Measuring clinical trial transparency: an empirical analysis of newly approved drugs and large pharmaceutical companies

被引:42
|
作者
Miller, Jennifer E. [1 ,2 ]
Wilenzick, Marc [3 ]
Ritcey, Nolan [2 ]
Ross, Joseph S. [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Mello, Michelle M. [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Sch Med, Div Med Eth, Dept Populat Hlth, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Bioeth Int, New York, NY 10017 USA
[3] Int Aids Vaccine Initiat, New York, NY USA
[4] Yale Sch Med, Sect Gen Internal Med, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Yale Sch Med, Robert Wood Johnson Fdn Clin Scholars Program, Dept Med, New Haven, CT USA
[6] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, New Haven, CT USA
[7] Yale New Haven Hlth, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, New Haven, CT USA
[8] Stanford Univ, Stanford Law Sch, Stanford, CA USA
[9] Stanford Univ, Stanford Law Sch, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Stanford, CA USA
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 12期
关键词
bioethics; clinical pharmacology; clinical trial transparency; good pharma scorecard; health Policy; law (see medical law); medical ethics; pharma ethics; public health;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017917
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To define a series of clinical trial transparency measures and apply them to large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and their 2014 FDA-approved drugs. Design Cross-sectional descriptive analysis of all clinical trials supporting 2014 Food and Drugs Administration (FDA)-approved new drug applications (NDAs) for novel drugs sponsored by large companies. Data sources Data from over 45 sources, including Drugs@FDA.gov, ClinicalTrials. gov, corporate and international registries; PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, corporate press releases, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings and personal communications with drug manufacturers. Outcome measures Trial registration, results reporting, clinical study report (CSR) synopsis sharing, biomedical journal publication, and FDA Amendments Acts (FDAAA) compliance, analysed on the drug level. Results The FDA approved 19 novel new drugs, sponsored by 11 large companies, involving 553 trials, in 2014. We analysed 505 relevant trials. Per drug, a median of 100% (IQR 86%-100%) of trials in patients were registered, 71% (IQR 57%-100%) reported results or shared a CSR synopsis, 80% (70%-100%) were published and 96% (80%-100%) were publicly available in some form by 13 months after FDA approval. Disclosure rates were lower at FDA approval (65%) and improved significantly by 6 months post FDA approval. Per drug, a median of 100% (IQR 75%-100%) of FDAAA-applicable trials were compliant. Half of reviewed drugs had publicly disclosed results for all trials in patients in our sample. One trial was uniquely registered in a corporate registry, and not ClinicalTrials. gov; 0 trials were uniquely registered in international registries. Conclusions Among large pharmaceutical companies and new drugs, clinical trial transparency is high based on several standards, although opportunities for improvement remain. Transparency is markedly higher for trials in patients than among all trials supporting drug approval, including trials in healthy volunteers. Ongoing efforts to publicly track companies' transparency records and recognise exemplary companies may encourage further progress.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measuring the efficiency of large pharmaceutical companies: an industry analysis
    Fernando Gascón
    Jesús Lozano
    Borja Ponte
    David de la Fuente
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2017, 18 : 587 - 608
  • [2] Measuring the efficiency of large pharmaceutical companies: an industry analysis
    Gascon, Fernando
    Lozano, Jesus
    Ponte, Borja
    de la Fuente, David
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2017, 18 (05): : 587 - 608
  • [3] Ranking pharmaceutical companies on clinical trial diversity
    Varma, Tanvee
    Miller, Jennifer E.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 380
  • [4] Newly approved cancer drugs in China - innovation and clinical benefit
    Zhang, Yichen
    Wagner, Anita K.
    Guan, Xiaodong
    NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 20 (03) : 135 - 136
  • [5] Newly approved cancer drugs in China — innovation and clinical benefit
    Yichen Zhang
    Anita K. Wagner
    Xiaodong Guan
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2023, 20 : 135 - 136
  • [6] Analysis of estimated clinical benefit of newly approved drugs for US patients with acute myeloid leukemia
    Tran, Audrey A.
    Miljkovic, Milos
    Prasad, Vinay
    LEUKEMIA RESEARCH, 2020, 96
  • [7] Pharmaceutical companies to develop database on clinical trial sites
    O'Hare, Alice
    BIOANALYSIS, 2013, 5 (02) : 129 - 129
  • [8] Radiotherapy and newly approved cancer drugs - A quantitative analysis of registered protocols for drugs approved for the treatment of solid tumors
    Rabe, Leonie
    Wenz, Frederik
    Ehmann, Michael
    Lohr, Frank
    Hofheinz, Ralf Dieter
    Buergy, Daniel
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 168 : 69 - 74
  • [9] Leading pharmaceutical companies lacked transparency on clinical trials' informed consent forms
    Dal-Re, Rafael
    Voo, Teck Chuan
    Holm, Soren
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 162 : 187 - 189
  • [10] The impact of newly approved drugs on clinical and operational strategies for multiple myeloma clinical trials.
    Krishnan, Bhavani
    Collins, Bernadette
    Cho, Michael Jeffrey
    Partridge, Tanya
    Vighnay, Durga
    Given, Marie
    Enschede, Sari Heitner
    Bochenska, Katarzyna
    Hodge, Jeff Paul
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (15)