Measuring clinical trial transparency: an empirical analysis of newly approved drugs and large pharmaceutical companies

被引:42
|
作者
Miller, Jennifer E. [1 ,2 ]
Wilenzick, Marc [3 ]
Ritcey, Nolan [2 ]
Ross, Joseph S. [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Mello, Michelle M. [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Sch Med, Div Med Eth, Dept Populat Hlth, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Bioeth Int, New York, NY 10017 USA
[3] Int Aids Vaccine Initiat, New York, NY USA
[4] Yale Sch Med, Sect Gen Internal Med, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Yale Sch Med, Robert Wood Johnson Fdn Clin Scholars Program, Dept Med, New Haven, CT USA
[6] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, New Haven, CT USA
[7] Yale New Haven Hlth, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, New Haven, CT USA
[8] Stanford Univ, Stanford Law Sch, Stanford, CA USA
[9] Stanford Univ, Stanford Law Sch, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Stanford, CA USA
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 12期
关键词
bioethics; clinical pharmacology; clinical trial transparency; good pharma scorecard; health Policy; law (see medical law); medical ethics; pharma ethics; public health;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017917
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To define a series of clinical trial transparency measures and apply them to large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and their 2014 FDA-approved drugs. Design Cross-sectional descriptive analysis of all clinical trials supporting 2014 Food and Drugs Administration (FDA)-approved new drug applications (NDAs) for novel drugs sponsored by large companies. Data sources Data from over 45 sources, including Drugs@FDA.gov, ClinicalTrials. gov, corporate and international registries; PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, corporate press releases, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings and personal communications with drug manufacturers. Outcome measures Trial registration, results reporting, clinical study report (CSR) synopsis sharing, biomedical journal publication, and FDA Amendments Acts (FDAAA) compliance, analysed on the drug level. Results The FDA approved 19 novel new drugs, sponsored by 11 large companies, involving 553 trials, in 2014. We analysed 505 relevant trials. Per drug, a median of 100% (IQR 86%-100%) of trials in patients were registered, 71% (IQR 57%-100%) reported results or shared a CSR synopsis, 80% (70%-100%) were published and 96% (80%-100%) were publicly available in some form by 13 months after FDA approval. Disclosure rates were lower at FDA approval (65%) and improved significantly by 6 months post FDA approval. Per drug, a median of 100% (IQR 75%-100%) of FDAAA-applicable trials were compliant. Half of reviewed drugs had publicly disclosed results for all trials in patients in our sample. One trial was uniquely registered in a corporate registry, and not ClinicalTrials. gov; 0 trials were uniquely registered in international registries. Conclusions Among large pharmaceutical companies and new drugs, clinical trial transparency is high based on several standards, although opportunities for improvement remain. Transparency is markedly higher for trials in patients than among all trials supporting drug approval, including trials in healthy volunteers. Ongoing efforts to publicly track companies' transparency records and recognise exemplary companies may encourage further progress.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effects of environmental regulations on the productivity of large companies: An empirical analysis of the spanish case
    Ayerbe C.G.
    Górriz C.G.
    Journal of Management and Governance, 2001, 5 (2) : 129 - 152
  • [42] Stock Market Returns and Clinical Trial Results of Investigational Compounds: An Event Study Analysis of Large Biopharmaceutical Companies
    Hwang, Thomas J.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (08):
  • [43] Modulation of biopharmaceutical properties of drugs using sulfonate counterions: A critical analysis of FDA-approved pharmaceutical salts
    Bharate, Sonali S.
    JOURNAL OF DRUG DELIVERY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 66
  • [44] Analysis of the pharmaceutical coordination activity and the management of experimental drugs in clinical trials
    Perroux, C.
    Zaragoza, L.
    Bourgoin, H.
    Respaud, R.
    Pourrat, X.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2020, 42 (01) : 274 - 275
  • [45] Clinical pharmaceutical analysis of antihypertensive drugs in elderly patients with essential hypertension
    Chen, Jinwen
    Shen, Lijun
    Miao, Zhiru
    Fu, Liebo
    MINERVA SURGERY, 2023, 78 (01): : 92 - 93
  • [46] Review of clinical trial settings of drugs commonly used in primary care and approved between 2005 and 2012
    Jason R. Crossley
    Tina P. Tan
    Keisha Herbin Smith
    Joseph S. Ross
    Daniel J. Merenstein
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2018, 33 : 1431 - 1432
  • [47] Clinical trial registration, reporting, publication and FDAAA compliance: a cross-sectional analysis and ranking of new drugs approved by the FDA in 2012
    Miller, Jennifer E.
    Korn, David
    Ross, Joseph S.
    BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (11):
  • [48] Review of clinical trial settings of drugs commonly used in primary care and approved between 2005 and 2012
    Crossley, Jason R.
    Tan, Tina P.
    Smith, Keisha Herbin
    Ross, Joseph S.
    Merenstein, Daniel J.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 33 (09) : 1431 - +
  • [49] Approved indications for osteoporosis drugs in Japan-Review of applications using global clinical trial at PMDA
    Sano, Yukie
    Ono, Akiko
    Yanagi, Kenichi
    Ishida, Mari
    Hirano, Mai
    Shinohara, Kayo
    Makie, Toshio
    Asano, Junichi
    Kato, Naoto
    Hosoki, Rumiko
    Yamada, Masanobu
    Hirata, Masakazu
    ENDOCRINE JOURNAL, 2010, 57 : S489 - S489