Comparison of predictive accuracy for pathologically organ confined clinical stage T1c prostate cancer using human glandular kallikrein 2 and prostate specific antigen combined with clinical stage and Gleason grade

被引:16
|
作者
Haese, A
Vaisanen, V
Lilja, H
Kattan, MW
Rittenhouse, HG
Pettersson, K
Chan, DW
Huland, H
Sokoll, LJ
Partin, AW
机构
[1] Univ Clin Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Lund Univ, Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Div Clin Chem, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Clin Labs Urol & Med, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Turku Univ, Dept Biotechnol, Turku, Finland
[5] Hybritech Beckman Coulter Inc, San Diego, CA USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2005年 / 173卷 / 03期
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; prostate-specific antigen; tissue kallikreins; immunoassay;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000152618.38747.dd
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Previously human glandular kallikrein 2 (hK2) has been implicated to predict pathologically organ confined prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with stage T2 disease. Now we evaluated the usefulness of hK2, as measured by 2 entirely different immunoassay designs, to enhance the discrimination of pathologically organ from nonorgan confined clinical stage T1c PCa. Materials and Methods: A consecutive series of pretreatment serum from 148 men with clinical stage T1c PCa was used in 2 equally sensitive and specific methods to measure total hK2 with independent reagents and entirely different assay designs. Total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) were measured and percent fPSA was calculated. We determined the algorithm, hK2*tPSA/fPSA, from data generated by each hK2 assay, calculated means, medians and ranges for each analyte and algorithm, and calculated the significance of differences on univariate analysis. Using pretreatment PSA, clinical stage and biopsy Gleason grade we then developed a multivariate logistic regression base model to predict organ confined cancer and we compared predictions of the base model supplemented by the different hK2 measurements. Results: hK2 and hK2 based algorithms obtained by each hK2 assay were significantly different for pT2a/b vs pT3a or greater PCa (p = 0.034 to 0.0001) compared to tPSA (p = 0.06), fPSA (p = 0.90) or percent fPSA (p = 0.059). However, AUC (0.67 to 0.70) calculated by ROC analysis of the 4 models containing hK2 derived information was not significantly larger than that of the base model (AUC = 0.64, p = 0.52). Conclusions: The current data confirm that hK2 alone or hK2*tPSA/fPSA measured by 2 immunoassays is significantly lower in men with pT2a/b vs pT3a or greater PCa compared to tPSA, fPSA or percent fPSA on univariate analysis of a validation set of clinical stage T1c prostate cancer treated at an American center of excellence for prostate cancer surgery. However, the incorporation of preoperative hK2 into multiparameter predictive models for pT2 cancers did not increase predictive accuracy in this cohort of men.
引用
收藏
页码:752 / 756
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fewer systematic prostate core biopsies in clinical stage T1c prostate cancer leads to biochemical recurrence after brachytherapy as monotherapy
    Ozawa, Yu
    Nohara, Sunao
    Nakamura, Ken
    Hattori, Seiya
    Yagi, Yasuto
    Nishiyama, Toru
    Yorozu, Atsunori
    Monma, Tetsuo
    Saito, Shiro
    PROSTATE, 2024, 84 (05): : 502 - 510
  • [42] Change in prostate cancer grade over time in men followed expectantly for stage T1c disease
    Sheridan, T. B.
    Epstein, J. I.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2007, 20 : 175A - 176A
  • [43] Change in prostate cancer grade over time in men followed expectantly for stage T1c disease
    Sheridan, T. B.
    Epstein, J. I.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2007, 87 : 175A - 176A
  • [44] Change in prostate cancer grade over time in men followed expectantly for stage T1c disease
    Sheridan, Todd B.
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Wang, Wenle
    Landis, Patricia B.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (03): : 901 - 904
  • [45] Prediction of metastatic prostate cancer by prostate-specific antigen in combination with T stage and Gleason Grade: Nationwide, population-based register study
    Thomsen, Frederik B.
    Westerberg, Marcus
    Garmo, Hans
    Robinson, David
    Holmberg, Lars
    Ulmert, Hans David
    Stattin, Par
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01):
  • [46] Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate specific antigen and Gleason score to predict prostate cancer stage
    Poulakis, V
    Witzsch, U
    De Vries, R
    Emmerlich, V
    Meves, M
    Altmannsberger, HM
    Becht, E
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (04): : 1306 - 1310
  • [47] Clinical stage, prostate-specific antigen and gleason grade to predict extracapsular disease or nodal metastasis in men with newly diagnosed, previously untreated prostate cancer - A multicenter study
    Puppo, P
    Perachino, M
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1997, 32 (03) : 273 - 279
  • [48] Correlation of Serum β2-Microglobulin Levels with Prostate-specific Antigen, Gleason Score, Clinical Stage, Tumor Metastasis and Therapy Efficacy in Prostate Cancer
    Zhang, Yun-xin
    Wang, Li
    Ji, Peng-yu
    Zhao, Gang-gang
    Zhong, Gan-ping
    Wang, Zhi-ping
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2013, 44 (04) : 259 - 265
  • [49] Change in prostate cancer grade over time in men followed expectantly for stage T1c disease - Comment
    Jarrard, David F.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (03): : 904 - 905
  • [50] Does site-specific labelling and individual processing of sextant biopsies improve the accuracy of prostate biopsy in predicting pathological stage in patients with T1c prostate cancer?
    Tombal, B
    Tajeddine, N
    Cosyns, JP
    Feyaerts, A
    Opsomer, R
    Wese, FX
    Van Cangh, PJ
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 89 (06) : 543 - 548