The Accuracy of Intraoperative O-arm Images for the Assessment of Pedicle Screw Postion

被引:67
|
作者
Santos, Edward R. G. [1 ]
Ledonio, Charles G. [1 ]
Castro, Carlos A. [1 ]
Truong, Walter H. [1 ]
Sembrano, Jonathan N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Orthopaed, Minneapolis, MN 55454 USA
关键词
intraoperative imaging; pedicle screws; screw revision; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; PLACEMENT; FIXATION; COMPLICATIONS; RELIABILITY; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182257cae
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Human cadaveric study. Objective. The objective of the study was to determine the accuracy of intraoperative O-arm images in determining pedicle screw position using open dissection as the gold standard. Summary of Background Data. Pedicle screws are widely used in the treatment of various spinal disorders. Postoperative computed tomographic scans are the imaging gold standard to detect pedicle screw malposition. However, a second procedure is necessary if such malpositioned screws have to be revised. The O-arm is an intraoperative scanner that allows revision of a screw without having to return the patient to the operating room for a separate procedure. No previous studies have looked at the accuracy of intraoperative O-arm images in determining pedicle screw position. Methods. This factorial validation study utilized 9 cadavers in a comparison of intraoperative O-arm images and the dissection gold standard. Four hundred sixteen screws were inserted using 3-dimensional image (O-arm) guidance from C2 to S1. The screw positions were randomized into 3 groups: "IN" (fully contained within the pedicle), "OUT-lateral," or "OUT-medial." After screw insertion, O-arm images were obtained and reviewed in a blinded fashion by 3 independent observers. Dissection identified the true position of the screws. Specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using dissection results as the gold standard. The interobserver reliability was also determined. Results. The overall accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, PPV, and NPV of O-arm images for the thoracic and lumbar spine were 73%, 76%, 71%, 74%, and 72%, respectively. Accuracy of surgeon perception in the cervical spine was significantly less than in the thoracic and lumbosacral spine. There was substantial interobserver agreement between the 3 readers. Conclusion. Intraoperative O-arm images accurately detect significant pedicle screw violations in the thoracic and lumbosacral spine but are less accurate for the cervical spine.
引用
收藏
页码:E119 / E125
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety and Accuracy of Freehand Pedicle Screw Placement and the Role of Intraoperative O-Arm A Single-Institution Experience
    Alomari, Safwan
    Lubelski, Daniel
    Lehner, Kurt
    Tang, Anthony
    Wolinsky, Jean-Paul
    Theodore, Nicholas
    Sciubba, Daniel M.
    Lo, Sheng-fu Larry
    Belzberg, Allan
    Weingart, Jon
    Witham, Timothy
    Gokaslan, Ziya L.
    Bydon, Ali
    SPINE, 2023, 48 (03) : 180 - 188
  • [2] Pedicle violation and Navigational errors in pedicle screw insertion using the intraoperative O-arm: A preliminary report
    Mathew, Jacob E.
    Mok, Kelvin
    Goulet, Benoit
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2013, 7 : e88 - e94
  • [3] The accuracy of intraoperative O-arm imaging in assessing thoracolumbar pedicle screws placement
    Aguilar-Chavez, Felipe
    Chavez, Carlos A. Arellanes
    Tapia, Maria E. Martinez
    Martinez-Loya, Carolina
    Medina, Cesar M. Gaytan
    JOURNAL OF MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 8 (03) : 227 - 231
  • [4] Intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging (O-arm) for assessment of pedicle screw position: Does it prevent unacceptable screw placement?
    Sembrano, Jonathan N.
    Polly, David W., Jr.
    Ledonio, Charles Gerald T.
    Santos, Edward Rainier G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2012, 6 : 49 - 54
  • [5] Pedicle Screw Placement With O-arm and Stealth Navigation
    Patil, Suresh
    Lindley, Emily M.
    Burger, Evalina L.
    Yoshihara, Hiroyuki
    Patel, Vikas V.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (01) : E61 - E65
  • [6] Benefits and Pitfalls of O-Arm Navigation in Cervical Pedicle Screw
    Shin, Hong Kyung
    Jeon, Sang Ryong
    Roh, Sung Woo
    Park, Jin Hoon
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 159 : E460 - E465
  • [7] O-Arm Assisted Cervicothoracic Spine Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy Is Higher Than C-Arm Fluoroscopy
    Inoue, Tomohisa
    Wada, Keiji
    Tominaga, Ayako
    Tamaki, Ryo
    Hirota, Tomoya
    Okazaki, Ken
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 158 : E996 - E1001
  • [8] Pedicle Screw Insertion Accuracy Using O-Arm, Robotic Guidance, or Freehand Technique A Comparative Study
    Laudato, Pietro Aniello
    Pierzchala, Katarzyna
    Schizas, Constantin
    SPINE, 2018, 43 (06) : E373 - E378
  • [9] A Quantitative Assessment of the Accuracy and Reliability of O-Arm Images for Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery
    Holloway, Kathryn
    Docef, Alen
    NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 72 : 47 - 57
  • [10] Clinical Assessment of Percutaneous Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Using the O-Arm Multidimensional Surgical Imaging System
    Houten, John K.
    Nasser, Rani
    Baxi, Nrupen
    NEUROSURGERY, 2012, 70 (04) : 990 - 995