Comparison of predictive accuracy for pathologically organ confined clinical stage T1c prostate cancer using human glandular kallikrein 2 and prostate specific antigen combined with clinical stage and Gleason grade

被引:16
|
作者
Haese, A
Vaisanen, V
Lilja, H
Kattan, MW
Rittenhouse, HG
Pettersson, K
Chan, DW
Huland, H
Sokoll, LJ
Partin, AW
机构
[1] Univ Clin Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Lund Univ, Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Div Clin Chem, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Clin Labs Urol & Med, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Turku Univ, Dept Biotechnol, Turku, Finland
[5] Hybritech Beckman Coulter Inc, San Diego, CA USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2005年 / 173卷 / 03期
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; prostate-specific antigen; tissue kallikreins; immunoassay;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000152618.38747.dd
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Previously human glandular kallikrein 2 (hK2) has been implicated to predict pathologically organ confined prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with stage T2 disease. Now we evaluated the usefulness of hK2, as measured by 2 entirely different immunoassay designs, to enhance the discrimination of pathologically organ from nonorgan confined clinical stage T1c PCa. Materials and Methods: A consecutive series of pretreatment serum from 148 men with clinical stage T1c PCa was used in 2 equally sensitive and specific methods to measure total hK2 with independent reagents and entirely different assay designs. Total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) were measured and percent fPSA was calculated. We determined the algorithm, hK2*tPSA/fPSA, from data generated by each hK2 assay, calculated means, medians and ranges for each analyte and algorithm, and calculated the significance of differences on univariate analysis. Using pretreatment PSA, clinical stage and biopsy Gleason grade we then developed a multivariate logistic regression base model to predict organ confined cancer and we compared predictions of the base model supplemented by the different hK2 measurements. Results: hK2 and hK2 based algorithms obtained by each hK2 assay were significantly different for pT2a/b vs pT3a or greater PCa (p = 0.034 to 0.0001) compared to tPSA (p = 0.06), fPSA (p = 0.90) or percent fPSA (p = 0.059). However, AUC (0.67 to 0.70) calculated by ROC analysis of the 4 models containing hK2 derived information was not significantly larger than that of the base model (AUC = 0.64, p = 0.52). Conclusions: The current data confirm that hK2 alone or hK2*tPSA/fPSA measured by 2 immunoassays is significantly lower in men with pT2a/b vs pT3a or greater PCa compared to tPSA, fPSA or percent fPSA on univariate analysis of a validation set of clinical stage T1c prostate cancer treated at an American center of excellence for prostate cancer surgery. However, the incorporation of preoperative hK2 into multiparameter predictive models for pT2 cancers did not increase predictive accuracy in this cohort of men.
引用
收藏
页码:752 / 756
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage and Gleason sum as basis for predicting final pathological stage Japanese patients with prostate cancer
    Egawa, S
    Koh, H
    Satoh, T
    Ohori, M
    Uchida, T
    Kuwao, S
    Koshiba, K
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 26 (06) : 438 - 444
  • [32] Dedifferentiation of prostate cancer grade with time in men followed expectantly for stage T1C disease
    Epstein, JI
    Walsh, PC
    Carter, HB
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (05): : 1688 - 1691
  • [33] Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer - A multi-institutional update
    Partin, AW
    Kattan, MW
    Subong, ENP
    Walsh, PC
    Wojno, KJ
    Oesterling, JE
    Scardino, PT
    Pearson, JD
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (18): : 1445 - 1451
  • [34] Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer - A multi-institutional update
    Partin, AW
    Kattan, MW
    Subong, EN
    Walsh, PC
    Wojno, KJ
    Oesterling, JE
    Scardino, PT
    Pearson, JD
    Graefen, M
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2004, 35 (05) : 377 - 378
  • [35] Prostate cancer: Are clinical stages t1c and t2 similar?
    Billis, A
    Magna, LA
    Watanabe, IC
    Costa, MV
    Telles, GHQ
    Ferreira, U
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2005, 85 : 130A - 130A
  • [36] Prostate cancer: Are clinical stages T1c and T2 similar?
    Billis, A
    Magna, LA
    Watanabe, IC
    Costa, MV
    Telles, GHQ
    Ferreira, U
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2005, 18 : 130A - 130A
  • [37] PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN PATIENTS WITH CLINICAL STAGE-C PROSTATE-CANCER - RELATION TO LYMPH-NODE STATUS AND GRADE
    GRESKOVICH, FJ
    JOHNSON, DE
    TENNEY, DM
    STEPHENSON, RA
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 145 (04): : 798 - 801
  • [38] PREOPERATIVE SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN (PSA) AND GLEASON GRADE AS PREDICTORS OF PATHOLOGICAL STAGE IN CLINICALLY ORGAN CONFINED PROSTATE-CANCER - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE CHOICE OF PRIMARY-TREATMENT
    ENNIS, RD
    FLYNN, SD
    FISCHER, DB
    PESCHEL, RE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 27 : 284 - 284
  • [39] Clinical and pathological characteristics, and recurrence rates of stage T1c versus T2a or T2b prostate cancer
    Ramos, CG
    Carvalhal, GF
    Smith, DS
    Mager, DE
    Catalona, WJ
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 161 (05): : 1525 - 1529
  • [40] SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, CLINICAL STAGE, PATHOLOGICAL GRADE, AND THE INCIDENCE OF NODAL METASTASES IN PROSTATE-CANCER
    SANDS, ME
    ZAGARS, GK
    POLLACK, A
    VONESCHENBACH, AC
    UROLOGY, 1994, 44 (02) : 215 - 220