250