Biomechanical Analysis of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Aperture Femoral Fixation

被引:4
|
作者
Mutnal, Amar [1 ]
Leo, Brian M. [2 ]
Vargas, Luis [3 ]
Colbrunn, Robb W. [4 ]
Butler, Robert S. [5 ]
Uribe, John W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Florida, Dept Orthoped Surg Sports Hlth, Weston, FL 33331 USA
[3] UHZ Sports Med Inst, Coral Gables, FL USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Lerner Res Inst, Dept Biomed Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Cleveland Clin, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
SIMULATED MUSCLE LOADS; ARTHROSCOPIC SINGLE-BUNDLE; TIBIAL INLAY; KNEE-JOINT; DEFICIENCY; TRANSLATION; INJURIES; ROTATION; FLEXION; PCL;
D O I
10.3928/01477447-20150105-50
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The goal of this study was to determine whether single-tunnel-double-bundle-equivalent posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction using an aperture femoral fixation device better replicated normal knee kinematics than single-bundle reconstruction. Eight fresh-frozen human cadaver knees underwent arthroscopically assisted PCL reconstruction and were examined with a robotic testing system to assess knee joint kinematics under combinations of applied internal, neutral, and external rotational tibial torque and anteroposterior translational forces at 0 degrees, 30 degrees, 60 degrees, 90 degrees, and 120 degrees flexion. Three conditions were tested: (1) intact PCL; (2) single-tunnel PCL reconstruction with anterolateral and posteromedial bundle fixation at 90 degrees/90 degrees (single bundle); and (3) 90 degrees/0 degrees (double-bundle equivalent), respectively. Posterior tibial translation was the primary outcome measure. Compared with the intact knee, double-bundle-equivalent reconstruction under external tibial torque allowed greater posterior translation across the flexion arc as a whole (P=.025) and at 30 degrees flexion (P=.027) when results were stratified by flexion angle. No other kinematic differences were found with single-bundle or double-bundle-equivalent fixation, including mediolateral translation and both coupled and isolated tibial rotation (P>.05). Single-bundle PCL reconstruction closely approximated native knee rotational and translational kinematics, whereas double-bundle-equivalent reconstruction permitted increased posterior translation with applied external tibial torque, particularly at lower flexion angles. Single-bundle PCL reconstruction provides knee stability similar to the intact condition, making it a practical alternative to conventional double-bundle PCL reconstruction. The authors found that double-bundle-equivalent reconstruction provided no advantage to justify its clinical use.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 16
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RECONSTRUCTION OF THE POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT
    MARSHALL, DJ
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1987, 69 (01): : 162 - 162
  • [32] Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an arthroscopic femoral inlay technique
    Fabrizio Margheritini
    Francesco Frascari Diotallevi
    Pier Paolo Mariani
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2011, 19 : 2033 - 2035
  • [33] Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an arthroscopic femoral inlay technique
    Margheritini, Fabrizio
    Diotallevi, Francesco Frascari
    Mariani, Pier Paolo
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2011, 19 (12) : 2033 - 2035
  • [34] RECONSTRUCTION OF THE POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT
    ERIKSSON, E
    HAGGMARK, T
    JOHNSON, RJ
    ORTHOPEDICS, 1986, 9 (02) : 217 - 220
  • [35] Reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament
    Raisbeck, CC
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2005, 87B (06): : 885 - 885
  • [36] RECONSTRUCTION OF THE POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT
    HUGHSTON, JC
    DEGENHARDT, TC
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1982, (164) : 59 - 77
  • [37] Biomechanical and Computed Tomography Analysis of Adjustable Femoral Cortical Fixation Devices for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Cadaveric Human Knee Model
    Born, Trevor R.
    Biercevicz, Alison M.
    Koruprolu, Sarath C.
    Paller, David
    Spenciner, Dave
    Fadale, Paul D.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2016, 32 (02): : 253 - 261
  • [38] Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bioabsorbable cross-pin femoral fixation: a technical note
    Choi, Nam-Hong
    Son, Kyung-Mo
    Victoroff, Brian N.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2008, 16 (05) : 476 - 478
  • [39] Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bioabsorbable cross-pin femoral fixation: a technical note
    Nam-Hong Choi
    Kyung-Mo Son
    Brian N. Victoroff
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2008, 16 : 476 - 478
  • [40] Reverse Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Fixation: A Biomechanical Comparison Study of Tibial Cross-Pin and Femoral Interference Screw Fixation
    Lawley, Richard J.
    Klein, Samuel E.
    Chudik, Steven C.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2017, 33 (03): : 625 - 632