Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process

被引:21
|
作者
Reicheneder, Claudia [1 ]
Hofrichter, Bernd [1 ]
Faltermeier, Andreas [1 ]
Proff, Peter [1 ]
Lippold, Carsten [2 ]
Kirschneck, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Regensburg, Dept Orthodont, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
[2] Univ Munster, Dept Orthodont, D-48149 Munster, Germany
来源
HEAD & FACE MEDICINE | 2014年 / 10卷
关键词
Retainer; Wire; Adhesive; Sandblasting; Shear bond strength; ORTHODONTIC RETAINERS; ENAMEL;
D O I
10.1186/1746-160X-10-51
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: We aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of three different retainer wires and three different bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process of enamel surface sandblasting. Methods: 400 extracted bovine incisors were divided into 10 groups of 20 paired specimens each. 10 specimens of each group were pretreated by enamel sandblasting. The retainer wires Bond-A-Braid (TM), GAC-Wildcat (R)-Twistflex and everStick (R) ORTHO were bonded to the teeth with the adhesives Transbond (TM)-LR, Tetric-EvoFlow (TM) and Stick (R) FLOW and then debonded measuring the SBS. Results: While sandblasting generally increased SBS for all tested combinations, the retainer wires bonded with Transbond (TM)-LR showed the highest SBS both with and without prior sandblasting. Significantly lower SBS were found for Tetric-EvoFlow (TM) that were comparable to those for everStick (R) ORTHO. Conclusions: Pretreatment of enamel surfaces by sandblasting increased the SBS of all retainer-wires. Transbond (TM)-LR showed the best results compared to Tetric-EvoFlow (TM) and everStick (R) ORTHO, while all combinations used provided sufficient bonding strengths for clinical use.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF THE SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF DIFFERENT CERAMIC BRACKET AND ADHESIVES
    LEE, JW
    KIM, SC
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 (03) : 993 - 993
  • [22] Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to amalgam with different intermediate resins and adhesives
    Germec, Derya
    Cakan, Umut
    Ozdemir, Fulya Isik
    Arun, Tulin
    Cakan, Murat
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2009, 31 (02) : 207 - 212
  • [23] Influence of caries infiltrant contamination on shear bond strength of different adhesives to dentin
    Jia, Liuhe
    Stawarczyk, Bogna
    Schmidlin, Patrick R.
    Attin, Thomas
    Wiegand, Annette
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 17 (02) : 643 - 648
  • [24] AMALGAM SHEAR BOND STRENGTH TO DENTIN USING DIFFERENT BONDING AGENTS
    VARGAS, MA
    DENEHY, GE
    RATANANAKIN, T
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 1994, 19 (06) : 224 - 227
  • [25] Shear bond strength of bonding to enamel with different laser irradiation distances
    Güvenç Başaran
    Nihal Hamamcı
    Atılım Akkurt
    Lasers in Medical Science, 2011, 26 : 149 - 156
  • [26] The effect of different bonding techniques on ceramic/resin shear bond strength
    Ruettermann, Stefan
    Fries, Lilli
    Raab, Wolfgang H. -M.
    Janda, Ralf
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2008, 10 (03): : 197 - 203
  • [27] Effects of a torsion load on the shear bond strength with different bonding techniques
    Yonekura, Yasuyuki
    Iijima, Masahiro
    Muguruma, Takeshi
    Mizoguchi, Itaru
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2012, 34 (01) : 67 - 71
  • [28] Shear bond strength of bonding to enamel with different laser irradiation distances
    Basaran, Guvenc
    Hamamci, Nihal
    Akkurt, Atilim
    LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 26 (02) : 149 - 156
  • [29] Shear Bond Strength and Bonding Properties of Orthodontic and nano Adhesives: A Comparative In-Vitro Study
    Bilal, Rabia
    Arjumand, Bilal
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2019, 10 (04) : 600 - 604
  • [30] Shear bond strength of brackets to demineralize enamel after different pretreatment methods
    Attin, Rengin
    Stawarczyk, Bogna
    Kecik, Defne
    Knoesel, Michael
    Wiechmann, Dirk
    Attin, Thomas
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2012, 82 (01) : 56 - 61