Geographic variation in resistance to nectar robbing and consequences for pollination

被引:4
|
作者
Adler, Lynn S. [1 ]
Leege, Lissa M. [2 ]
Irwin, Rebecca E. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Biol, Morrill Sci Ctr South 221, 611 N Pleasant St, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[2] Georgia Southern Univ, Dept Biol, POB 8042-1, Statesboro, GA 30460 USA
[3] Dartmouth Coll, Life Sci Ctr, Dept Biol Sci, 78 Coll St, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[4] North Carolina State Univ, David Clark Labs 253, Dept Appl Ecol, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
Carolina jessamine; common garden experiment; nectar robbing; Gelsemium sempervirens; geographic mosaic; Loganiaceae; pollination; resistance; GELSEMIUM-SEMPERVIRENS LOGANIACEAE; QUANTITATIVE GENETICS; IPOMOPSIS-AGGREGATA; POLEMONIUM-VISCOSUM; NATURAL-SELECTION; FLORAL HERBIVORES; ALPINE SKYPILOT; PLANT; TRAITS; TIME;
D O I
10.3732/ajb.1600114
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Floral evolution is frequently ascribed to selection by pollinators, but may also be shaped by antagonists. However, remarkably few studies have examined geographic mosaics in resistance to floral antagonists or the consequences for other floral interactions. METHODS: Gelsemium sempervirens experiences frequent nectar robbing in northern Georgia, but rarely in southern Georgia. We conducted common-garden experiments in both locations using genotypes from each region and measured robbing, pollinator attraction, floral attractive and defensive traits, and plant reproduction. KEY RESULTS: Nectar robbing was more than four times higher in the north vs. south, and pollinator visits did not differ between gardens. Across both gardens, northern genotypes were half as likely to be nectar-robbed but received half as many pollinator visits as southern genotypes, suggesting evolution of resistance to robbing at a cost of reduced pollinator attraction. Plant-level traits, such as height and number of flowers, were more closely associated with resistance to robbing than floral size, shape, or chemistry. Northern genotypes had lower female and estimated male reproduction compared to southern genotypes at both locations, which could be due to costs of resistance to nectar robbing, or costs of adaptations to other biotic or abiotic differences between regions. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that geographic variation can play a strong role structuring interactions with floral antagonists and mutualists and provides evidence consistent with the hypothesis that local resistance to nectar robbing imposes costs in terms of decreased pollinator attraction and reproduction.
引用
收藏
页码:1819 / 1828
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Testing non-additive effects of nectar-robbing ants and hummingbird pollination on the reproductive success of a parasitic plant
    Paula Caballero
    Carmen G. Ossa
    Wilfredo L. Gonzáles
    Catalina González-Browne
    Guadalupe Astorga
    Maureen M. Murúa
    Rodrigo Medel
    Plant Ecology, 2013, 214 : 633 - 640
  • [22] Variation in Pollination: Causes and Consequences for Plant Reproduction
    Richards, Shane A.
    Williams, Neal M.
    Harder, Lawrence D.
    AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2009, 174 (03): : 382 - 398
  • [23] Geographic variation in the robustness of pollination networks is mediated by modularity
    Liu, Hanlun
    Liu, Zheyi
    Zhang, Minhua
    Bascompte, Jordi
    He, Fangliang
    Chu, Chengjin
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2021, 30 (07): : 1447 - 1460
  • [24] Floral trait variation across individual plants within a population enhances defense capability to nectar robbing
    Tie, Shuang
    He, Yong-Deng
    Lazaro, Amparo
    Inouye, David W.
    Guo, You-Hao
    Yang, Chun-Feng
    PLANT DIVERSITY, 2023, 45 (03) : 315 - 325
  • [25] Primary nectar robbing by Apis mellifera (Apidae) on Pyrostegia venusta (Bignoniaceae): behavior, pillaging rate, and its consequences
    Polatto, Leandro P.
    Alves-Junior, Valter V.
    ACTA ETHOLOGICA, 2022, 25 (01) : 25 - 32
  • [26] Primary nectar robbing by Apis mellifera (Apidae) on Pyrostegia venusta (Bignoniaceae): behavior, pillaging rate, and its consequences
    Leandro P. Polatto
    Valter V. Alves-Junior
    acta ethologica, 2022, 25 : 25 - 32
  • [27] Floral trait variation across individual plants within a population enhances defense capability to nectar robbing
    Shuang Tie
    Yong-Deng He
    Amparo Lázaro
    David W.Inouye
    You-Hao Guo
    Chun-Feng Yang
    Plant Diversity, 2023, 45 (03) : 315 - 325
  • [28] Secondary nectar robbing by Lycaenidae and Riodinidae: Opportunistic but not infrequent
    Rankin, Erin E. Wilson E.
    Rankin, David T.
    ECOLOGY, 2023, 104 (02)
  • [29] Impacts of nectar robbing on the foraging ecology of a territorial hummingbird
    Hazlehurst, Jenny A.
    Karubian, Jordan O.
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2018, 149 : 27 - 34
  • [30] Effects of nectar robbing on nectar dynamics and bumblebee foraging strategies in Linaria vulgaris (Scrophulariaceae)
    Newman, DA
    Thomson, JD
    OIKOS, 2005, 110 (02) : 309 - 320