Utility of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube in head and neck cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiation: A prospective observational cohort

被引:7
|
作者
Dechaphunkul, Tanadech [1 ]
Soonthornrak, Pawitra [1 ]
Geater, Sarayut Lucien [2 ]
Dechaphunkul, Arunee [3 ]
机构
[1] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Hat Yai, Thailand
[2] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Resp & Resp Crit Care Med, Hat Yai, Thailand
[3] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med, Med Oncol Unit, Hat Yai, Thailand
关键词
Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic; gastrostomy; Head and neck cancer; Chemoradiation; Weight loss; Tube dependence; WEIGHT-LOSS; NUTRITIONAL CONCEPTS; PLACEMENT; RADIOTHERAPY; IMPACT; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103512
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: The necessity of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PPEG) before concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients remains uncertain. We evaluated the utilization rate of PPEG tube. Weight changes and tube dependence were also assessed. Materials and methods: This prospective cohort study evaluated the utilization rate of PPEG tube in patients with newly diagnosed HNC undergoing CCRT. Baseline characteristics, nutrition status, and weight loss data were collected and compared between use and non-use groups. Results: 110 patients (94.8%) used PPEG tube (70 fully-used and 40 partially-used groups). Non-users had a tendency to lose weight more than partially and fully-used groups; 9.13%, 3.42%, and 1.95%, respectively (p = 0.085). Fully-used group had significantly longer time of tube dependence than partially-used group, 7.0 months versus 4.9 months (p = 0.012). The type of PPEG tube use (full use or partial use) and presence of dysphagia were significantly related to tube dependence. The time ratio of tube dependence for partially-used patients versus fully-used patients was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.68-0.99) (p = 0.039). The time ratio for patients with symptoms of dysphagia was 1.29 (95% CI: 1.02-1.63) (p = 0.032). At the end of CCRT, 96.6% of patients agreed that PPEG tube was necessary. Conclusion: We recommend PPEG for patients undergoing CCRT. Partial use of PPEG with continuous oral intake as tolerated is strongly encouraged to maintain weight, and to reduce risk of tube dependence. Future study to evaluate effective swallowing exercise is warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY IN HEAD AND NECK-CANCER
    BOURRY, J
    SIMON, JM
    FALEWEE, MN
    SANTINI, J
    VALLICIONI, J
    DEMARD, F
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGIE, 1988, 37 (04): : 169 - 171
  • [42] The Experiences of Patients With Advanced Head and Neck Cancer With a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube: A Qualitative Descriptive Study
    Kwong, Janna P. Y.
    Stokes, Edith J.
    Posluns, Elaine C.
    Fitch, Margaret I.
    McAndrew, Alison
    Vandenbussche, Katherine A.
    NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 29 (04) : 526 - 533
  • [43] Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review
    Wang, Jinfeng
    Liu, Minjie
    Liu, Chao
    Ye, Yun
    Huang, Guanhong
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2014, 55 (03) : 559 - 567
  • [44] Use of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube feeding support in head and neck cancer patients.
    Kasozi, Ramla Namisango
    Choudhary, Anita
    Andrus, Kelly
    Wong, Richard C. K.
    Randall, Rory Eric
    Orovets, Catherine Marie
    Bali, Gurvinder
    Karapetyan, Lilit
    Gibson, Michael K.
    Fu, Ping
    Sloan, Jesse
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [45] 'Push' versus 'pull' percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with advanced head and neck cancer
    Tucker, AT
    Gourin, CG
    Ghegan, MD
    Porubsky, ES
    Martindale, RG
    Terris, DJ
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2003, 113 (11): : 1898 - 1902
  • [46] Transcervical approach to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion in a patient with head and neck cancer
    Shariff, Amir Hafeez
    Waqas, Muhammad
    Akhtar, Shabbir
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2014, 7 (03) : 256 - 259
  • [47] STOMAL SEEDING OF HEAD AND NECK-CANCER BY PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY TUBE PLACEMENT
    LEE, DS
    MOHITTABATABAI, MA
    RUSH, BF
    LEVINE, C
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 2 (02) : 170 - 173
  • [48] Prophylactic gastrostomy tubes in patients undergoing intensive irradiation for cancer of the head and neck
    Lee, JH
    Machtay, M
    Unger, LD
    Weinstein, GS
    Weber, RS
    Chalian, AA
    Rosenthal, DI
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1998, 124 (08) : 871 - 875
  • [49] STOMAL SEEDING OF HEAD AND NECK-CANCER BY PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) TUBE
    STRODEL, WE
    KENADY, DE
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 2 (05) : 462 - 463
  • [50] Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with head and neck cancer: Influence on nutritional status, utilisation rate and complications
    Hausmann, Johannes
    Kubesch, Alica
    von der Gruen, Jens Mueller
    Goettlich, Carmen M.
    Filmann, Natalie
    Tal, Andrea Oliver
    Vermehren, Johannes
    Friedrich-Rust, Mireen
    Waechtershaeuser, Astrid
    Bojunga, Joerg
    Blumenstein, Irina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 73 (11)