Utility of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube in head and neck cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiation: A prospective observational cohort

被引:7
|
作者
Dechaphunkul, Tanadech [1 ]
Soonthornrak, Pawitra [1 ]
Geater, Sarayut Lucien [2 ]
Dechaphunkul, Arunee [3 ]
机构
[1] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Hat Yai, Thailand
[2] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Resp & Resp Crit Care Med, Hat Yai, Thailand
[3] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med, Med Oncol Unit, Hat Yai, Thailand
关键词
Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic; gastrostomy; Head and neck cancer; Chemoradiation; Weight loss; Tube dependence; WEIGHT-LOSS; NUTRITIONAL CONCEPTS; PLACEMENT; RADIOTHERAPY; IMPACT; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103512
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: The necessity of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PPEG) before concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients remains uncertain. We evaluated the utilization rate of PPEG tube. Weight changes and tube dependence were also assessed. Materials and methods: This prospective cohort study evaluated the utilization rate of PPEG tube in patients with newly diagnosed HNC undergoing CCRT. Baseline characteristics, nutrition status, and weight loss data were collected and compared between use and non-use groups. Results: 110 patients (94.8%) used PPEG tube (70 fully-used and 40 partially-used groups). Non-users had a tendency to lose weight more than partially and fully-used groups; 9.13%, 3.42%, and 1.95%, respectively (p = 0.085). Fully-used group had significantly longer time of tube dependence than partially-used group, 7.0 months versus 4.9 months (p = 0.012). The type of PPEG tube use (full use or partial use) and presence of dysphagia were significantly related to tube dependence. The time ratio of tube dependence for partially-used patients versus fully-used patients was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.68-0.99) (p = 0.039). The time ratio for patients with symptoms of dysphagia was 1.29 (95% CI: 1.02-1.63) (p = 0.032). At the end of CCRT, 96.6% of patients agreed that PPEG tube was necessary. Conclusion: We recommend PPEG for patients undergoing CCRT. Partial use of PPEG with continuous oral intake as tolerated is strongly encouraged to maintain weight, and to reduce risk of tube dependence. Future study to evaluate effective swallowing exercise is warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PROPHYLACTIC PERCUTANEOUS GASTROSTOMY TUBE FOR HEAD AND NECK CANCER PATIENTS UNDERGOING CHEMORADIATION TREATMENT
    Contreras Martinez, J.
    Perez, G.
    Lazo, A.
    Herruzo, I.
    Gonzalo, M.
    Lainez, L.
    Olveira, F.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 : S328 - S328
  • [2] Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube dependence following chemoradiation in head and neck cancer patients
    Pohar, Surjeet
    Demarcantonio, Michael
    Whiting, Phillip
    Crandley, Edwin
    Wadsworth, John
    Karakla, Daniel
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2015, 125 (06): : 1366 - 1371
  • [3] Utility of Prophylactic Percutaneous Gastrostomy in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Receiving Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Multicenter Analysis
    Neves, Maria Teresa
    Ferreira, Andre
    Branco, Vanessa
    Abreu, Maria
    Alves, Fatima R.
    Baptista, Carlota
    Graca, Joana
    Ferreira, Filipa
    Malheiro, Mariana
    Martins, Ana
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [4] Predictors of the need for prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy
    Satoshi Kano
    Nayuta Tsushima
    Takayoshi Suzuki
    Seijiro Hamada
    Taizo Yokokawa
    Hiroshi Idogawa
    Koichi Yasuda
    Hideki Minatogawa
    Yasuhiro Dekura
    Hidefumi Aoyama
    Akihiro Homma
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2021, 26 : 1179 - 1187
  • [5] Predictors of the need for prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy
    Kano, Satoshi
    Tsushima, Nayuta
    Suzuki, Takayoshi
    Hamada, Seijiro
    Yokokawa, Taizo
    Idogawa, Hiroshi
    Yasuda, Koichi
    Minatogawa, Hideki
    Dekura, Yasuhiro
    Aoyama, Hidefumi
    Homma, Akihiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 26 (07) : 1179 - 1187
  • [6] Safety and effectiveness of prophylactic gastrostomy tubes for head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemoradiation
    Nguyen, Nam P.
    North, Debra
    Smith, Herbert J.
    Dutta, Suresh
    Alfieri, Alan
    Karlsson, Ulf
    Lee, Howard
    Martinez, Tomas
    Lemanski, Claire
    Nguyen, Ly M.
    Ludin, Adir
    Sallah, Sabah
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2006, 15 (04): : 199 - 203
  • [7] Timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients
    Raynor, EM
    Williams, MF
    Martindale, RG
    Porubsky, ES
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1999, 120 (04) : 479 - 482
  • [8] USE OF PROPHYLACTIC GASTROSTOMY TUBE BEFORE CHEMORADIATION IN LOCALLY ADVANCED HEAD AND NECK CANCER PATIENTS
    Masood, A.
    Mehmood, T.
    Iqbal, H.
    Ali, M.
    Hussain, R.
    Jamshed, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 : S14 - S14
  • [9] Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients: results of tertiary institute
    Jaakko Pulkkinen
    Jami Rekola
    Mari Asanti
    Reidar Grénman
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2014, 271 : 1755 - 1758
  • [10] Defining the indications for prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes in head and neck cancer patients
    Foster, JM
    Filacoma, P
    Brady, B
    Nava, H
    Hill, H
    Hicks, W
    Rigual, N
    Loree, T
    Gibbs, JF
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 13 (02) : 99 - 100