Measuring clinical trial transparency: an empirical analysis of newly approved drugs and large pharmaceutical companies

被引:42
|
作者
Miller, Jennifer E. [1 ,2 ]
Wilenzick, Marc [3 ]
Ritcey, Nolan [2 ]
Ross, Joseph S. [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Mello, Michelle M. [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Sch Med, Div Med Eth, Dept Populat Hlth, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Bioeth Int, New York, NY 10017 USA
[3] Int Aids Vaccine Initiat, New York, NY USA
[4] Yale Sch Med, Sect Gen Internal Med, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Yale Sch Med, Robert Wood Johnson Fdn Clin Scholars Program, Dept Med, New Haven, CT USA
[6] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, New Haven, CT USA
[7] Yale New Haven Hlth, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, New Haven, CT USA
[8] Stanford Univ, Stanford Law Sch, Stanford, CA USA
[9] Stanford Univ, Stanford Law Sch, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Stanford, CA USA
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 12期
关键词
bioethics; clinical pharmacology; clinical trial transparency; good pharma scorecard; health Policy; law (see medical law); medical ethics; pharma ethics; public health;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017917
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To define a series of clinical trial transparency measures and apply them to large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and their 2014 FDA-approved drugs. Design Cross-sectional descriptive analysis of all clinical trials supporting 2014 Food and Drugs Administration (FDA)-approved new drug applications (NDAs) for novel drugs sponsored by large companies. Data sources Data from over 45 sources, including Drugs@FDA.gov, ClinicalTrials. gov, corporate and international registries; PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, corporate press releases, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings and personal communications with drug manufacturers. Outcome measures Trial registration, results reporting, clinical study report (CSR) synopsis sharing, biomedical journal publication, and FDA Amendments Acts (FDAAA) compliance, analysed on the drug level. Results The FDA approved 19 novel new drugs, sponsored by 11 large companies, involving 553 trials, in 2014. We analysed 505 relevant trials. Per drug, a median of 100% (IQR 86%-100%) of trials in patients were registered, 71% (IQR 57%-100%) reported results or shared a CSR synopsis, 80% (70%-100%) were published and 96% (80%-100%) were publicly available in some form by 13 months after FDA approval. Disclosure rates were lower at FDA approval (65%) and improved significantly by 6 months post FDA approval. Per drug, a median of 100% (IQR 75%-100%) of FDAAA-applicable trials were compliant. Half of reviewed drugs had publicly disclosed results for all trials in patients in our sample. One trial was uniquely registered in a corporate registry, and not ClinicalTrials. gov; 0 trials were uniquely registered in international registries. Conclusions Among large pharmaceutical companies and new drugs, clinical trial transparency is high based on several standards, although opportunities for improvement remain. Transparency is markedly higher for trials in patients than among all trials supporting drug approval, including trials in healthy volunteers. Ongoing efforts to publicly track companies' transparency records and recognise exemplary companies may encourage further progress.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Longitudinal trends and subgroup analysis in publication patterns for preclinical data of newly approved drugs
    Ursula Köster
    Ingo Nolte
    Martin C. Michel
    Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, 2016, 389 : 201 - 209
  • [22] Clinical trial allocation in multinational pharmaceutical companies - a qualitative study on influential factors
    Dombernowsky, Tilde
    Haedersdal, Merete
    Lassen, Ulrik
    Thomsen, Simon F.
    PHARMACOLOGY RESEARCH & PERSPECTIVES, 2017, 5 (03):
  • [23] Quality of clinical trial evidence on devices and drugs approved to treat coronary artery disease
    Stefanini, G. G.
    Naci, H.
    Cao, D.
    Malanchini, G.
    Sturla, M.
    Byrne, R.
    Baber, U.
    Reimers, B.
    Condorelli, G.
    Mossialos, E.
    Windecker, S.
    Mehran, R.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 40 : 3751 - 3751
  • [24] Timing of pivotal clinical trial results reporting for newly approved medications varied by reporting source
    Withycombe, Bethany
    Ovenell, Mac
    Meeker, Amanda
    Ahmed, Sharia M.
    Hartung, Daniel M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 77 : 78 - 83
  • [25] The Price We Pay for Progress: A Meta-Analysis of Harms of Newly Approved Anticancer Drugs
    Niraula, Saroj
    Seruga, Bostjan
    Ocana, Alberto
    Shao, Tiffany
    Goldstein, Robyn
    Tannock, Ian F.
    Amir, Eitan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (24) : 3012 - 3019
  • [26] Three Newly Approved Drugs for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Incorporating Ibrutinib, Idelalisib, and Obinutuzumab into Clinical Practice
    Sanford, David S.
    Wierda, William G.
    Burger, Jan A.
    Keating, Michael J.
    O'Brien, Susan M.
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2015, 15 (07): : 385 - 391
  • [27] Absolute risk and cost of management of toxicities of newly approved anticancer drugs: A meta-analysis.
    Niraula, Saroj
    Amir, Eitan
    Emilio, Francisco
    Badillo, Vera
    Seruga, Bostjan
    Ocana, Alberto
    Tannock, Ian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
  • [28] Dermatology clinical trials: Analysis of investments by the top 10 pharmaceutical companies
    Rick, Jonathan W.
    Nair, Nikhil
    De, Devea R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 87 (03) : AB39 - AB39
  • [29] Venture capital directors and corporate debt structure: An empirical analysis of newly listed companies
    Dang, Viet Anh
    Karpuz, Ahmet
    Mohamed, Abdul
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2023, 157
  • [30] Share transfer behaviour of newly introduced Tunisian companies and its determinants: An empirical analysis
    Gana, Marjene Rabah
    El Ammari, Anis
    JOURNAL OF MULTINATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 23 (04) : 285 - 300