Patient Experience with the Patient-Centered Medical Home in Michigan's Statewide Multi-Payer Demonstration: A Cross-Sectional Study

被引:10
|
作者
Sarinopoulos, Issidoros [1 ]
Bechel-Marriott, Diane L. [2 ]
Malouin, Jean M. [3 ]
Zhai, Shaohui [1 ]
Forney, Jason C. [1 ]
Tanner, Clare L. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Michigan Publ Hlth Inst, Okemos, MI USA
[2] Ctr Healthcare Res & Transformat, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Dept Family Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Michigan Publ Hlth Inst, Ctr Data Management & Translat Res, 2501 Jolly Rd,Suite 180, Okemos, MI 48864 USA
关键词
patient experience; PCMH; multi-payer; primary care; CAHPS; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; CONSUMER ASSESSMENT; CARE; TRANSFORMATION; PROVIDERS; COST;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-017-4139-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The literature on patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) and patient experience is somewhat mixed. Government and private payers are promoting multi-payer PCMH initiatives to align requirements and resources and to enhance practice transformation outcomes. To this end, the multipayer Michigan Primary Care Transformation (MiPCT) demonstration project was carried out. To examine whether the PCMH is associated with a better patient experience, and whether a mature, multi-payer PCMH demonstration is associated with even further improvement in the patient experience. This is a cross-sectional comparison of adults attributed to MiPCT PCMH, non-participating PCMH, and non-PCMH practices, statistically controlling for potential confounders, and conducted among both general and high-risk patient samples. Responses came from 3893 patients in the general population and 4605 in the high-risk population (response rates of 31.8% and 34.1%, respectively). The Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey, with PCMH supplemental questions, was administered in January and February 2015. MiPCT general and high-risk patients reported a significantly better experience than non-PCMH patients in most domains. Adjusted mean differences were as follows: access (0.35**, 0.36***), communication (0.19*, 0.18*), and coordination (0.33**, 0.35***), respectively (on a 10-point scale, with significance indicated by: *= p < 0.05, **= p < 0.01, and ***= p < 0.001). Adjusted mean differences in overall provider ratings were not significant. Global odds ratios were significant for the domains of self-management support (1.38**, 1.41***) and comprehensiveness (1.67***, 1.61***). Non-participating PCMH ratings fell between MiPCT and non-PCMH across all domains and populations, sometimes attaining statistical significance. PCMH practices have more positive patient experiences across domains characteristic of advanced primary care. A mature multi-payer model has the strongest, most consistent association with a better patient experience, pointing to the need to provide consistent expectations, resources, and time for practice transformation. Our results held for a general population and a high-risk population which has much more contact with the healthcare system.
引用
收藏
页码:1202 / 1209
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Cost of Sustaining a Patient-Centered Medical Home: Experience From 2 States
    Magill, Michael K.
    Ehrenberger, David
    Scammon, Debra L.
    Day, Julie
    Allen, Tatiana
    Reall, Andreu J.
    Sides, Rhonda W.
    Kim, Jaewhan
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2015, 13 (05) : 429 - 435
  • [42] The Patient-Centered Medical Home Neighbor: A Subspecialty Physician's View
    Yee, Hal F., Jr.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 154 (01) : 63 - 64
  • [43] Capsule commentary on Rosenthal et al., A Difference-in-Difference Analysis of Changes in Quality, Utilization and Cost Following the Colorado Multi-Payer Patient-Centered Medical Home Pilot
    Abrams, Thad E.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 31 (03) : 323 - 323
  • [44] Care Experiences of Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions in a Payer-Based Patient-Centered Medical Home
    Goldberg, Debora Goetz
    Gimm, Gilbert
    Burla, Sriteja R.
    Nichols, Len M.
    POPULATION HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2020, 23 (04) : 305 - 312
  • [45] THE IMPACT OF PATIENT-CENTERED MEDICAL HOME TRANSFORMATION WTTURN VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION ON :PATIENT EXPERIENCE OF CARE
    Reddy, Ashok
    Canamucio, Anne
    Werner, Rachel M.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 29 : S228 - S229
  • [46] A patient-centered approach can improve rational drug use. A cross-sectional study
    Kocoglu, Mirac
    Yakar, Burkay
    Onalan, Erhan
    FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE REVIEW, 2024, 26 (02): : 201 - 207
  • [47] Health Care Savings with the Patient-Centered Medical Home: Community Care of North Carolina's Experience
    Fillmore, Herbert
    DuBard, C. Annette
    Ritter, Grant A.
    Jackson, Carlos T.
    POPULATION HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2014, 17 (03) : 141 - 148
  • [48] IMPLEMENTATION AND OUTCOMES OF A NATIONWIDE PATIENT-CENTERED MEDICAL HOME DEMONSTRATION IN FEDERALLY QUALIFIED HEALTH CENTERS
    Timbie, Justin W.
    Setodji, Claude
    Kress, Amii
    Lavelle, Tara
    Friedberg, Mark W.
    Mendel, Peter
    Chen, Emily K.
    Weidmer, Beverly
    Buttorff, Christine
    Malsberger, Rosalie J.
    Kommareddi, Mallika
    Rastegar, Afshin
    Kofner, Aaron
    Hiatt, Liisa
    Mahmud, Ammarah
    Giuriceo, Katherine
    Kahn, Katherine L.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 32 : S220 - S221
  • [49] Patient-Centered Medical Home Demonstration: A Prospective, Quasi-Experimental, Before and After Evaluation
    Reid, Robert J.
    Fishman, Paul A.
    Yu, Onchee
    Ross, Tyler R.
    Tufano, James T.
    Soman, Michael P.
    Larson, Eric B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2009, 15 (09): : E71 - E87
  • [50] IMPACT OF THE FIRST DEMONSTRATION OF A PATIENT-CENTERED MEDICAL HOME (PCMH) IN SINGAPORE ON QUALITY OF LIFE AND PATIENT ACTIVATION IN OLDER ADULTS
    Sum, G.
    Ho, S. H.
    Lim, Z. Z. B.
    Chay, J.
    Ginting, M. L.
    Tsao, M. A.
    Wong, C. H.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 : S156 - S156