Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process

被引:21
|
作者
Reicheneder, Claudia [1 ]
Hofrichter, Bernd [1 ]
Faltermeier, Andreas [1 ]
Proff, Peter [1 ]
Lippold, Carsten [2 ]
Kirschneck, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Regensburg, Dept Orthodont, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
[2] Univ Munster, Dept Orthodont, D-48149 Munster, Germany
来源
HEAD & FACE MEDICINE | 2014年 / 10卷
关键词
Retainer; Wire; Adhesive; Sandblasting; Shear bond strength; ORTHODONTIC RETAINERS; ENAMEL;
D O I
10.1186/1746-160X-10-51
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: We aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of three different retainer wires and three different bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process of enamel surface sandblasting. Methods: 400 extracted bovine incisors were divided into 10 groups of 20 paired specimens each. 10 specimens of each group were pretreated by enamel sandblasting. The retainer wires Bond-A-Braid (TM), GAC-Wildcat (R)-Twistflex and everStick (R) ORTHO were bonded to the teeth with the adhesives Transbond (TM)-LR, Tetric-EvoFlow (TM) and Stick (R) FLOW and then debonded measuring the SBS. Results: While sandblasting generally increased SBS for all tested combinations, the retainer wires bonded with Transbond (TM)-LR showed the highest SBS both with and without prior sandblasting. Significantly lower SBS were found for Tetric-EvoFlow (TM) that were comparable to those for everStick (R) ORTHO. Conclusions: Pretreatment of enamel surfaces by sandblasting increased the SBS of all retainer-wires. Transbond (TM)-LR showed the best results compared to Tetric-EvoFlow (TM) and everStick (R) ORTHO, while all combinations used provided sufficient bonding strengths for clinical use.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] In vitro peel/shear bond strength of orthodontic adhesives
    Willems, G
    Carels, CEL
    Verbeke, G
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1997, 25 (3-4) : 263 - 270
  • [32] EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENT ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF DENTIN ADHESIVES
    STANGEL, I
    OSTRO, E
    BENKO, J
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1986, 65 : 174 - 174
  • [33] Shear bond strength of "one bottle" dentin adhesives
    Al-Ehaideb, A
    Mohammed, H
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2000, 84 (04): : 408 - 412
  • [34] Shear bond strength of "one bottle" dentin adhesives
    Al Ehaideb, AA
    Al Tahawi, HM
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 (05) : 1278 - 1278
  • [35] Shear Bond Strength Evaluation of Resin Composite Bonded to GIC Using Different Adhesives
    Gupta, Ruchi
    Mahajan, Sonam
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2015, 9 (01) : ZC27 - ZC29
  • [36] Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives
    Scougall Vilchis, Rogelio Jose
    Yamamoto, Seigo
    Kitai, Noriyuki
    Yamamoto, Kohji
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 136 (03) : 425 - 430
  • [37] Shear bond strength of different adhesives to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin
    Celik, Esra Uzer
    Erguecue, Zeynep
    Tuerkuen, L. Sebnem
    Tuerkuen, Murat
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2006, 8 (05): : 319 - 325
  • [38] Orthodontic bonding to silicate ceramics: impact of different pretreatment methods on shear bond strength between ceramic restorations and ceramic brackets
    Rebecca Jungbauer
    Christian Kirschneck
    Christian M. Hammer
    Peter Proff
    Daniel Edelhoff
    Bogna Stawarczyk
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022, 26 : 2827 - 2837
  • [39] Orthodontic bonding to silicate ceramics: impact of different pretreatment methods on shear bond strength between ceramic restorations and ceramic brackets
    Jungbauer, Rebecca
    Kirschneck, Christian
    Hammer, Christian M.
    Proff, Peter
    Edelhoff, Daniel
    Stawarczyk, Bogna
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (03) : 2827 - 2837
  • [40] Effects of salicylic-lactic acid and bonding adhesives on the shear bond strength of brackets and decalcification of enamel
    Chang, WG
    Lim, BS
    Lee, YK
    Kim, CW
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : B319 - B319