Geographic variation in resistance to nectar robbing and consequences for pollination

被引:4
|
作者
Adler, Lynn S. [1 ]
Leege, Lissa M. [2 ]
Irwin, Rebecca E. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Biol, Morrill Sci Ctr South 221, 611 N Pleasant St, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[2] Georgia Southern Univ, Dept Biol, POB 8042-1, Statesboro, GA 30460 USA
[3] Dartmouth Coll, Life Sci Ctr, Dept Biol Sci, 78 Coll St, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[4] North Carolina State Univ, David Clark Labs 253, Dept Appl Ecol, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
Carolina jessamine; common garden experiment; nectar robbing; Gelsemium sempervirens; geographic mosaic; Loganiaceae; pollination; resistance; GELSEMIUM-SEMPERVIRENS LOGANIACEAE; QUANTITATIVE GENETICS; IPOMOPSIS-AGGREGATA; POLEMONIUM-VISCOSUM; NATURAL-SELECTION; FLORAL HERBIVORES; ALPINE SKYPILOT; PLANT; TRAITS; TIME;
D O I
10.3732/ajb.1600114
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Floral evolution is frequently ascribed to selection by pollinators, but may also be shaped by antagonists. However, remarkably few studies have examined geographic mosaics in resistance to floral antagonists or the consequences for other floral interactions. METHODS: Gelsemium sempervirens experiences frequent nectar robbing in northern Georgia, but rarely in southern Georgia. We conducted common-garden experiments in both locations using genotypes from each region and measured robbing, pollinator attraction, floral attractive and defensive traits, and plant reproduction. KEY RESULTS: Nectar robbing was more than four times higher in the north vs. south, and pollinator visits did not differ between gardens. Across both gardens, northern genotypes were half as likely to be nectar-robbed but received half as many pollinator visits as southern genotypes, suggesting evolution of resistance to robbing at a cost of reduced pollinator attraction. Plant-level traits, such as height and number of flowers, were more closely associated with resistance to robbing than floral size, shape, or chemistry. Northern genotypes had lower female and estimated male reproduction compared to southern genotypes at both locations, which could be due to costs of resistance to nectar robbing, or costs of adaptations to other biotic or abiotic differences between regions. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that geographic variation can play a strong role structuring interactions with floral antagonists and mutualists and provides evidence consistent with the hypothesis that local resistance to nectar robbing imposes costs in terms of decreased pollinator attraction and reproduction.
引用
收藏
页码:1819 / 1828
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Nectar resorption and pollination economy
    Nepi, M
    Pacini, E
    Vesprini, JL
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHT INTERNATIONAL POLLINATION SYMPOSIUM POLLINATION: INTEGRATOR OF CROPS AND NATIVE PLANT SYSTEMS, 2001, (561): : 123 - 126
  • [32] The behavioral ecology of nectar robbing: why be tactic constant?
    Bronstein, Judith L.
    Barker, Jessica L.
    Lichtenberg, Elinor M.
    Richardson, Leif L.
    Irwin, Rebecca E.
    CURRENT OPINION IN INSECT SCIENCE, 2017, 21 : 14 - 18
  • [33] Geographic variation of floral scent in a highly specialized pollination mutualism
    Soler, Catherine
    Hossaert-McKey, Martine
    Buatois, Bruno
    Bessiere, Jean-Marie
    Schatz, Bertrand
    Proffit, Magali
    PHYTOCHEMISTRY, 2011, 72 (01) : 74 - 81
  • [34] NECTAR ROBBING BY SOLITARY WASPS (HYMENOPTERA, VESPOIDEA, EUMENIDAE)
    HAESELER, V
    ENTOMOLOGIA GENERALIS, 1980, 6 (01) : 49 - 55
  • [35] Nectar robbing impacts pollinator behavior but not plant reproduction
    Hazlehurst, Jenny A.
    Karubian, Jordan O.
    OIKOS, 2016, 125 (11) : 1668 - 1676
  • [36] Geographic distribution and trait-mediated causes of nectar robbing by the European bumblebee Bombus terrestris on the Patagonian shrub Fuchsia magellanica
    Valdivia, Carlos E.
    Carroza, Jose P.
    Orellana, Jose I.
    FLORA, 2016, 225 : 30 - 36
  • [37] Novel nectar robbing negatively affects reproduction in Digitalis purpurea
    Mackin, Christopher R.
    Goulson, Dave
    Castellanos, Maria Clara
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 11 (19): : 13455 - 13463
  • [38] Social learning drives handedness in nectar-robbing bumblebees
    Goulson, D.
    Park, K. J.
    Tinsley, M. C.
    BussiSre, L. F.
    Vallejo-Marin, M.
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2013, 67 (07) : 1141 - 1150
  • [39] Social learning: Nectar robbing spreads socially in bumble bees
    Sherry, David F.
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (14) : R608 - R610
  • [40] Nectar robbing and plant reproduction: an interplay of positive and negative effects
    Rojas-Nossa, Sandra V.
    Sanchez, Jose Maria
    Navarro, Luis
    OIKOS, 2021, 130 (04) : 601 - 608