Will green finance promote green development: based on the threshold effect of R&D investment

被引:31
|
作者
Zhang, Jijian [1 ]
Li, Fengqin [1 ]
Ding, Xuhui [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Finance & Econ, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Green finance; Green development efficiency; R&D investment; Panel threshold model; ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION; DEVELOPMENT EFFICIENCY; ENERGY; CHINA; CREDIT; INDUSTRIES; IMPACT; POLICY; BELT;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-20161-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Deeply understanding the driving effect of green finance on green development is of great significance to promote economic transformation and realize the long-term green development. This paper uses the entropy method and undesirable-SE-SBM model to measure provincial green finance and green development efficiency respectively from 2008 to 2018. And based on the above, the panel threshold model is constructed to discuss the nonlinear relationship between green finance and green development efficiency from the first empirical verification. The results show that (1) the impact of green finance on green development has a significant single threshold effect, only when R&D investment crosses 2.810 can green finance significantly promote green development efficiency, and before that, it will suppress green development efficiency. (2) At present, a few provinces in China have crossed the threshold value of R&D investment, only including Beijing, Tianjin, and Shanghai, while the R&D investment of Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shandong, and Guangdong gradually approaches the threshold value. Therefore, improving the construction of the green financial system, correctly guiding the direction of green capital investment, and strengthening the supervision of environmental information disclosure are important.
引用
收藏
页码:60232 / 60243
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] R&D gets green funding boost
    不详
    TCE, 2008, (804): : 8 - 8
  • [42] Competitive Pressure and Diversification into Green R&D
    Stucki, Tobias
    Woerter, Martin
    REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2019, 55 (02) : 301 - 325
  • [43] Ecologies of green finance: Green sukuk and development of green Islamic finance in Malaysia
    Liu, Felicia H. M.
    Lai, Karen P. Y.
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2021, 53 (08): : 1896 - 1914
  • [44] Does green finance promote green transformation of the real economy?
    Hua, Mingzhong
    Li, Zhe
    Zhang, Yudong
    Wei, Xiaobei
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2024, 67
  • [45] Impact of green finance on R&D of "two high and one surplus" enterprises against the greenwashing background: exploring the role of green credit
    Ma, Wanwan
    Zheng, Chenbin
    Zhao, Xin
    Ma, Xiaowei
    Khan, Salahuddin
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (11) : 29493 - 29522
  • [46] Green R & D investment, ESG reporting, and corporate green innovation performance
    Rauf, Fawad
    Wanqiu, Wang
    Naveed, Khwaja
    Zhang, Yanqiu
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (03):
  • [47] Capacity investment and green R&D in a dynamic oligopoly under the potential shift in environmental damage
    Ni, Jian
    Huang, Hongzhi
    Wang, Peipei
    Zhou, Wei
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2020, 88 : 312 - 319
  • [48] How does multidimensional R&D investment affect green innovation? Evidence from China
    Shi, Yang
    Yang, Can
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [49] Corporate financial fragility, R&D investment, and corporate green innovation: Evidence from China
    Zhang, Zuomin
    Wu, Yingjue
    Wang, Honglei
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 62
  • [50] The impact of domestic and foreign public green R&D on domestic green innovation
    Herzer, Dierk
    ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 34 (01) : 1 - 21