Utility of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube in head and neck cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiation: A prospective observational cohort

被引:7
|
作者
Dechaphunkul, Tanadech [1 ]
Soonthornrak, Pawitra [1 ]
Geater, Sarayut Lucien [2 ]
Dechaphunkul, Arunee [3 ]
机构
[1] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Hat Yai, Thailand
[2] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Resp & Resp Crit Care Med, Hat Yai, Thailand
[3] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med, Med Oncol Unit, Hat Yai, Thailand
关键词
Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic; gastrostomy; Head and neck cancer; Chemoradiation; Weight loss; Tube dependence; WEIGHT-LOSS; NUTRITIONAL CONCEPTS; PLACEMENT; RADIOTHERAPY; IMPACT; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103512
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: The necessity of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PPEG) before concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients remains uncertain. We evaluated the utilization rate of PPEG tube. Weight changes and tube dependence were also assessed. Materials and methods: This prospective cohort study evaluated the utilization rate of PPEG tube in patients with newly diagnosed HNC undergoing CCRT. Baseline characteristics, nutrition status, and weight loss data were collected and compared between use and non-use groups. Results: 110 patients (94.8%) used PPEG tube (70 fully-used and 40 partially-used groups). Non-users had a tendency to lose weight more than partially and fully-used groups; 9.13%, 3.42%, and 1.95%, respectively (p = 0.085). Fully-used group had significantly longer time of tube dependence than partially-used group, 7.0 months versus 4.9 months (p = 0.012). The type of PPEG tube use (full use or partial use) and presence of dysphagia were significantly related to tube dependence. The time ratio of tube dependence for partially-used patients versus fully-used patients was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.68-0.99) (p = 0.039). The time ratio for patients with symptoms of dysphagia was 1.29 (95% CI: 1.02-1.63) (p = 0.032). At the end of CCRT, 96.6% of patients agreed that PPEG tube was necessary. Conclusion: We recommend PPEG for patients undergoing CCRT. Partial use of PPEG with continuous oral intake as tolerated is strongly encouraged to maintain weight, and to reduce risk of tube dependence. Future study to evaluate effective swallowing exercise is warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Survey of the experience of head and neck cancer patients with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube.
    Sahu, Kamal Kant
    Gibbs, Lisa
    Siddiqui, Ahmad Daniyal
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)
  • [22] The Experience of Head and Neck Cancer Patients With a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube at a Canadian Cancer Center
    Osborne, Joanna B.
    Collin, Laura A.
    Posluns, Elaine C.
    Stokes, Edith J.
    Vandenbussche, Katherine A.
    NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 27 (05) : 661 - 668
  • [23] PROPHYLACTIC PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY FOR HEAD AND NECK CANCER PATIENTS: SHOULD IT BE PERFORMED IN SELECT CASES?
    Utako, Piyapon
    Sobhonslidsuk, Abhasnee
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 152 (05) : S416 - S416
  • [24] Effect of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube on swallowing in advanced head and neck cancer: A randomized controlled study
    Axelsson, Lars
    Silander, Ewa
    Nyman, Jan
    Bove, Mogens
    Johansson, Leif
    Hammerlid, Eva
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2017, 39 (05): : 908 - 915
  • [25] PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY IN HEAD AND NECK-CANCER PATIENTS
    HUNTER, JG
    LAURETANO, L
    SHELLITO, PC
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1989, 210 (01) : 42 - 46
  • [26] Percutaneous feeding tubes in patients with head and neck cancer: rethinking prophylactic placement for patients undergoing chemoradiation
    Lawson, Joshua D.
    Gaultney, Jennifer
    Saba, Nabil
    Grist, William
    Davis, Lawrence
    Johnstone, Peter A. S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2009, 30 (04) : 244 - 249
  • [27] Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in veterans treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation for head and neck cancer.
    Mariash, Evan Michael
    Klein, Mark A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [28] Requirement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in head-and-neck cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy: An analysis of clinical and anatomic factors
    Zauls, A. Jason
    Watkins, John M.
    Lucas, John
    Shirai, Keisuke
    Sharma, Anand K.
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 3 (02) : E61 - E69
  • [29] Impact of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement on treatment tolerance in head and neck cancer patients treated with cetuximab plus radiation
    Yamazaki, Tomoko
    Enokida, Tomohiro
    Wakasugi, Tetsuro
    Zenda, Sadamoto
    Motegi, Atsushi
    Arahira, Satoko
    Akimoto, Tetsuo
    Tahara, Makoto
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 46 (09) : 825 - 831
  • [30] Comparison of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with reactive enteral nutrition in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy: A systematic review
    Mellors, Kate
    Ye, Xiaodan
    Van den Brande, Jonathan
    Mak, Tsz Wai Ray
    Brown, Teresa
    Findlay, Merran
    Bauer, Judy
    CLINICAL NUTRITION ESPEN, 2021, 46 : 87 - 98