Patient Experience with the Patient-Centered Medical Home in Michigan's Statewide Multi-Payer Demonstration: A Cross-Sectional Study

被引:10
|
作者
Sarinopoulos, Issidoros [1 ]
Bechel-Marriott, Diane L. [2 ]
Malouin, Jean M. [3 ]
Zhai, Shaohui [1 ]
Forney, Jason C. [1 ]
Tanner, Clare L. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Michigan Publ Hlth Inst, Okemos, MI USA
[2] Ctr Healthcare Res & Transformat, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Dept Family Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Michigan Publ Hlth Inst, Ctr Data Management & Translat Res, 2501 Jolly Rd,Suite 180, Okemos, MI 48864 USA
关键词
patient experience; PCMH; multi-payer; primary care; CAHPS; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; CONSUMER ASSESSMENT; CARE; TRANSFORMATION; PROVIDERS; COST;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-017-4139-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The literature on patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) and patient experience is somewhat mixed. Government and private payers are promoting multi-payer PCMH initiatives to align requirements and resources and to enhance practice transformation outcomes. To this end, the multipayer Michigan Primary Care Transformation (MiPCT) demonstration project was carried out. To examine whether the PCMH is associated with a better patient experience, and whether a mature, multi-payer PCMH demonstration is associated with even further improvement in the patient experience. This is a cross-sectional comparison of adults attributed to MiPCT PCMH, non-participating PCMH, and non-PCMH practices, statistically controlling for potential confounders, and conducted among both general and high-risk patient samples. Responses came from 3893 patients in the general population and 4605 in the high-risk population (response rates of 31.8% and 34.1%, respectively). The Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey, with PCMH supplemental questions, was administered in January and February 2015. MiPCT general and high-risk patients reported a significantly better experience than non-PCMH patients in most domains. Adjusted mean differences were as follows: access (0.35**, 0.36***), communication (0.19*, 0.18*), and coordination (0.33**, 0.35***), respectively (on a 10-point scale, with significance indicated by: *= p < 0.05, **= p < 0.01, and ***= p < 0.001). Adjusted mean differences in overall provider ratings were not significant. Global odds ratios were significant for the domains of self-management support (1.38**, 1.41***) and comprehensiveness (1.67***, 1.61***). Non-participating PCMH ratings fell between MiPCT and non-PCMH across all domains and populations, sometimes attaining statistical significance. PCMH practices have more positive patient experiences across domains characteristic of advanced primary care. A mature multi-payer model has the strongest, most consistent association with a better patient experience, pointing to the need to provide consistent expectations, resources, and time for practice transformation. Our results held for a general population and a high-risk population which has much more contact with the healthcare system.
引用
收藏
页码:1202 / 1209
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A pharmacy's journey toward the patient-centered medical home
    Erickson, Steven
    Hambleton, Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, 2011, 51 (02) : 156 - +
  • [32] Shared decision making, patient-centered communication and patient satisfaction - A cross-sectional analysis
    Siebinga, Veerle Y.
    Driever, Ellen M.
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    Brand, Paul L. P.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2022, 105 (07) : 2145 - 2150
  • [33] Spreading a Patient-Centered Medical Home Redesign A Case Study
    Hsu, Clarissa
    Coleman, Katie
    Ross, Tyler R.
    Johnson, Eric
    Fishman, Paul A.
    Larson, Eric B.
    Liss, David
    Trescott, Claire
    Reid, Robert J.
    JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 35 (02): : 99 - 108
  • [34] THE EFFECT OF PATIENT-CENTERED MEDICAL HOME TRANSFORMATION COUPLED WITH PAYMENT REFORM: PATIENT EXPERIENCE OUTCOMES
    Heyworth, Leonie
    Bitton, Asaf
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Schilling, Thad
    Schiff, Gordon D.
    Bates, David W.
    Simon, Steven R.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 28 : S216 - S216
  • [35] Gaps in patient-centered follow-up cancer care: A cross-sectional study
    Hobden, Breanne
    Turon, Heidi
    Waller, Amy
    Carey, Mariko
    Proietto, Anthony
    Sanson-Fisher, Rob
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 16 : 32 - 33
  • [36] Inpatients' Perception of Patient-Centered Care in Guangdong Province, China: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Zhou, Ling-Ming
    Xu, Richard Huan
    Xu, Yan-Hua
    Chang, Jing-Hui
    Wang, Dong
    INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING, 2021, 58
  • [37] Determinants of patients' attitudes toward patient-centered care: A cross-sectional study in Greece
    Tsimtsiou, Zoi
    Kirana, Paraskevi-Sofia
    Hatzichristou, Dimitrios
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2014, 97 (03) : 391 - 395
  • [38] CHANGES IN PATIENT EXPERIENCE IN A PAYMENT-LINKED PATIENT CENTERED MEDICAL HOME DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
    Bitton, Asaf
    Schiff, Gordon
    Yu, Tony
    Henderson, Daniel
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Simon, Steven R.
    Flier, Lydia A.
    Keohane, Carol
    Bates, David W.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 : S138 - S138
  • [39] Capsule commentary on Rosenthal et al., A Difference-in-Difference Analysis of Changes in Quality, Utilization and Cost Following the Colorado Multi-Payer Patient-Centered Medical Home Pilot
    Thad E. Abrams
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2016, 31 : 323 - 323
  • [40] The effects of patient-centered communication, social capital, and internet use on patient empowerment: a cross-sectional study in China
    Jiang, Shaohai
    Street, Richard L.
    GLOBAL HEALTH PROMOTION, 2019, 26 (04) : 33 - 43