Biomechanical Analysis of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Aperture Femoral Fixation

被引:4
|
作者
Mutnal, Amar [1 ]
Leo, Brian M. [2 ]
Vargas, Luis [3 ]
Colbrunn, Robb W. [4 ]
Butler, Robert S. [5 ]
Uribe, John W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Florida, Dept Orthoped Surg Sports Hlth, Weston, FL 33331 USA
[3] UHZ Sports Med Inst, Coral Gables, FL USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Lerner Res Inst, Dept Biomed Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Cleveland Clin, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
SIMULATED MUSCLE LOADS; ARTHROSCOPIC SINGLE-BUNDLE; TIBIAL INLAY; KNEE-JOINT; DEFICIENCY; TRANSLATION; INJURIES; ROTATION; FLEXION; PCL;
D O I
10.3928/01477447-20150105-50
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The goal of this study was to determine whether single-tunnel-double-bundle-equivalent posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction using an aperture femoral fixation device better replicated normal knee kinematics than single-bundle reconstruction. Eight fresh-frozen human cadaver knees underwent arthroscopically assisted PCL reconstruction and were examined with a robotic testing system to assess knee joint kinematics under combinations of applied internal, neutral, and external rotational tibial torque and anteroposterior translational forces at 0 degrees, 30 degrees, 60 degrees, 90 degrees, and 120 degrees flexion. Three conditions were tested: (1) intact PCL; (2) single-tunnel PCL reconstruction with anterolateral and posteromedial bundle fixation at 90 degrees/90 degrees (single bundle); and (3) 90 degrees/0 degrees (double-bundle equivalent), respectively. Posterior tibial translation was the primary outcome measure. Compared with the intact knee, double-bundle-equivalent reconstruction under external tibial torque allowed greater posterior translation across the flexion arc as a whole (P=.025) and at 30 degrees flexion (P=.027) when results were stratified by flexion angle. No other kinematic differences were found with single-bundle or double-bundle-equivalent fixation, including mediolateral translation and both coupled and isolated tibial rotation (P>.05). Single-bundle PCL reconstruction closely approximated native knee rotational and translational kinematics, whereas double-bundle-equivalent reconstruction permitted increased posterior translation with applied external tibial torque, particularly at lower flexion angles. Single-bundle PCL reconstruction provides knee stability similar to the intact condition, making it a practical alternative to conventional double-bundle PCL reconstruction. The authors found that double-bundle-equivalent reconstruction provided no advantage to justify its clinical use.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 16
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biomechanics of initial tibial fixation in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Margheritini, F
    Rihn, JA
    Mauro, CS
    Stabile, KJ
    Woo, SLY
    Harner, CD
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2005, 21 (10): : 1164 - 1171
  • [22] Biomechanical analysis of a double bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using robotic technology
    Janaushek, Marsie A.
    Woo, Savio L.-Y.
    Kanamori, Akihiro
    Vogrin, Tracy M.
    Yagi, Masayoshi
    Harner, Christopher
    American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Bioengineering Division (Publication) BED, 1999, 43 : 25 - 26
  • [23] Patella-tibial transfixation for posterior cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction: A biomechanical analysis
    Kambic H.E.
    Dass A.G.
    Andrish J.T.
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 1997, 5 (4) : 245 - 250
  • [24] Arthroscopic fixation of avulsion of the posterior cruciate ligament from femoral insertion
    Park, IS
    Kim, SJ
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2005, 21 (11): : 1397 - 1397
  • [25] Anatomical posterior cruciate ligament transplantation - A biomechanical analysis
    Davis, Daniel K.
    Goltz, David H.
    Fithian, Donald C.
    D'Lima, Darryl
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (07): : 1126 - 1133
  • [26] A rare complication of tunnel aperture breach in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Wu, Bo
    Li, Jian-hua
    Liang, Xiao-song
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (04) : 1702 - 1703
  • [27] Different femoral tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a finite element analysis
    Wang, Bing
    Ye, Yongjie
    Yao, Long
    Wei, Ancheng
    Huang, Xin
    Wang, Zhiqiang
    Yu, Xiaojun
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [28] Different femoral tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a finite element analysis
    Bing Wang
    Yongjie Ye
    Long Yao
    Ancheng Wei
    Xin Huang
    Zhiqiang Wang
    Xiaojun Yu
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 24
  • [29] Biomechanical Properties of Different Fixation Techniques for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fractures
    Domnick, Christoph
    Koesters, Clemens
    Franke, Friederike
    Raschke, Michael J.
    Petersen, Wolf
    Fink, Christian
    Herbort, Mirco
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2016, 32 (06): : 1065 - 1071
  • [30] Biomechanical analysis of an Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Yagi, M
    Wong, EK
    Kanamori, A
    Debski, RE
    Fu, FH
    Woo, SLY
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2002, 30 (05): : 660 - 666