Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies

被引:344
|
作者
Flahault, A [1 ]
Cadilhac, M
Thomas, G
机构
[1] Hop Tenon, Unite Biostat & Informat Med, F-75970 Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris 06, INSERM, Unite 707, F-75571 Paris, France
关键词
sensitivity; specificity; sample size; binomial distribution; diagnostic test;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.12.009
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives: Guidelines for conducting studies and reading medical literature on diagnostic tests have been published: Requirements for the selection of cases and controls, and for ensuring a correct reference standard are now clarified. Our objective was to provide tables for sample size determination in this context. Study Design and Setting: In the usual situation, where the prevalence Prev of the disease of interest is < 0.50, one first determines the minimal number N-cases of cases required to ensure a given precision of the sensitivity estimate. Computations are based on the binomial distribution, for user-specified type I and type II error levels. The minimal number N-controls, of controls is then derived so as to allow for representativeness of the study population, according to N-controls = N-cases [(1 - Prev)/Prev]. Results: Tables give the values of N-cases corresponding to expected sensitivities from 0.60 to 0.99, acceptable lower 95% confidence limits from 0.50 to 0.98, and 5% probability of the estimated lower confidence limit being lower than the acceptable level. Conclusion: When designing diagnostic test studies, sample size calculations should be performed in order to guarantee the design accuracy. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:859 / 862
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Introduction to diagnostic test accuracy studies
    Sitch, Alice J.
    Dekkers, Olaf M.
    Scholefield, Barnaby R.
    Takwoingi, Yemisi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 184 (02) : E5 - E9
  • [22] Interpreting diagnostic test accuracy studies
    Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
    SEMINARS IN HEMATOLOGY, 2008, 45 (03) : 189 - 195
  • [23] Approaches to sample size calculation in comparative studies
    Pandey R.M.
    The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 1999, 66 (4) : 533 - 538
  • [24] Sample size calculation in metabolic phenotyping studies
    Billoir, Elise
    Navratil, Vincent
    Blaise, Benjamin J.
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2015, 16 (05) : 813 - 819
  • [25] POWER AND SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION FOR MICROARRAY STUDIES
    Jung, Sin-Ho
    Young, S. Stanley
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2012, 22 (01) : 30 - 42
  • [26] Sample size calculation in forensic anthropological studies
    Ramsthaler, F.
    Burkholder, I.
    Kettner, M.
    Verhoff, M. A.
    RECHTSMEDIZIN, 2013, 23 (02) : 100 - 107
  • [27] LIKELIHOOD RATIOS WITH CONFIDENCE - SAMPLE-SIZE ESTIMATION FOR DIAGNOSTIC-TEST STUDIES
    SIMEL, DL
    SAMSA, GP
    MATCHAR, DB
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 44 (08) : 763 - 770
  • [28] Sample size re-estimation in paired comparative diagnostic accuracy studies with a binary response
    McCray, Gareth P. J.
    Titman, Andrew C.
    Ghaneh, Paula
    Lancaster, Gillian A.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [29] Sample size re-estimation in paired comparative diagnostic accuracy studies with a binary response
    Gareth P. J. McCray
    Andrew C. Titman
    Paula Ghaneh
    Gillian A. Lancaster
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17
  • [30] Statistical issues including design and sample size calculation in thorough QT/QTc studies
    Zhang, Joanne
    Machado, Stella G.
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2008, 18 (03) : 451 - 467